Difference between revisions of "Talk:2013"

From CWCki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Failosophy: new section)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 14: Line 14:
We should probably add info on him being on Failosophy, and maybe create a page for it if Chris [[Encyclopedia Dramatica|goes bonkers about it]].
We should probably add info on him being on Failosophy, and maybe create a page for it if Chris [[Encyclopedia Dramatica|goes bonkers about it]].
--[[User:Skoodles|Skoodles]] 13:45, 15 March 2013 (PDT)
--[[User:Skoodles|Skoodles]] 13:45, 15 March 2013 (PDT)
He wrote a long FB comment about it, with a response from one of the hosts ( I think) and a bunch of other comments from his fans asking for more sonichu--[[User:CaseHa|CaseHa]] 17:51, 15 March 2013 (PDT)
== Splitting up article ==
Thinking about categorizing 2013 in terms of months; seems a bit out of place, when both 2012 and 2014 have already done so. [[User:Boomhauer|Boomhauer]] ([[User talk:Boomhauer|talk]]) 17:10, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 12:11, 11 October 2014

why am important??

  • Chris uploaded another photo on Febuary 1 [[1]] 14recinez 17:50, 23 Febuary 2013 (EST)

Who cares that the DSM-V is coming out, unless the APA is reclassifying high-function autism as something else? If that is the case, we should make a note of it. Giantgroundsloth 19:27, 20 January 2012 (PST)

  • I really don't see why this is relevant to Chris, it's interesting, and I understand that they're redefining Asperger syndrome but unless Chris mentions it, it really doesn't belong here. It comes off as filler. Seriously, we've got a year, we don't need an entire page to 2013 yet. Hell, Chris might die this year or go to prison or something, we might not even need a 2013 page. --Champthom 05:48, 21 January 2012 (PST)
    • Seriously though, this page is really unnecessary. The only two events listed are birthdays. Why should we not then create a page for 2014 (Chris turns 31, Barb turns 73) and for 2015 and for 2016 and so on ad infinitum? Why not just delete it? Giantgroundsloth 16:35, 22 January 2012 (PST)
  • Good thinking, I don't know why I didn't see that. But since it's almost 2013, I think we should stop making articles for individual months, unless Chris comes back to the Internet which I highly doubt. So instead of linking to January 2013, we'd just make a subsection on this page, i.e. 2013#January. --Champthom 01:24, 30 December 2012 (PST)

Probation

Due to Chris's probation ending on the July 10th, I think I should be worth noting that July 2013 might start up more of the Chris trolling as his community service ends, and assuming he wouldn't have learnt anything other than not to run people over. --The TRUE and HONEST Smugleaf Tsutarja 18:33, 25 January 2013 (PST)

  • Well we will just have to wait and see what happens. He has been extremly unactive recently. 14recinez 17:53, 23 Febuary 2013 (EST)

Failosophy

We should probably add info on him being on Failosophy, and maybe create a page for it if Chris goes bonkers about it. --Skoodles 13:45, 15 March 2013 (PDT) He wrote a long FB comment about it, with a response from one of the hosts ( I think) and a bunch of other comments from his fans asking for more sonichu--CaseHa 17:51, 15 March 2013 (PDT)

Splitting up article

Thinking about categorizing 2013 in terms of months; seems a bit out of place, when both 2012 and 2014 have already done so. Boomhauer (talk) 17:10, 11 October 2014 (UTC)