User talk:YawningSquirtleRedux

This user is shit at tags. This is here in anticipation of being called out for my general tag-shitness.

Death of the strikethrough

Good job, squirtle. Strikeouts are just as st00pid here as they are on, say, ED. They should be eliminated on sight be replaced with something funnier. Apostrophe 19:53, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

• Score --YawningSquirtleRedux 19:54, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

• I'm also working on removing piped links to lie and fail because they're full of fail too and in part because I really want to be a jerkop. Apostrophe 19:57, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

• Yeah, I saw, I've started doing that too. I've missed some, but I'll get them when I go back around- I'm cleaning up Mumble chats at the minute. It's pretty good stuff. The forces keeping CWCki legible. --YawningSquirtleRedux 20:04, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Fail

What do you think of Lie? Same thing? Apostrophe 23:21, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, it's very EDish really, and something that gets to me a bit, as it was a really frequent pipe. It's been covered elsewhere, and we all know that Chris lies out of his arse. If it could be cleverly rewritten, then yeah, cool. But I don't think it will be. --YawningSquirtleRedux 00:29, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Meh. Lie and Fail were the only two I was really after since it seemed like every article had over 9000 links to at least one of the two. Then I saw that the lie and fail pages were full of fail themselves, so I figured, why not get to the root of the problem? Apostrophe 00:56, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Good call. Are we going to hit it with a redirect then? --YawningSquirtleRedux 00:57, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

A redirect seems like it wouldn't particularly discourage the addition of unnecessary pipe-age. Apostrophe 01:25, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Good point. Time to save the save worthy bits then in that case. --01:28, 21 March 2010 (UTC)