User talk:Edward

My talk page. Say whatever here.

And please: New section for each new subject.

Trolling Plans

my brother used to live one hour away from him, but moved. I'm sure there are many dedicated trolls who would be willing to carry out these plans. --Dan Dash 23:15, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Well then, If you can find someone then go for it. --Edward 03:21, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Mao

warn the chairman that cwc plans to curse him-Dan D

Lie

You might wanna check Talk:Fail. Yawning Squirtle Redux and I are thinking that it, too, should be deleted. I'm more than willing to pluck out the redlinks to both. Apostrophe 18:53, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

• I was well aware of that discussion. I was merely saying, that you're gonna be the one handling that. But if you are willing to sort it all out then thats fine. I'm not one to question a Grammar Nazi. You guys know what your doing. I just lurk here. --Edward 20:16, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

• Never mind. Champthom thinks this is a bad idea so I'm withdrawing. Apostrophe 20:43, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
  • Alright. Good luck with the piping genocide then. --Edward 20:47, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

This is not productive at all, BUUUT

I just wanted to say that Snake Eater is an amazing song and that you're awesome for liking it. --Lime 00:07, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

• Thanks. --Edward 01:05, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Article Plans

Asexuality doesn't need an article, as it doesn't fit into anything to do with Chris, beyond a passing mention (which it already has). If you want to update a subsection on something like Chris and sex then feel free, but really, there's nothing to say.--YawningSquirtleRedux 13:13, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

• Chris has made a few more statements than that before. I don't realy think that his attitudes towards asexuality would really fit in an article section about he is supposedly asexual. I think its a good choice of article to split off. --Edward 16:55, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Mark of Shame

Guess we've got that mark of shame forever. --Alcoholic Legend 17:02, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

• Yeah. I don't even do most of the shit that the tag is talking about. Cogs is just being unfair now. When all those /cwc/ trolls wanted to harass Edthehedgehog cause they thought he was a furry, CWCki protected him. Now I just screw around on twitter making jokes about killing Sonichu's kids and I get attacked by the head of the CWCki. --Edward 17:04, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
  • So are you saying that you are not, in fact, EmoWild? Because I am pretty sure you were one of the more irritating fuckers going on the Twitter feed. --Team CWCket 17:36, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
    • I didn't say I wasn't. I'm just saying that I never did any of the crap i'm being accused of in the box. I can tell you right now that I am definitely not a Sonichu fan. If you found me irritiating then that is your opinion. A good solution would be to not follow me. --Edward 17:42, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

• It's not that you are a furry at all, the difference between what was happening with Edthehedgehog and with you is that Edthehedgehog was being spammed by out-of-CWCki trolls. This is Cogs site, and the twitter thing is one of her pet hates. She delisted all of you from the CWCipedia twitter tracker a while back, which should have been enough of a clue that she didn't think it was a great idea. Also, all she did was put a userbox on your page (Which is now protected, so you're safe here), rather than post your details across your page with "I'M A FURRY" written on it. I'm sorry that she's tarred you like this, but you can't complain. --YawningSquirtleRedux 09:21, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

• Sure I can. I'm being puinished on CWCki for something that happened on another site. And I am not a furry. I was just pissing about with the whole EmoWild thing. It was part of a joke that was going on that started on the Asperpedia forums. I didn't do any of the furry sex shit that Sonichu1 was doing and I didn't spam the feed. I didn't even go on the feed. If I knew that Cogs of all people was going to act like this over something like that then I wouldn't have bothered with the whole thing. I just thought that she would be more mature about this. It wasn't affecting CWCki. It wasn't even affecting the CWCipedia feed since I was blocked out. So I don't see what the problem is. If she has a personal issue with it then she could have asked me to stop. I would have gladly stopped. Instead she put a big permenant button on my page telling people that I'm a Sonichu fan and that they should troll me. Her site or not, thats unfair. --Edward 15:33, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

• Yikes! I had no idea you were one of them.--Jewlay 17:51, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

• Don't act like its a big thing. I just spend a few minutes on Twitter each day pissing around. And i'm stopping that if it gets Cogs in a mood like this. I'm still just here to edit the articles and improve the site. It doesn't change anything. --Edward 18:14, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

• Alright look, I'll talk to Cogs about getting rid of it for you alright? At the end of the day, it makes no difference to me whatsoever what you choose to do outside of the CWCki unless it spills over onto here, like the Edthehedgehog saga did, which is why we stepped into help him. The twitter RPing was one of Cogs' bugbears, so it wasn't anything personal at all. I can't promise it'll go, but I'll try and plead your case alright? If it hadn't been a Sonichu RP, you'd have got away with it fine. --YawningSquirtleRedux 21:03, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

• Thank you. It means a lot to me. And tell her that i'll stop if she really hates it that much. I am a CWCki editor first and if i'm made to choose then I'd abandon the twitter thing instantly. --Edward 21:07, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

• My two cents: What the fuck? Clyde protected Ed, but now we've got Cogs trolling CWCki members. I seriously hope you guys get that template removed.

And as for that template? Moon plz, it's full of fail. Pfargtl9000 00:33, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

• Again: Thank you. --Edward 00:47, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

• Look at what I added to that template. Looks like a saga is about to start on the CWCki. Banfest '10, anyone? Pfargtl9000 00:56, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

• I think I know why she's mad; she was the one who pushed Twitter onto Chris, and then the feed got spammed. I don't know what she was expecting, but I would have expected something like that if I was in her position. Either way, it seems she got fed up with her own project and is taking it out on the people who spoiled it. Bill Lumburg 19:19, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

• Makes sense. She's grouchy because her plan failed. It failed almost as soon as it was put in though. I don't know why she's only just getting like this now. --Edward 19:49, 3 May 2010 (UTC)