Difference between revisions of "Talk:BABSCon"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
::The image appears to be from mcmiag, but that is the person Mare Gallery was replying to. [[User:Hurtful Truth Level|Hurtful Truth Level]] ([[User talk:Hurtful Truth Level|talk]]) 08:42, 31 March 2024 (EDT) | ::The image appears to be from mcmiag, but that is the person Mare Gallery was replying to. [[User:Hurtful Truth Level|Hurtful Truth Level]] ([[User talk:Hurtful Truth Level|talk]]) 08:42, 31 March 2024 (EDT) | ||
Should we write into the BABSCon article what Mare Gallery said, and hedge things by writing "alleged emails", etc? [[User:Hurtful Truth Level|Hurtful Truth Level]] ([[User talk:Hurtful Truth Level|talk]]) 08:52, 31 March 2024 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 07:52, 31 March 2024
Fake news claim
So a Twitter user posted the pic of emails between BABSCon and Chris and wrote, "The stories about the Mare Gallery party @ #BABSCON2024 are true. They have the babs email exchange with Chris-Chan framed. They also have a naked asian nigga laying on a table that you eat off of, like the evil rich white ppl in movies do, deadass" Then The Mare Gallery replied to the tweet and said, "This is all fake news". https://twitter.com/maregallery/status/1774401605229814081 Thoughts on this? Hurtful Truth Level (talk) 07:01, 31 March 2024 (EDT)
- What is the source for the image of the framed email exchange? Personally I would say anything posted to Twitter requires independent verification from at least two reliable outside sources. JinkiesJanke (talk) 08:05, 31 March 2024 (EDT)
- The image appears to be from mcmiag, but that is the person Mare Gallery was replying to. Hurtful Truth Level (talk) 08:42, 31 March 2024 (EDT)
Should we write into the BABSCon article what Mare Gallery said, and hedge things by writing "alleged emails", etc? Hurtful Truth Level (talk) 08:52, 31 March 2024 (EDT)