User talk:Dethchemist77

Gotta say,

You handled Episode 19 nicely. I was wondering how you were going to deal with the fucked up montage and "vision" sequence. The anus comment made me shit bricks. Now you gotta do 20 lol. --Jump 23:24, 10 August 2009 (CEST)

Asperchu

I saw your Asperchu audiobook, and I think you did an excellent job with that. I was wondering if you plan on doing any more in the future? --Edward 00:59, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

christmas

Are you and vivian ever going to do whate chris left of episode 11?

P.S: You and Vivitheg are fucking awesome!!! And i'm planning on making a TVtropes page on the audiobooks but wish for your previous consent.J0haely 04:04, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Welcome back my friend.

good to see you back. -- Clyde 00:13, 15 November 2010 (PST)

Deletion categ

The deletion category is a hidden one, and the {{delete}} ^(Usage) template will add it to articles automagically. You can adjust your preferences to show hidden categories - see Special:Preferences and look at the Appearance tab. --Anonymax 19:59, 19 November 2010 (PST)

Ah, I found it. That should help. Thanks.

Can you read some cwcville library pms?

The Cwcville Library through out it's creation has been getting tons of private messages from people who were retarded to think that the channel was actually chris' youtube profile. The archive channel has alot of fail troll attempts, gal pal proposals and possibly failed white knight attempts. Please respond if you're available to do this or not.If we could talk about this on your youtube or something, that'd be appreciatedSurfShackTito 11:53, 21 November 2010 (PST)

Sounds like fun. Do you want me to PM the Cwcville Library channel or a different one? Dethchemist77 13:04, 21 November 2010 (PST)

• pm the cwcville library, i'll get her to send you the pms. SurfShackTito 13:42, 21 November 2010 (PST)

Documentation

Absolutely super work on adding documentation o_O. I personally dislike the documentation template, it should be burned, because it's hella ugly. {{usage}} ^(Usage) is a far nicer way to add usage instructions to templates. Please don't add a bunch of empty documentation templates - it's really quite pointless. --Anonymax 21:33, 26 November 2010 (PST)

• About halfway into trying to categorize templates on the Special Pages, I realized I was doing it wrong and had to clean up my mess. Creating doc pages was the first solution I came across. Eventually, I plan on reviewing the templates category as a whole to clear any dead wood, so if you want the /doc pages removed, I can work on that while I'm at it. Dethchemist77 21:46, 26 November 2010 (PST)