Difference between revisions of "Talk:Lovely Weather"
Needlepants (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
Ladies and gentlemen, he have hit 88 miles an hour. We are witnessing some serious shit.--[[User:Blazer|Blazer]] 04:50, 7 January 2010 (UTC) | Ladies and gentlemen, he have hit 88 miles an hour. We are witnessing some serious shit.--[[User:Blazer|Blazer]] 04:50, 7 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
::* Yeah, that's about the jist of what I was getting at. (and I just remembered something about my thought experiment, it actually was that the theoretical couple was married in both time periods, still, it's uncannily similar.) .... The psuedotroll in me wonders if Future!Chris joined in on the fun. Present!Chris only said that he had sex with Future!Lovely, and never gave any details. Goddammit, I'm using fangirl notation.--[[User:Needlepants|Needlepants]] 06:13, 7 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:13, 7 January 2010
We have a picture of her now, Chris has discussed her and his traveling into the future and having sex with her as being not rape, in addition to her significance (the Bride of Chris) can warrant her own article now.
Maybe discuss the implications of him traveling into the future and then meeting his wife after he came back as ruining the laws of time as allowing it to affect his future, undermining free will. Maybe something about how this relates to the theory of time inevitability (see some episode of Doctor Who and also popularized in The Twilight Zone).--Champthom 14:25, 22 December 2009 (CET)
This whole thing is creepily similar to a ronery nerd fantasy involving a MILF and a 18 to [my age] boyfriend-free-girl thought experiment I had once, except both people fully knew that the other is from another time, etc. etc.. The entire question was basically: If you travel to the future and have sex with your future spouse, whom you had met in the present and were involved with (either romantically, sexually, or both), but not yet married them: Is that adultery?
I have a point here: In Chris' skull, he hasn't had sex 'outside' of marriage, because he's done his future wife, and in the time period his future-self is married to her. The fact that present-Chris hadn't even met her is irrelevant. I just need a less confusing way to word that. -- Needlepants 04:37, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Try to reword it here - you mean to say that Chris can get away with having sex with his future wife just because he will marry her and that, since he's married to her in the future, there's no problem with any possible repercussions.
...
Ladies and gentlemen, he have hit 88 miles an hour. We are witnessing some serious shit.--Blazer 04:50, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, that's about the jist of what I was getting at. (and I just remembered something about my thought experiment, it actually was that the theoretical couple was married in both time periods, still, it's uncannily similar.) .... The psuedotroll in me wonders if Future!Chris joined in on the fun. Present!Chris only said that he had sex with Future!Lovely, and never gave any details. Goddammit, I'm using fangirl notation.--Needlepants 06:13, 7 January 2010 (UTC)