Difference between revisions of "Talk:Incest Leak Interview"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:The name of the caller is given in the call itself. I just chose not to include it because I feel he's likely going to be subject to getting a barrage of questions for an event he'd probably rather move on from. Plus, the caller is friends with [[the WCT]], who is controversial depending on who you ask. It's basically the same concern with [[the Suitress]] in a sense. [[User:PsychoNerd054|Psycho]] ([[User talk:PsychoNerd054|talk]]) 03:06, 26 April 2022 (UTC) | :The name of the caller is given in the call itself. I just chose not to include it because I feel he's likely going to be subject to getting a barrage of questions for an event he'd probably rather move on from. Plus, the caller is friends with [[the WCT]], who is controversial depending on who you ask. It's basically the same concern with [[the Suitress]] in a sense. [[User:PsychoNerd054|Psycho]] ([[User talk:PsychoNerd054|talk]]) 03:06, 26 April 2022 (UTC) | ||
::Well, he chose to be a participant in the event. I don't think it's necessary to censor it, especially when it's just his screenname. Also calling him a friend of The WCT implies that WCT had a hand in setting up the interview which if true would need a source. [[User:Hurtful Truth Level|Hurtful Truth Level]] ([[User talk:Hurtful Truth Level|talk]]) 03:15, 26 April 2022 (UTC) | |||
:Also, this likely isn't the full call. I'm not sure if it's actually circulated somewhere on an obscure part of Youtube. I'll probably add it if I can find it. [[User:PsychoNerd054|Psycho]] ([[User talk:PsychoNerd054|talk]]) 03:10, 26 April 2022 (UTC) | :Also, this likely isn't the full call. I'm not sure if it's actually circulated somewhere on an obscure part of Youtube. I'll probably add it if I can find it. [[User:PsychoNerd054|Psycho]] ([[User talk:PsychoNerd054|talk]]) 03:10, 26 April 2022 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:15, 25 April 2022
Interview
Is this the full interview, the 7 minutes? Also is there a reason the interviewer's name isn't mentioned? Hurtful Truth Level (talk) 03:04, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
- The name of the caller is given in the call itself. I just chose not to include it because I feel he's likely going to be subject to getting a barrage of questions for an event he'd probably rather move on from. Plus, the caller is friends with the WCT, who is controversial depending on who you ask. It's basically the same concern with the Suitress in a sense. Psycho (talk) 03:06, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
- Well, he chose to be a participant in the event. I don't think it's necessary to censor it, especially when it's just his screenname. Also calling him a friend of The WCT implies that WCT had a hand in setting up the interview which if true would need a source. Hurtful Truth Level (talk) 03:15, 26 April 2022 (UTC)