Difference between revisions of "CWCki talk:Priority Listing"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New section: Added two tasks) |
|||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
I try to do these things myself now and again, but I often forget. I hope you guys find this important enough to be included, also, I added it to ''high priority'', because otherwise nobody will give a damn. :3 [[User:RachmaninovDESU|RachmaninovDESU]] 05:39, 10 October 2009 (CEST) | I try to do these things myself now and again, but I often forget. I hope you guys find this important enough to be included, also, I added it to ''high priority'', because otherwise nobody will give a damn. :3 [[User:RachmaninovDESU|RachmaninovDESU]] 05:39, 10 October 2009 (CEST) | ||
*Well everything can't be a high priority because that cheapens what high priority is. Also, it's a good idea to do the bold text thing but some articles are so well written without this format. For instance, [[2007]] starts with "The year we made contact." It wouldn't work if it was "2007 was the year we made contact." Now it's alright to say "The year we made contact. 2007 was the year..." But sometimes for style, it's alright to have it in the second or even third sentence. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 08:02, 10 October 2009 (CEST) | |||
Revision as of 01:02, 10 October 2009
Okay, I made a list similar in the vein of Wikipedia's priority articles in terms of stuff that really needs to be done and what doesn't necessarily need to be done. Feel free to edit it as you see fit. --Champthom 21:40, 2 May 2009 (CEST)
Image Resizing
Anyone got a good batch image processing program? That could probably speed things up --Megaman 08:29, 26 July 2009 (CEST)
- Batch resizers don't give that good a balance between quality and such. No worries, I am working through the list and most of the larger files are done now. I should have the rest resized within a couple of days. Work permitting. --Fuckingstupid 11:59, 26 July 2009 (CEST)
- Why not just pay for some hosting that isn't completely shitty? Even $10 a month can get you some acceptable hosting, especially for a small site like this one. Fat Nigger 12:02, 26 July 2009 (CEST)
- Even with paid hosting, the size of some of these images is an inexcusable waste. --Fuckingstupid 15:18, 26 July 2009 (CEST)
- Why not just pay for some hosting that isn't completely shitty? Even $10 a month can get you some acceptable hosting, especially for a small site like this one. Fat Nigger 12:02, 26 July 2009 (CEST)
- IT'S DONE. --Fuckingstupid 03:08, 31 July 2009 (CEST)
Added two tasks
Namely:
- Make sure that every article has the article-name repeated in bold text, and then clarified, in the article's first scentence. (this makes the wiki more readable, and more professional. wikipedia always does it.)
- Add related pages sections to articles that can use them. This stimulates our visiters into further browsing. (as stated, people will get interested by this and start reading more)
I try to do these things myself now and again, but I often forget. I hope you guys find this important enough to be included, also, I added it to high priority, because otherwise nobody will give a damn. :3 RachmaninovDESU 05:39, 10 October 2009 (CEST)
- Well everything can't be a high priority because that cheapens what high priority is. Also, it's a good idea to do the bold text thing but some articles are so well written without this format. For instance, 2007 starts with "The year we made contact." It wouldn't work if it was "2007 was the year we made contact." Now it's alright to say "The year we made contact. 2007 was the year..." But sometimes for style, it's alright to have it in the second or even third sentence. --Champthom 08:02, 10 October 2009 (CEST)