Difference between revisions of "Talk:Trollin' stupid"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I don't think this warrants its own page. Thoughts? --[[User:Delabonte|Delabonte]] 06:44, 8 April 2010 (UTC) | I don't think this warrants its own page. Thoughts? --[[User:Delabonte|Delabonte]] 06:44, 8 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
*Me neither, this can easily go in [[Minor CWC-isms]]. But I'll open it up for discussion. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 23:03, 9 April 2010 (UTC) | *Me neither, this can easily go in [[Minor CWC-isms]]. But I'll open it up for discussion. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 23:03, 9 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
:* Upon reflection, that's fine by me. I just added it to the list there, feel free to zap this. [[User:Dkaien|Dkaien]] 00:22, 10 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
:**I think that it belongs in Minor CWCisms. Its not got much of a meaning behind it, its not entertaining, its not informative, and Chris has only used it a few times before. --[[User:Edward|Edward]] 01:10, 10 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 20:10, 9 April 2010
I don't think this warrants its own page. Thoughts? --Delabonte 06:44, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
- Me neither, this can easily go in Minor CWC-isms. But I'll open it up for discussion. --Champthom 23:03, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
- Upon reflection, that's fine by me. I just added it to the list there, feel free to zap this. Dkaien 00:22, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
- I think that it belongs in Minor CWCisms. Its not got much of a meaning behind it, its not entertaining, its not informative, and Chris has only used it a few times before. --Edward 01:10, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
- Upon reflection, that's fine by me. I just added it to the list there, feel free to zap this. Dkaien 00:22, 10 April 2010 (UTC)