Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ryan Cash"
(→Is this for real?: new section) |
(The groaning of the diplomacy dyke.) |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
Of course, if the whole Ryan thing is just an elaborate [[troll]] prank...well, brother, that's a whole new level of depravity right there, whomping up a story about a dead boy and then using it to guilt-trip some poor muddlehead with an already tenebrous grip on reality. --[[User:The Iconoclast|The Iconoclast]] 00:45, 2 June 2011 (PDT) | Of course, if the whole Ryan thing is just an elaborate [[troll]] prank...well, brother, that's a whole new level of depravity right there, whomping up a story about a dead boy and then using it to guilt-trip some poor muddlehead with an already tenebrous grip on reality. --[[User:The Iconoclast|The Iconoclast]] 00:45, 2 June 2011 (PDT) | ||
:... I erased my original response to this before posting it. Instead, I'll just be as polite as I possibly can. "It is not for real. There is no real Ryan Cash, and to the best of all our knowledges, nobody has ever killed themselves over Sonichu. Nor has there ever been anything but one legitimate fan, and she did not kill herself. You may rest easy." That said... forgive me, but the diplomacy dyke holding back the arsehole within me groans under the weight of what I'm reading here. I would have thought that someone who "know(s) these things" and claimed authority over the world of the psychiatric would have been able to determine that the article is clearly the work of a troll. I'm 33% split between deleting this section for vandalism (obvious trolling), 33% convinced that the Internet has made you Autistic (and therefore worthy of pity), and 33% highly amused at the dichotomy of one claiming deep knowledge into the workings of the mind and simultaneously believing this hunk of cods-wallop may be true. --[[User:Ronichu|Ronichu]] 09:59, 2 June 2011 (PDT) | |||
Revision as of 11:59, 2 June 2011
To do
- Chris's comments to Ryan's family
- Ryan in the comic (make note he paid more attention to his sweethearts [Chris that is]).
- Artist depiction of Ryan --Champthom 02:44, 10 February 2009 (CET)
Just suggesting:
- 'committed suicide upon himself' quote
- how CWC is indeed responsible, kind of
--Jump 16:06, 2 May 2009 (CEST)
Joke
I can't believe I have to do this, but the "your" on the page is a joke. So don't change it, mmmkay? --Delabonte 04:42, 3 May 2009 (CEST)
- Derp, thought it might've been after the 100th time it was reverted. Afraid my grammar nazism comes before my knowledge of memes. >: I'll add a comment about that to the page. --Lime
03:37, 11 November 2009 (CET)
Rollback
Rolled back edits regarding the implication that Clyde is still alive and hunting Chris. I don't think that is really public or planned yet. --Fuckingstupid 00:26, 17 November 2009 (CET)
Is this for real?
I mean, if Ryan Cash killed himself over a barely passable web-distributed comic, it would suggest he had some real demons. Sure, Chris isn't exactly Mr. Empathy, but to pin the boy's suicide on him and Sonichu seems a bit much. If it hadn't been this, it'd have been something else that set him off. I'm a former psychology major; I know these things. There are red flags to look out for. Had Ryan exhibited any unusual behavior prior to this? Had he sought counseling? Just curious.
Of course, if the whole Ryan thing is just an elaborate troll prank...well, brother, that's a whole new level of depravity right there, whomping up a story about a dead boy and then using it to guilt-trip some poor muddlehead with an already tenebrous grip on reality. --The Iconoclast 00:45, 2 June 2011 (PDT)
- ... I erased my original response to this before posting it. Instead, I'll just be as polite as I possibly can. "It is not for real. There is no real Ryan Cash, and to the best of all our knowledges, nobody has ever killed themselves over Sonichu. Nor has there ever been anything but one legitimate fan, and she did not kill herself. You may rest easy." That said... forgive me, but the diplomacy dyke holding back the arsehole within me groans under the weight of what I'm reading here. I would have thought that someone who "know(s) these things" and claimed authority over the world of the psychiatric would have been able to determine that the article is clearly the work of a troll. I'm 33% split between deleting this section for vandalism (obvious trolling), 33% convinced that the Internet has made you Autistic (and therefore worthy of pity), and 33% highly amused at the dichotomy of one claiming deep knowledge into the workings of the mind and simultaneously believing this hunk of cods-wallop may be true. --Ronichu 09:59, 2 June 2011 (PDT)