Difference between revisions of "Talk:July 25, 2014 Leaks"

From CWCki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:


:Doesn't Chris and prostitution just go under [[Chris and sex]]? They're both similar topics, and everything on prostitution is already there, last I checked. [[User:Lysistrata|Lysistrata]] ([[User talk:Lysistrata|talk]]) 21:19, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
:Doesn't Chris and prostitution just go under [[Chris and sex]]? They're both similar topics, and everything on prostitution is already there, last I checked. [[User:Lysistrata|Lysistrata]] ([[User talk:Lysistrata|talk]]) 21:19, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
:True, and there's definitely enough room for a brief of this article, as well, albeit the OkCupid page is probably more deserving. [[User:Boomhauer|Boomhauer]] ([[User talk:Boomhauer|talk]]) 22:55, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
::I say put it under the [[Chris and sex]] article, but let's see what's the content for the prostitution article so far and see whether it deserves its own page separately from the sex article. [[User:Alan Pardew|Alan Pardew]] ([[User talk:Alan Pardew|talk]]) 13:43, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 08:43, 8 September 2014

Idk what is this, but there's enough info for starting Chris and prostitution article for example... --Gunter (talk) 20:10, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Doesn't Chris and prostitution just go under Chris and sex? They're both similar topics, and everything on prostitution is already there, last I checked. Lysistrata (talk) 21:19, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
True, and there's definitely enough room for a brief of this article, as well, albeit the OkCupid page is probably more deserving. Boomhauer (talk) 22:55, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
I say put it under the Chris and sex article, but let's see what's the content for the prostitution article so far and see whether it deserves its own page separately from the sex article. Alan Pardew (talk) 13:43, 8 September 2014 (UTC)