Difference between revisions of "Talk:Mailbag 36"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Moral Orel: new section) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
I guess it's possible the whole thing flew right over Chris's head, but still.--[[User:Beat|Beat]] 07:25, 13 January 2010 (UTC) | I guess it's possible the whole thing flew right over Chris's head, but still.--[[User:Beat|Beat]] 07:25, 13 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
*Normally I discourage using CWCki [[CWCki:NOTAFORUM|as a forum]] but it seems that Chris fails to understand satire and is likely to draw lessons from Moral Orel literally (like that it's okay to practice witchcraft, it's the nudity of the undead that offends God). --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 07:30, 13 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:30, 13 January 2010
Okay then. Gone forever mailbag it is then.--Beat 05:02, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
Moral Orel
I'm honestly really surprised that Chris didn't hate the show. Moral Orel started as a blatant attack on the hypocritical aspects of modern Christianity, and ended as an incredibly depressing character study on people stuck in a life they despise. I found he whole show painful to watch.
I guess it's possible the whole thing flew right over Chris's head, but still.--Beat 07:25, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
- Normally I discourage using CWCki as a forum but it seems that Chris fails to understand satire and is likely to draw lessons from Moral Orel literally (like that it's okay to practice witchcraft, it's the nudity of the undead that offends God). --Champthom 07:30, 13 January 2010 (UTC)