Difference between revisions of "Talk:Rocky Shoemaker"

From CWCki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Did she die?: new section)
 
Line 62: Line 62:
:Really though, I don't think they're necessary to understand how they influence Chris.  For fuck's sake, MLW could have pressed charges on Chris but made him get help and even let him back in. Rocky is no saint but she's one of the more sympathetic characters. Although I'm not a moralfag, I'd like to respect their privacy, especially for putting up with such a terrible person. Besides, this is a Wiki about Chris, not about anyone.  Unless it's absolutely necessary to understanding Chris, I think we should leave their real-life identities out of it. [[User:Barry|Barry]] 12:11, 12 December 2011 (PST)
:Really though, I don't think they're necessary to understand how they influence Chris.  For fuck's sake, MLW could have pressed charges on Chris but made him get help and even let him back in. Rocky is no saint but she's one of the more sympathetic characters. Although I'm not a moralfag, I'd like to respect their privacy, especially for putting up with such a terrible person. Besides, this is a Wiki about Chris, not about anyone.  Unless it's absolutely necessary to understanding Chris, I think we should leave their real-life identities out of it. [[User:Barry|Barry]] 12:11, 12 December 2011 (PST)
::Half the MLW article and the whole Rocky article are based around their irl identity, so hiding it is pointless. The photos were also taken from public sources (The Rocky one, anyway. Not sure what the source for the MLW picture is), so I fail to see how these pictures violate their privacy. If you were removing dox, which we don't have, I'd understand; but these pictures are harmless and relevant, so I say they be put back. --[[User:T K 19|T K 19]] 12:49, 12 December 2011 (PST)
::Half the MLW article and the whole Rocky article are based around their irl identity, so hiding it is pointless. The photos were also taken from public sources (The Rocky one, anyway. Not sure what the source for the MLW picture is), so I fail to see how these pictures violate their privacy. If you were removing dox, which we don't have, I'd understand; but these pictures are harmless and relevant, so I say they be put back. --[[User:T K 19|T K 19]] 12:49, 12 December 2011 (PST)
== Did she die? ==
https://www.greeleytribune.com/2014/12/29/tributes-for-dec-28-2/

Latest revision as of 00:18, 6 July 2020

RAEP

Does anyone have that chatlog where Chris came in IRC as a "troll", dropping not-so-subtle hints about his desire to "force himself upon his authority figures" AKA Rocky. Virusys 05:02, 7 September 2009 (CEST)

well, that was easy. FRONT PAGE LOLOLOLOLOL http://cogsdev.110mb.com/cwcki/index.php/IRC_(23_July_2009) larrykoopa13 8:48, 4 October 2009 (CST)

  • Citation is definitely needed for "Rocky is aware of Chris' intention to rape her" Nullity

This woman is a mystery to me. I wonder why Chris listens to her up to some point and not to the rest of the world and why she supports him at all. Is she in any way attractive to him? A target for his Love/Fuck Quest? Are there any other sources where Chris mentions Rocky? --Hayate666 11:31, 8 October 2009 (CEST)

  • It's the same reason Chris listens to anyone on some points but not others - Chris listens to what he wants to hear and blocks out anything unpleasant (read: the truth). She supports him because that's her job - a counselor usually doesn't tell their client "You're a sick piece of shit" no matter how true it is, and even if they think it, they don't word it that way. I think she's middle aged or waaaaaaaaaaay past Chris's age range of acceptable women. --Champthom 11:56, 8 October 2009 (CEST)
    So was MLW and he still drew porn of her. Perhaps his desire to "force himself" upon authority figures removes all of his sexual conditions, e.g. for age and appearance, which makes all those "Chris wants to screw his mom" projections all the more horrifyingly possible. Ensign disposable 22:29, 8 October 2009 (CEST)
    NOOOO! The mental images! Anyway, I'd expect a halfway decent counsellor to at least discuss, if not confront him with, behaviour that isn't acceptable. That's what I would do at least. If my client would come to me smelling like something died, I would let him know and expect him to do something about it if he wanted to visit regularly. (true story btw) Since you know what happens when white knights try to diplomatically talk some sense into him, would that mean that Rocky never tried anything of the sort? Running interference with trolling plots doesn't seem nearly as important or obvious as telling him to shower regularly. Or do I get the wrong idea about what kind of counsellor Rocky is? If you want I can add a piece to the article discussing this. --Hayate666 09:58, 9 October 2009 (CEST)

Quitting the internet

Perhaps we should add a section about Rocky's determination to make Chris quit the internet forever. His C-Ya Later video definitely seems like Chris is being influenced into saying that he is quitting the internet, and it's likely that Rocky told Chris to delete the videos wherein Chris begs the Wallflower to come back to him and his disapproval of abstinence. --BreadGod 23:24, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

  • That is one big assumption that would influence people's perspective of Rocky. That's too big of an assumption to make. Furthermore, there's a lot of other factors. --Champthom 04:12, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
  • Rocky is the prime suspect. I suspect his orders were "DO NOT MENTION TROLLS IN ANY VIDEOS"--F ABSTINENCE made mention of Mao and so Rocky had him delete it. But I think Wallflower told Chris to delete all videos where he mentioned her--Chris, being a lazy fuck, only deleted the video where he put her penname in the title and not the ones where he used her actual name.--MoarLurk 04:42, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
  • No, I'm telling you guys are wrong. Trust me on this one. You're giving too much credit to Rocky when there's a lot of forces involved. --Champthom 01:13, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

Chris's new CWCipedia quote (URGENT)

Surprises always come up at one time or another, so expect the unexpected.

With that, I give little regards to the people who have proven themselves to be nothin' but a bunch of immature pranksters. Your mockery webpages/sites/ads/words/images all may as well evaporate back to nothing, because I'm Not Giving Them Attention At All. I am finding peace off of the internet.

That's it. Rocky definitely has something to do with this, and whatever it's doing, it's making Chris slowly disappear from the internet.

I direct you all to this. Effective immediately, this plan should go on, especially because Alec made this image:

Sonichu 11 Teaser.jpg

Pfargtl9000 04:07, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

It appears the plan is definitely underway. Excellent. --BreadGod 04:14, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
  • Please point out the signs, I only made up that plan after Alec put that up. Also, Chris isn't slowly disappearing, he's the same idiot he's always been and I know that that idiot will rage if we just push him a little more. His pretend-fight with Clyde in that one video is a fairly accurate example of how his rage works--he starts by acting like it's not having any effect, then becomes gradually annoyed as the insults escalate, until finally one pushes him over the edge and he starts churning out rage videos. Bonus points if we get him to make a video--Rocky may be monitoring his channel and if he makes a video directed at us she'll probably see it and discover that Chris disobeyed her order. Thus, we've sent our message to her--fuck off our manchild.
  • True... when he discovered the ED page, he lasted almost a year from this video to this one, where he released his bottled up tard rage and coined pedofork. Pfargtl9000 04:41, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
  • You guys give Rocky too much credit. Seriously, to the best of my knowledge, she has nothing to do with this or if she does she has little part. Believe it or not, Chris is capable of learning and he's like the retarded mouse who eventually learns that it's not a bad idea to touch the shocked cheese. However, he'll forget and touch the cheese again.
All in good time, gentlemen, all in good time things will play out.--Champthom 13:15, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
Still though, we don't want to lose our favourite manchild. We will want to get him back proper ASAP. Thats why we have the new ads and thats why we are debating tactics to get him to return. --Edward 13:32, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
I was going to call Chris tomorrow. I tried today but couldn't get through, I'll give it another crack tho and see if I can make it work. I'm about to go to bed, but I'll check this thread before I call him tomorrow; do we want me to mention the possibility that the webmaster might have to turn over the site to Alec because it's not making any money? If so, leave a few notes about what you want me to say and I'll mention them. If not, lemme know too and I won't mention it. --Ronichu
Updating a dead topic. I suggest waiting until a few days before the end of the month. At that point, Sysop will send Chris an email telling him that due to his inactivity, the other claimant to the Sonichu Copyright will gain partial control of the site if he fails to upload a set number of pages before the month is over. Said other claimant will also be able to allow in whoever he or she wants. He'll probably miss the email and lose some control over the website. Giving Alec an account would be brilliant, of course.--MoarLurk 04:29, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

Faggotry

Some low-functioning autistic recently threatened Rocky with death unless she got Chris to create more videos, which she evidently did not respond to. As a result, /cwc/ is pissed off, PVCC is (I assume, I can't get in) pissed off, and faggotry is abounding. My question is: Is this relevant enough to put into the article, or just ignore it? (dammit, I finally forgot to sign a post)WarOfTheBees 20:15, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

  • 'til Chris gets involved (Either by making videos or commenting on it) probably not. Mellowyellowsalvation 17:54, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Contact info

Due to the fact that retards have been making death threats to Rocky, we will not host her contact information here. Anybody that reposts the information will be banned. CrassCrab 09:49, 12 August 2010 (PDT)

Rocky Supports LBGT Rights

I got bored and googled Rocky's name. I found this Rocky supports gay rights. Is this important to this page? --Darkhorse816 18:34, 5 March 2011 (PST)

  • A sentence at best. Chris's church already has a disclaimer on it's site that say's it gay-affirming, so it only makes sense that their pastor is too. --SargentPickles 19:20, 5 March 2011 (PST)

Photos

I sure hope there's a better reason for removing the irl photos from this and the Mary Lee Walsh articles besides "not needed". --T K 19 10:38, 12 December 2011 (PST)

Really though, I don't think they're necessary to understand how they influence Chris. For fuck's sake, MLW could have pressed charges on Chris but made him get help and even let him back in. Rocky is no saint but she's one of the more sympathetic characters. Although I'm not a moralfag, I'd like to respect their privacy, especially for putting up with such a terrible person. Besides, this is a Wiki about Chris, not about anyone. Unless it's absolutely necessary to understanding Chris, I think we should leave their real-life identities out of it. Barry 12:11, 12 December 2011 (PST)
Half the MLW article and the whole Rocky article are based around their irl identity, so hiding it is pointless. The photos were also taken from public sources (The Rocky one, anyway. Not sure what the source for the MLW picture is), so I fail to see how these pictures violate their privacy. If you were removing dox, which we don't have, I'd understand; but these pictures are harmless and relevant, so I say they be put back. --T K 19 12:49, 12 December 2011 (PST)