Difference between revisions of "Talk:Chris and tolerance"
Kettle5000 (talk | contribs) |
Kettle5000 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
You've got a good idea for the page. I think that his overall prejudice beyond just homos and niggos needs to be addressed. He is far more intolerant of just that. His attitudes towards women do of course need their own article, and frankly womens rights doesn't cut it. Thats more explaining the actual term more than Chris's views of women. I say that the page should stay up, but it definitely needs some improvement first. --[[User:Edward|Edward]] 22:15, 3 May 2010 (UTC) | You've got a good idea for the page. I think that his overall prejudice beyond just homos and niggos needs to be addressed. He is far more intolerant of just that. His attitudes towards women do of course need their own article, and frankly womens rights doesn't cut it. Thats more explaining the actual term more than Chris's views of women. I say that the page should stay up, but it definitely needs some improvement first. --[[User:Edward|Edward]] 22:15, 3 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
Page needs more links. Like if you write that Chris said such and such about someone, link to the article or link to an external source. | Page needs more links. Like if you write that Chris said such and such about someone, link to the article or link to an external source.--[[User:Kettle5000|Kettle5000]] 21:48, 5 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 16:48, 5 May 2010
This article on Chris's overall bigotry has now been created. I know that there are separate articles here already discussing his racism and religious intolerance, but I feel that there should be greater coverage of Chris's prejudice and ignorance towards other groups of people as well. I hope we can work together over time and expand upon this page. Thank you.
Famicon64 19:02, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
- Why does everybody suddenly want to write a Chris And... article?--Beat 19:23, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
- I'm unsure. But I'm still of the opinion that drafting such articles in user sandboxes first really helps ensure the article's quality will be up to scratch before it is created for real. --Anonymax 19:35, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
- Agreed. Besides, I truly think there's no need for this. Half of this we can find out through the normal pages, not this. The Chris and Censorship page is one thing: it certainly merited a page devoted to what Chris has done to censor himself and others to make himself look good. This? This is more Chris and race, really.--Blazer 19:44, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
True but I'm hoping to cover the breadth of Chris's prejudice beyond race and homosexuals alone. We've logged prejudice against groups like women and authority figures in some CWCki pages, but they have'nt been covered in it's own pages because Chris has'nt held them up to the extent he has towards blacks and homosexuals, so I think this page should bring everything together and explain his general intolerance for all the groups he dislikes. For what we know a lot about, it'll just be kept short and have it linked to their own articles (i.e. Chris & race). Sounds good?
Famicon64 20:04, 3 May 2010 (UTC)Famicom64
Add also how chris wants everyone to tolerate his bs all the time, and how he can't tolerate anyone doing anything he doesn't likes.Basgon 20:12, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
You've got a good idea for the page. I think that his overall prejudice beyond just homos and niggos needs to be addressed. He is far more intolerant of just that. His attitudes towards women do of course need their own article, and frankly womens rights doesn't cut it. Thats more explaining the actual term more than Chris's views of women. I say that the page should stay up, but it definitely needs some improvement first. --Edward 22:15, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
Page needs more links. Like if you write that Chris said such and such about someone, link to the article or link to an external source.--Kettle5000 21:48, 5 May 2010 (UTC)