Talk:The Hook Cafe

From CWCki
Revision as of 23:45, 5 April 2010 by MoarLurk (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

I'll set to putting together a summary of this, I guess. Dkaien 22:38, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

  • The current format sucks (no offense). We need to mirror the content - the last Hook Cafe ad Chris had is forever lost in time, so now we need to mirror this for when this inevitably gets hacked. --Champthom 22:52, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
  • So you want it all replicated word-for-word? Easily done. Dkaien 22:55, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
  • And it's...yep, home to the John Tesh show. Weird. So far as I can tell this is like a station for 35-year-old women. Dkaien 23:08, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
  • I think the numerous John Tesh references (at least the times he's popped up in the background of calls) might warrant an article for the guy.--Champthom 23:17, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
  • I was about to say the exact same thing. Especially since he probably provided the germ for Chris's fixation on the three-date rule. Dkaien 23:18, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Oh god.... Anyway he's aiming a little high isn't he? Dkd 23:38, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

  • Only if you mean him not accepting anyone: over age 28, overweight, mature, or of any ethnicity other than white. --Caboose -1 23:41, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
  • I just noticed the "blacks need not apply part

Dkd 23:45, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

  • Well... at least he's saying 21 instead of 18. That's almost like progress. Almost.--Beat 23:48, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
    • I have to wonder if he found out about the "half your age plus seven" rule that people sometimes use to figure an appropriate age to date. Knowing Chris's tendency to take such things as written in stone rules... so yeah. Magic8Ball 00:57, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
  • As long as It keeps him from hitting on High School girls, I'm okay with it. The facebook messages he sent to that one 17 year old still make me shudder.--Beat 02:54, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
  • Welp, the little voice in my head told me to sign up in order to troll Chris, so I went for it...unfortunately, I need to have credits in order to establish communication. Should I abort and let a for real person do it instead? SniperFire16
    • How much is it gonna set you back?--Beat 03:10, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
    • Considering that a ninety day pass is $40.00USD, and I believe I have seventy bucks in my checking account, I think I should abort. Any thoughts? SniperFire16

UTC)

      • I created a fake account, paid for it, uploaded some bullshit and flirted with Chris. I also sent him an e-mail saying I'd upload a picture and my 'digits' as soon as I got home from school. No replies yet, but without a picture I probably won't get far. Unfortunately, I am stuck in Sydney airport with only an iPhone for Internet so I can't upload one right away. I will attempt to find a net cafe or something- this opportunity is too good to pass up. Ronichu 03:40, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
  • Damn it guys, stop trying to be the next bluespike, what is needed is a field agent to go on a date with Chris, and try to get even more info, who knows, it might be the return of the man in the pickle suit.Basgon 04:39, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

So should we do this for his other dating profiles too?

I mean, I'm looking at his OkCupid Profile right now. I'm pretty sure it's several years old, but even back then he still checked himself off as looking for casual sex.

Not that he'll ever get any.--Beat 03:15, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

Now that I think about it, probably the best way to do it would be to have one page titled "Dating sites" where we mirror his various awful dating profiles of fail.--Beat 03:17, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

Religion: None

That's unusual. I've said that Chris isn't a "Christian" in any real way before, but I know he self-identifies as one pretty strongly. It's really weird for him to list himself as "None, Christian". I guess it's possible he finally realized that openly Christian women typically aren't seeking casual sex, so this way he shows up on searches for people without religion, but its' still not very Chris-like at all.--Beat 04:00, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

•I noticed that as well. I didn't have any clue why he would do such a thing given his strong Christian identity, but the idea that he wants to show up on the searches of Godless Heathen Babes looking for sexy sweets rings true to me. The Fuck Quest overrides all other concerns, after all. Ronichu 04:07, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

  • There are 3 possible explanations. 1) He's a dumbass 2) He i s tired of being called upon, every time he does something that goes against the bible, so he now has an excuse of " nah i don't follow the bible directly" and still say " the homos are going to hell because the bible says so". 3)He doesn't want to be with a woman that's too much into religion anymore, to not get the "abstinence" excuse to not have hankey pankey. Either way, it's because Chris had enough of religion for a while, since it's not helping him right now.Basgon 04:26, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
  • Not to rain on the parade, but I think there's a fourth explanation: since it says "Christian/Methodist" right there after "None," Chris might have just goofed up when he filled out whatever form or set of checkboxes that produced that part of the profile. Dkaien 04:41, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
  • There's no way of knowing until Chris explains it himself, and the best way to do that is to put a huge ad on the CWCipedia accusing Chris of abandoning God and selling his soul to the devil.--MoarLurk 04:45, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://sonichu.com/w/index.php?title=Talk:The_Hook_Cafe&oldid=80530"