Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Improvement"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: The idea is to put this on the front page in a way that will spotlight articles that have potential but could use improvement. There's a lot of excellent articles here like Homos and [...) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The idea is to put this on the front page in a way that will spotlight articles that have potential but could use improvement. There's a lot of excellent articles here like [[Homos]] and [[Excel-Saga]] and there can be more articles like these. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 08:43, 10 April 2009 (CEST) | The idea is to put this on the front page in a way that will spotlight articles that have potential but could use improvement. There's a lot of excellent articles here like [[Homos]] and [[Excel-Saga]] and there can be more articles like these. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 08:43, 10 April 2009 (CEST) | ||
==Emily== | |||
I think the [[Emily]] article has gone almost as far as it can go. Might I suggest an article like [[sex tape]] that is less shrouded in secrecy? --[[User:Delabonte|Delabonte]] 05:42, 6 May 2009 (CEST) | |||
Revision as of 22:42, 5 May 2009
The idea is to put this on the front page in a way that will spotlight articles that have potential but could use improvement. There's a lot of excellent articles here like Homos and Excel-Saga and there can be more articles like these. --Champthom 08:43, 10 April 2009 (CEST)
Emily
I think the Emily article has gone almost as far as it can go. Might I suggest an article like sex tape that is less shrouded in secrecy? --Delabonte 05:42, 6 May 2009 (CEST)