Difference between revisions of "Talk:Self-inflicted taint wound"
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
Recently, a new section has been added explaining the risks Chris may experience. I feel these have already been adequately explained and this section is adherently redundant, but I'll let more experienced members decide wether it reveals anything new about Chris. | Recently, a new section has been added explaining the risks Chris may experience. I feel these have already been adequately explained and this section is adherently redundant, but I'll let more experienced members decide wether it reveals anything new about Chris. | ||
There is, however, a few points | There is, however, a few points the section made that I cannot ignore: | ||
"It's highly likely Chris is proud of his newfound "china" and probably will do nothing to clean it." This is a false equivalency. Chris isn't likely to clean the gash because he's unhygienic, not because he's proud of it. | "It's highly likely Chris is proud of his newfound "china" and probably will do nothing to clean it." This is a false equivalency. Chris isn't likely to clean the gash because he's unhygienic, not because he's proud of it. | ||
"It is exceedingly likely that he will therefore not recognize the onset of sepsis with any difference compared to his normal level of bodily dysfunction." While there's a '''possibility''' Chris's unhealthy lifestyle may obscure symptoms of septicemia, I think it's ludicrous to suggest that it's "exceedingly likely" that such a serious condition would go completely unnoticed. | "It is exceedingly likely that he will therefore not recognize the onset of sepsis with any difference compared to his normal level of bodily dysfunction." While there's a '''possibility''' Chris's unhealthy lifestyle may obscure symptoms of septicemia, I think it's ludicrous to suggest that it's "exceedingly likely" that such a serious condition would go completely unnoticed. | ||
Revision as of 20:48, 13 August 2016
The wild autistic, hatching out of its cocoon. Then promptly dying from bloodstream infection. --Researcher (talk) 03:03, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Self-inflicted?
I was lurking on the Kiwi Farms and I discovered on their thread about Chris getting worse, user dannyfrickenp posted a chatlog Marvin stating that the Un-clit 2.0 was a SELF-INFLICTED knife wound, that he was seeing a doctor, and that he was going to be fine: https://kiwifar.ms/threads/is-chris-getting-worse.23289/#post-1666061 Should this be treated as legit or is more info needed to confirm?
-Windows OS (talk) 03:27, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
I think you can include it in the article. Maybe just cite it as being from an insider source that was leaked to KF, post the relevant lines from that chat and let the readers decide on the legitimacy for themselves. Hurtful Truth Level (talk) 08:24, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
Editing "The Risks" section
Recently, a new section has been added explaining the risks Chris may experience. I feel these have already been adequately explained and this section is adherently redundant, but I'll let more experienced members decide wether it reveals anything new about Chris.
There is, however, a few points the section made that I cannot ignore:
"It's highly likely Chris is proud of his newfound "china" and probably will do nothing to clean it." This is a false equivalency. Chris isn't likely to clean the gash because he's unhygienic, not because he's proud of it.
"It is exceedingly likely that he will therefore not recognize the onset of sepsis with any difference compared to his normal level of bodily dysfunction." While there's a possibility Chris's unhealthy lifestyle may obscure symptoms of septicemia, I think it's ludicrous to suggest that it's "exceedingly likely" that such a serious condition would go completely unnoticed.