Difference between revisions of "User talk:Klop"

From CWCki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 10: Line 10:


In my opinion, it should be split into "Chris and biology", "Chris and physical science", and "Chris and technology".
In my opinion, it should be split into "Chris and biology", "Chris and physical science", and "Chris and technology".
: Sure add more to any section you like.
I was actually planning on making a singular "Chris and science" article which deals with Chris' relationship with science as a whole and make separate articles titled "Biology", "Physics" etc. For examples on how he treats each subject individually. This is to mainly not clutter up the CWCki with too many "Chris and " articles, I'm open to your thoughts on this. Also sign your posts - [[User:Klop|Your friendly neighbourhood Klop]] ([[User talk:Klop|talk]]) 07:54, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:54, 7 June 2020

Just a reminder

When posting a new section in the discussion sections, please post at the bottom-most part of the page. -Larry the Larryhog (talk) 01:23, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

Got it, I thought the newest section gets added to the bottom. Won't do it again. - Klop (talk) 02:09, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

The Science Article

Hi,

I would love to help out with the Chris and Science/Biology article.

In my opinion, it should be split into "Chris and biology", "Chris and physical science", and "Chris and technology".

Sure add more to any section you like.

I was actually planning on making a singular "Chris and science" article which deals with Chris' relationship with science as a whole and make separate articles titled "Biology", "Physics" etc. For examples on how he treats each subject individually. This is to mainly not clutter up the CWCki with too many "Chris and " articles, I'm open to your thoughts on this. Also sign your posts - Your friendly neighbourhood Klop (talk) 07:54, 7 June 2020 (UTC)