User talk:Edward

My talk page. Say whatever here.

And please: New section for each new subject.

Trolling Plans

my brother used to live one hour away from him, but moved. I'm sure there are many dedicated trolls who would be willing to carry out these plans. --Dan Dash 23:15, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Well then, If you can find someone then go for it. --Edward 03:21, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Mao

warn the chairman that cwc plans to curse him-Dan D

Lie

You might wanna check Talk:Fail. Yawning Squirtle Redux and I are thinking that it, too, should be deleted. I'm more than willing to pluck out the redlinks to both. Apostrophe 18:53, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

• I was well aware of that discussion. I was merely saying, that you're gonna be the one handling that. But if you are willing to sort it all out then thats fine. I'm not one to question a Grammar Nazi. You guys know what your doing. I just lurk here. --Edward 20:16, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

• Never mind. Champthom thinks this is a bad idea so I'm withdrawing. Apostrophe 20:43, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
  • Alright. Good luck with the piping genocide then. --Edward 20:47, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

This is not productive at all, BUUUT

I just wanted to say that Snake Eater is an amazing song and that you're awesome for liking it. --Lime 00:07, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

• Thanks. --Edward 01:05, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Article Plans

Asexuality doesn't need an article, as it doesn't fit into anything to do with Chris, beyond a passing mention (which it already has). If you want to update a subsection on something like Chris and sex then feel free, but really, there's nothing to say.--YawningSquirtleRedux 13:13, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

• Chris has made a few more statements than that before. I don't realy think that his attitudes towards asexuality would really fit in an article section about he is supposedly asexual. I think its a good choice of article to split off. --Edward 16:55, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Mark of Shame

Guess we've got that mark of shame forever. --Alcoholic Legend 17:02, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

• Yeah. I don't even do most of the shit that the tag is talking about. Cogs is just being unfair now. When all those /cwc/ trolls wanted to harass Edthehedgehog cause they thought he was a furry, CWCki protected him. Now I just screw around on twitter making jokes about killing Sonichu's kids and I get attacked by the head of the CWCki. --Edward 17:04, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
  • So are you saying that you are not, in fact, EmoWild? Because I am pretty sure you were one of the more irritating fuckers going on the Twitter feed. --Team CWCket 17:36, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
    • I didn't say I wasn't. I'm just saying that I never did any of the crap i'm being accused of in the box. I can tell you right now that I am definitely not a Sonichu fan. If you found me irritiating then that is your opinion. A good solution would be to not follow me. --Edward 17:42, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

• It's not that you are a furry at all, the difference between what was happening with Edthehedgehog and with you is that Edthehedgehog was being spammed by out-of-CWCki trolls. This is Cogs site, and the twitter thing is one of her pet hates. She delisted all of you from the CWCipedia twitter tracker a while back, which should have been enough of a clue that she didn't think it was a great idea. Also, all she did was put a userbox on your page (Which is now protected, so you're safe here), rather than post your details across your page with "I'M A FURRY" written on it. I'm sorry that she's tarred you like this, but you can't complain. --YawningSquirtleRedux 09:21, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

• Sure I can. I'm being puinished on CWCki for something that happened on another site. And I am not a furry. I was just pissing about with the whole EmoWild thing. It was part of a joke that was going on that started on the Asperpedia forums. I didn't do any of the furry sex shit that Sonichu1 was doing and I didn't spam the feed. I didn't even go on the feed. If I knew that Cogs of all people was going to act like this over something like that then I wouldn't have bothered with the whole thing. I just thought that she would be more mature about this. It wasn't affecting CWCki. It wasn't even affecting the CWCipedia feed since I was blocked out. So I don't see what the problem is. If she has a personal issue with it then she could have asked me to stop. I would have gladly stopped. Instead she put a big permenant button on my page telling people that I'm a Sonichu fan and that they should troll me. Her site or not, thats unfair. --Edward 15:33, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

• Yikes! I had no idea you were one of them.--Jewlay 17:51, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

• Don't act like its a big thing. I just spend a few minutes on Twitter each day pissing around. And i'm stopping that if it gets Cogs in a mood like this. I'm still just here to edit the articles and improve the site. It doesn't change anything. --Edward 18:14, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

• Alright look, I'll talk to Cogs about getting rid of it for you alright? At the end of the day, it makes no difference to me whatsoever what you choose to do outside of the CWCki unless it spills over onto here, like the Edthehedgehog saga did, which is why we stepped into help him. The twitter RPing was one of Cogs' bugbears, so it wasn't anything personal at all. I can't promise it'll go, but I'll try and plead your case alright? If it hadn't been a Sonichu RP, you'd have got away with it fine. --YawningSquirtleRedux 21:03, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

• Thank you. It means a lot to me. And tell her that i'll stop if she really hates it that much. I am a CWCki editor first and if i'm made to choose then I'd abandon the twitter thing instantly. --Edward 21:07, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

• My two cents: What the fuck? Clyde protected Ed, but now we've got Cogs trolling CWCki members. I seriously hope you guys get that template removed.

And as for that template? Moon plz, it's full of fail. Pfargtl9000 00:33, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

• Again: Thank you. --Edward 00:47, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

• Look at what I added to that template. Looks like a saga is about to start on the CWCki. Banfest '10, anyone? Pfargtl9000 00:56, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

• I think I know why she's mad; she was the one who pushed Twitter onto Chris, and then the feed got spammed. I don't know what she was expecting, but I would have expected something like that if I was in her position. Either way, it seems she got fed up with her own project and is taking it out on the people who spoiled it. Bill Lumburg 19:19, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

• Makes sense. She's grouchy because her plan failed. It failed almost as soon as it was put in though. I don't know why she's only just getting like this now. --Edward 19:49, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

'New section for each new subject'

Quit pissing and moaning, you fucking crybabies. Don't you know how a society works? People will make fun of you. If you can laugh it off, you might earn some fucking respect. Your attitude about cogs is pissing me right off. This is cogs' place and that user box is lulzy. You might recognize that, if you actually had a working sense of humor. (I've read some of your articles -- you don't.)

By the way, Edward, nobody goes to the Asperpedia for the wiki. They only go there to read the latest comics, so stop shitting it up with your earnest, unfunny articles on minutiae. Just stop trying so fucking hard in general, will ya? You're making a ton of enemies.Squirrelbait 00:42, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

Well i'm sorry if I didn't quite feel like just staying quiet and letting Cogs walk all over me. I know its her site, and I respect that. That doesn't mean that I have to like her attitude about this whole thing. I think she is being immature, and I am allowed to hold an opinion on someone, contrary to your beliefs. I haven't insulted her, I haven't started a flame war, and I haven't gone around whining about how terrible it all is. All in all I think i've been putting up with all of this rather well. And as for you comments about my sense of humour, I would like to say that that comment box is not something that you are meant to laugh at. Cogs was being serious. And what is all this about Asperpedia now? Since when were the Asperpedia articles meant to be funny? I've just been documenting the events of the comics like was intended. They set up the site on a wiki format for a reason. If the sole purpose of the entire site was just the comics themselves then it wouldn't be a wiki format. Anyway, thats another subject altogether. You have a problem with my Asperpedia work then you can take it up with me there. --Edward 00:53, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

• You apparently saw my message instantly and replied within 15 minutes. What the fuck, dude, are you on here 24/7? As for the Asperpedia, it was set up as a wiki as a fucking JOKE, to troll Chris with something that looked like his cwcipedia. And YES, the Asperpedia was meant to be FUNNY. The fact that you call what you do there "work" is so goddamn sad I want to cry for you. I come here for the lulz, so I'm gonna say "peace" and back out of the room. Also, I'm beginning to suspect you may still be a teenager and thus, unable to accept the slightest criticism. Squirrelbait 01:11, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
  • You are right. I am a teenager. Criticism is not my problem though. My problem is that you are not criticising me. You are just outright insulting me. There is a difference. I expected an actual answer from you and what did I get? I'm supposedly sad for actually writing something for a wiki site, I apparantly spend all day and all night on the CWCki cause I gave you a quick reply, and I apparantly can't take criticism because I responded and didn't agree with everything you said. And of course I got the obligatory 'For the lulz' crap. If we're sharing our opinions of eachother, I think that you are just some eleven year old straight from ED, who has no clue what they are actually talking about, and didn't bother to check the facts before they got involved in an argument over them. --Edward 01:24, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

I can vouch for Edward on this; back on the asperpedia forums he didn't want to discuss his issues with cogs, so it's not like he's starting anything. Frankly I think cogs is overreacting too, Edward's involvement was minor compared to the real perpetrators, hardly worth locking down his userpage for something that he kept separate from CWCki. As for the asperpedia, Mao promoted him there and I'm fairly sure Alec's given him free reign to fill in the backstory. So far the owners have no problem with Edwards "unfunniness". Bill Lumburg 21:26, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks Bill. --Edward 22:14, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Re: Welcome Template

Not all templates are there to make the page they appear on cleaner in appearance. We should be using the welcome template to save ourselves having to copy the long body of the welcome message, by substituting. Substituting a template is easy, just add subst: after then opening {{ and the code from the template automagically gets placed on the page. The welcome template is too wordy at present, and could do with shortening. When substituting the welcome message appears to make a user's talk page messy, it has become too long.

It's also important to remember the purpose of the welcome message is to welcome new users. It looks like we put a lot less effort in to welcoming someone if they can see we simply linked them to a template. While they may later realise that it was simply a substituted template, the initial illusion is still quite a nice one to keep. --Anonymax 22:48, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

• Alright then. I'll take your word for that. You know what your talking about more than I do. I was just asking. --Edward 22:55, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Quick Question

Are the people involved involved with Sonichu the animated series supposed to be a little mean? (Redfeather specifically) user:BabyNeko

• They're not SUPPOSED to. Whether they even are or not is a matter of opinion. Apparantly they are rather unpopular on CWCki. I'm not too sure why. I haven't seen anything they have said to CWCki guys and haven't had any contact with them. I think its a namefag thing. I have spoke to Spazkid before. He's alright. He can be kind of an asshole when he gets upset, but he's alright if you catch him on a good day. Redfeather though I can't speak for. Oh, and sign your comments. --Edward 23:14, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Hey Ed

They did it. they fucking did it again! they hacked apserpedia and blocked pretty much everyone that was not an admin all the while talking about pvcc 4ever.J0haely 02:53, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

I'm not blocked. Weird. Edward, since Mao seems to be unresponsive, do you think you can do anything about this?L33tSilvie 04:03, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

No I can't. Believe me, i'd like to, but I can't. They have control of the admin accounts. If I did anything to oppose them then they could could not only ban me too, but even strip me of my current powers. Unless the real Mao gave me admin status too then I can't help. That they haven't banned me makes me think that they are just doing whatever they find funny. While I may have some powers on the site, believe me it's nothing much and anything I do is not official. I certainly don't have regular contact with the higherups. All I can do is wait for the real Mao to fix this shit. Until then i'm trying to lay low and hope that I can stay below the radar until I can unban you all and restore the pages once the site is back. --Edward 15:29, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Fuck yes. Thelieisacake 12:08, 26 June 2010 (UTC)