Difference between revisions of "Talk:Vanessa Saga"

From CWCki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: ==About the page== Alright, so some people might be pissed that this is a formal page. However, considering that Ivy and Vanessa are long over and this has been on CWCki for some time, on...)
 
Line 8: Line 8:


Robotnik, if you'd like to shed some light, please go ahead and do so. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 09:01, 10 June 2009 (CEST)
Robotnik, if you'd like to shed some light, please go ahead and do so. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 09:01, 10 June 2009 (CEST)
*I don't have much to add. You did a great job pulling the less relevant logs and I'm glad to see you left the commentary in because context is a real bitch when reading them.
The reason he gave me the logs in the first place is because I convinced him we went to James Madison University together via Facebook and he copypasta'd the conversations in real time to me over AIM.--[[User:Robotnik|Robotnik]] 09:37, 25 June 2009 (CEST)

Revision as of 02:37, 25 June 2009

About the page

Alright, so some people might be pissed that this is a formal page. However, considering that Ivy and Vanessa are long over and this has been on CWCki for some time, on Robotnik's subpage, it might as well be a formal article now. Not to mention now that most trolls hate Josh for factoring in the premature ending of Ivy, the fear of losing his cooperation is no longer a factor.

Personally, I'm concerned that this is not 100% verified but considering the fact that we know that Chris had a chat with Vanessa where he was unfaithful to Ivy, the fact a field agent confirmed that Josh was leaking these logs to whoever asked, that I can personally vouch for the authenticity of an e-mail on the original page, and the fact Clyde got pissed off at Robotnik (lol, no offense Clyde) seem to vouch for these.

If anyone has some major objections to this, by all means voice them. I feel that it's time that people know the whole story behind Vanessa.

Robotnik, if you'd like to shed some light, please go ahead and do so. --Champthom 09:01, 10 June 2009 (CEST)

  • I don't have much to add. You did a great job pulling the less relevant logs and I'm glad to see you left the commentary in because context is a real bitch when reading them.

The reason he gave me the logs in the first place is because I convinced him we went to James Madison University together via Facebook and he copypasta'd the conversations in real time to me over AIM.--Robotnik 09:37, 25 June 2009 (CEST)