Difference between revisions of "Talk:/cow/"

From CWCki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 87: Line 87:
Can't load the page. what up?--[[User:Wintermute|Wintermute]] 18:15, 24 October 2010 (PDT)
Can't load the page. what up?--[[User:Wintermute|Wintermute]] 18:15, 24 October 2010 (PDT)
* IRC topic: "789 might go down due to a shitty registrar. Should be back up soon. --[[User:Schuzrum-dias|Schuzrum Dias]] 20:18, 24 October 2010 (PDT)
* IRC topic: "789 might go down due to a shitty registrar. Should be back up soon. --[[User:Schuzrum-dias|Schuzrum Dias]] 20:18, 24 October 2010 (PDT)
== Looks like it's done boys. ==
The page is gone, the admin is tired of it. :(
[[User:Jaekssss|Jaekssss]] 05:33, 21 November 2012 (PST)

Revision as of 08:33, 21 November 2012

so okay

This thing hasn't really been updated in while, so I switched some shit around. Keep in mind I'm was working from memory (posts are all gone), so details may be missing or inaccurate. Feel free to revert or whatever.--Jet 03:15, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Krapple guy suggested that there be a new article and frankly, I agree with him. Ideally let's keep namefaggotry out of this, as Krapple is now an established part of the CWC troll scene (consider the fact that the first reference to Ivy was on Krapple, and Ivy's first appearance was on Krapple as well, not to mention Clyde frequents the place). Really though, let's not make this a giant plug like the old article was about.

IMHO, this should strictly stick to what the site is about, and notable stuff that has happened on the board (read: first mention of Ivy, leaks, etc.). --Champthom 12:29, 9 May 2009 (CEST)

Should CEO & the *chan /cwc/ is hosted on have a slight mention as well? --Anonymous 14:42, 9 May 2009 (CEST)
  • Don't push it, nigger. ^^ But I agree this needs an article, it shouldn't really have been deleted in the first place. /cwc/ has delivered OC, and they are great when 110 is down. Also, krapple si a pretty cool guy. RachmaninovDESU 23:27, 9 May 2009 (CEST)

Goatee pic

Anyone know/can get a pic of Chris with his goatee? The "Let's get Chris to grow a beard" was a huge Krapple thing for a while so showing a pic so we can be like "OH SHI---------" would be good. --Champthom 00:29, 26 November 2009 (CET)

  • Would the video in which Chris shaves his goatee work? --Liquidcole 00:33, 26 November 2009 (CET)--Liquidcole
  • No, just a pic dude. We already have a link to a video but a pic so people don't have to watch the entire video would be good.--Champthom 00:42, 26 November 2009 (CET)

Date

Are we sure that it was opened on the 28th? It may just be my time zone (some websites compensate for them, I'm not sure if this is one of them), but the first new topic is dated for the 27th. --LizardPie 17:55, 28 August 2009 (CEST)

  • I made that edit so I could be wrong. By all means fix it. --Champthom 17:58, 28 August 2009 (CEST)

Deleted Forever?

This is all that's left of /cwc/ What happened? --Blazer 07:21, 2 November 2009 (CET)

Dear god... DEAR GOD, heres to hoping that this is a trick to fool the spammer into leaving.--El Presidente 07:23, 2 November 2009 (CET)

Any word if /cwc/ will come back? --Sack Thaddic 07:15, 4 November 2009 (CET)

All I know is that some 'furnigger' as he was referred to spammed the board repeatedly with furry porn. They traced his IP to Briton but beyond that no idea what is going on. Kast Iron 03:37, 5 November 2009 (CET)

furnigger is a term coined by former Patriotic Nigra N3X15 as an alternative to the commonly used furfag. All that aside, it has been assumed based on the evidence that the faggot who was spamming /cwc/ was a reject from this forum whose personal army request for a raid on said forum on KKK's /i/ was shot down. So he got butthurt and decided to spam /cwc/. I can't confirm or deny this at the moment but its the most plausible theory thus far based on the evidence.
As far as why Krapple was "deleted", I haven't the slightest clue. I assume its not perminant though since the other sub-sites are still up. --Anonymous 04:47, 5 November 2009 (CET)
  • Apparently this here http://legi0n.krapplekomputerkompany.com/l/ is the new /cwc/. Go out and spam to the extreme. RachmaninovDESU 04:50, 5 November 2009 (CET)
    • Apparently its not there anymore. 4plus2 13:00, 7 November 2009 (CET)
  • i'm not really sure what's going on with krapplekomputerkompany, but if you want to find out i guess you should go find krappleguy in his irc channel --cogsdev/vedsgoc 13:33, 7 November 2009 (CET)
  • Anyone have any news on anything? The entire boards have been taken down. If they are gone is there anywhere that non-pvcc people can go to discuss chris? Kast Iron 08:55, 8 November 2009 (CET)
  • Update: As far as I can til at this point, Krapple & the original /cwc/ board by extension, are both gone. However, /cwc/ lives (sort of). A new board has been made on KKK's sister site, Legi0n. [1] I appologize for any inconveniances and I'll let everyone know if/when I'm able to get in contact with CEO regarding this matter. --Anonymous 23:19, 8 November 2009 (CET)

Renaming

I think for technical reasons, this really has to be renamed to something like "Krapple." Not to deride them or anything, only that it seems when I try to like to the article as it is, it will go to the subpage "cwc" of whatever page is being linked. Like if I link to this on the Sonichu page, it'll go to the page Sonichu/cwc. We can keep it as it is, except remember we have to pipe it to "Krapple" but that's kinda silly. So any thoughts, maybe for a better name to rename it to? --Champthom 20:02, 30 November 2009 (CET)

Krapple Komputer Kompany? Legi0n? Chris-chan (Imageboard)? idk something like that maybe. --Anonymous 07:48, 1 December 2009 (CET)

Why link to legion deleted?

And references? RachmaninovDESU 23:09, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

  • Protection. Chris has passed over the site before, but we don't want him going back any time soon. --T K 19 23:17, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
  • Stupid, because even if Chris finds it it's too many words for him to read. Someone, revert it back. Seriously, people fucking nagging people in IRC or on here to "Where is /cwc/ now?" outweighs the remote chance that Chris is gonna find shit out. He already allegedly reads EDF, he's already discovered this place, Chris believes what he wants to believe. He still insists Ivy and Panda are real, even though CWCki more or less subtly hints at them being trolls. --Champthom 18:08, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Tainted soil.

Nobody should touch this place, seriously. We are highly notorious there since Edthehedgehog and his vandalized user page, and now we are prone to floods of inexperienced trolls who think Patti's corpse, tranny hookers, and JUUUUUUUUUUUULAY are still funny. Even I should be highly concerned as I stirred some RAGE. Pfargtl9000 Spam and Eggs 16:40, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

I've been the focus of the Chris-esque RAGE of the /cwc/ anonfags. Stay as far away from these mouthbreathers as possible. --MaxTehManyula 20:21, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
I am a furry, more precisely a Pokefur.
MaxTehManyula
Protip: Channers hate furfags, Max. --VanKrause 18:08, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

What happened?

Has anyone else here not been able to acess the site? Any time I click on a link to /cwc/, any link, it says it couldn't display the webpage. This has happened to me on two seperate computers. Is anyone else having the same problem? Has something happened to the site recently? --Edward 19:52, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

according to some dude on the IRC Channel the place got DDOSED by a love shy. Not sue how accurate that is--Wintermute 20:04, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

By a what now? --Edward 20:26, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

A Love Shy is basically a pathetic sexist loser who can't get any. Here's their forum. --BreadGod 20:42, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
So its a forum full of Chris-Chans then? --Edward 21:30, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
Yeah. We insulted them in an epic thread I suggested a raid which some people were gearing up to do then poof forums gone--Wintermute 23:24, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
Makes sense. Any chance of a restoration in sight? I had been meaning to check out the cxc board and check for updates. --Edward 23:58, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
I don't know --Wintermute 00:20, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Have any of them claimed responsibility? This seems unexpected from a group who have apparently only made one strike against their ED page. --LeninandMcCarthy 03:44, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

IT WASN'T THEM. It was some skiddie faggot who was pissed at an admin.--Spinningwindmill.gifDrSerbia Datass.jpg 18:41, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Website Disabled

Anyone else getting this message when to go to the /cwc/, Anyone know whats know whats going on? --Kota88 19:37, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

It's probably just a server issue or something.--Beat 20:08, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
  • Might be, Idk think is says in the legi0n IRC is being ddos'd by furrys or something meh probably just an error if what ever it says in the Irc might be old news for the what happened discussion above. --Kota88 20:14, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
    • I was talking to medic and the other mods (including myself)last night on skype. we got DDOSed by some faggot dont worry about it though--Wintermute 23:36, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Additions to Notable Goings-on

The recent wave of DDoSing and spamming, along with the creation of an ED article. CrassCrab 09:39, 12 August 2010 (PDT)

Going to create a separate section, "The End of Legi0n" to encompass all of that and the announcement that legi0n will be closing since it was all related to some extent. Will that work?--DrSerbia 18:24, 22 August 2010 (PDT)
Works perfectly.--Blazer 23:36, 22 August 2010 (PDT)

Did we go down?

Can't load the page. what up?--Wintermute 18:15, 24 October 2010 (PDT)

  • IRC topic: "789 might go down due to a shitty registrar. Should be back up soon. --Schuzrum Dias 20:18, 24 October 2010 (PDT)

Looks like it's done boys.

The page is gone, the admin is tired of it. :( Jaekssss 05:33, 21 November 2012 (PST)