Difference between revisions of "Talk:2013"

From CWCki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
==why am important??==
==why am important??==
*  Chris uploaded another photo on Febuary 1 [[http://m.facebook.com/pages/Christian-Weston-Chandler/167832525915?id=167832525915&_rdr]]
*  Chris uploaded another photo on Febuary 1 [[http://m.facebook.com/pages/Christian-Weston-Chandler/167832525915?id=167832525915&_rdr]] [[User:14recinez|14recinez]] 17:50, 23 Febuary 2013  (EST)
Who cares that the DSM-V is coming out, unless the APA is reclassifying high-function autism as something else? If that is the case, we should make a note of it. [[User:Giantgroundsloth|Giantgroundsloth]] 19:27, 20 January 2012 (PST)
Who cares that the DSM-V is coming out, unless the APA is reclassifying high-function autism as something else? If that is the case, we should make a note of it. [[User:Giantgroundsloth|Giantgroundsloth]] 19:27, 20 January 2012 (PST)
*I really don't see why this is relevant to Chris, it's interesting, and I understand that they're redefining Asperger syndrome but unless Chris mentions it, it really doesn't belong here. It comes off as filler. Seriously, we've got a year, we don't need an entire page to 2013 yet. Hell, Chris might die this year or go to prison or something, we might not even need a 2013 page. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 05:48, 21 January 2012 (PST)
*I really don't see why this is relevant to Chris, it's interesting, and I understand that they're redefining Asperger syndrome but unless Chris mentions it, it really doesn't belong here. It comes off as filler. Seriously, we've got a year, we don't need an entire page to 2013 yet. Hell, Chris might die this year or go to prison or something, we might not even need a 2013 page. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 05:48, 21 January 2012 (PST)

Revision as of 18:47, 23 February 2013

why am important??

  • Chris uploaded another photo on Febuary 1 [[1]] 14recinez 17:50, 23 Febuary 2013 (EST)

Who cares that the DSM-V is coming out, unless the APA is reclassifying high-function autism as something else? If that is the case, we should make a note of it. Giantgroundsloth 19:27, 20 January 2012 (PST)

  • I really don't see why this is relevant to Chris, it's interesting, and I understand that they're redefining Asperger syndrome but unless Chris mentions it, it really doesn't belong here. It comes off as filler. Seriously, we've got a year, we don't need an entire page to 2013 yet. Hell, Chris might die this year or go to prison or something, we might not even need a 2013 page. --Champthom 05:48, 21 January 2012 (PST)
    • Seriously though, this page is really unnecessary. The only two events listed are birthdays. Why should we not then create a page for 2014 (Chris turns 31, Barb turns 73) and for 2015 and for 2016 and so on ad infinitum? Why not just delete it? Giantgroundsloth 16:35, 22 January 2012 (PST)
  • Good thinking, I don't know why I didn't see that. But since it's almost 2013, I think we should stop making articles for individual months, unless Chris comes back to the Internet which I highly doubt. So instead of linking to January 2013, we'd just make a subsection on this page, i.e. 2013#January. --Champthom 01:24, 30 December 2012 (PST)

Probation

Due to Chris's probation ending on the July 10th, I think I should be worth noting that July 2013 might start up more of the Chris trolling as his community service ends, and assuming he wouldn't have learnt anything other than not to run people over. --The TRUE and HONEST Smugleaf Tsutarja 18:33, 25 January 2013 (PST)