Difference between revisions of "Talk:Camerawork"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Griffintown (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
*Personally, I think this should be called "Chris and cinematography." 'Chris and" was abused for a while but that's mostly because we were getting very specific thing like "Chris and his relationship with his father" and stuff like that. Alternatively, we can summarize some of the stuff here and incorporate it into the [[PSEye]] article. In short, there is potential to having this information on the CWCki but 1) the current article title sucks and 2) this may or may not need an entire article dedicated to it. Thoughts? --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 04:43, 7 March 2010 (UTC) | *Personally, I think this should be called "Chris and cinematography." 'Chris and" was abused for a while but that's mostly because we were getting very specific thing like "Chris and his relationship with his father" and stuff like that. Alternatively, we can summarize some of the stuff here and incorporate it into the [[PSEye]] article. In short, there is potential to having this information on the CWCki but 1) the current article title sucks and 2) this may or may not need an entire article dedicated to it. Thoughts? --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 04:43, 7 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
:* It should go directly with the PSEye entry. I don't see enough material to match a "Chris And ..." article. [[User:Griffintown|Griffintown]] 05:03, 7 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:03, 7 March 2010
I don't think this page exists yet
I looked, and saw nothing about Chris's actually camerawork, so I started it up--Toughdog6789 05:19, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
- The "Chris And" designation is for large, broad concepts, like religion, language, government etc. This should be titled camerawork. That said, I'm not sure enough can be said about Chris's camerawork to merit a full article.
- Do we have an article that covers the utterly incompetent way Chris makes videos? This would fit in there perfectly. --Beat 06:20, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
- No, we don't have something like that. Might wanna put it in the YouTube article, though. Seriously, the guy has videos up the ying-yang on YT and they haven't been really talked about.--Blazer 06:33, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
- Anyone for merging this with the Youtube article?--Hieghts503 1:22 15 Febuary 2010 (CET)
- I was about to make "Chris and photography", but I was not sure of the title. I think "Camerawork" is good, because Chris fails on both motion picture and still picture endeavours... and not only on YouTube, but all other mediums he has managed to spew videos upon, starting from GameBoy Camera to home videos to DVDs. --wwwwolf (wake me when you need me) 21:06, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
- Personally, I think this should be called "Chris and cinematography." 'Chris and" was abused for a while but that's mostly because we were getting very specific thing like "Chris and his relationship with his father" and stuff like that. Alternatively, we can summarize some of the stuff here and incorporate it into the PSEye article. In short, there is potential to having this information on the CWCki but 1) the current article title sucks and 2) this may or may not need an entire article dedicated to it. Thoughts? --Champthom 04:43, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
- It should go directly with the PSEye entry. I don't see enough material to match a "Chris And ..." article. Griffintown 05:03, 7 March 2010 (UTC)