Talk:Jackie E-mails

From CWCki
Revision as of 03:13, 28 September 2011 by Anonymax (talk | contribs) (→Robot: Reporting unavailable external link)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

1000 GET

Give or take, this should be the 1,000th CWCki article. Congratulations guys, it's you who have made the CWCki so damn great.--Champthom 04:27, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

  • Yay us! Also, relevant to the article, it seems like we kinda came in half way to the conversation. Was this a hook profile ad? If so, wow. Someone got through to him when many others didn't. If I can ask the author, what email of his did you mail, and where did you email from? -Ronichu 04:36, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
  • she already left a message through the community portal. Clydec 04:41, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
  • Cool, thanks Clyde. -Ronichu 04:47, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
  • Here's to 1,000 more! So is Jackie article worthy yet? Her community portal message (again) speaks volumes about how women view Chris, though I assume since this information isn't cwcanon, we'll have to wait until he makes I Need You Damian Antaria the Sequel.--AdderCress 05:57, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
  • A short page on Jackie might not be a bad idea. I mean, we have a page for Caitlin. Mostly document her Community portal post, stuff like that. --Champthom 06:27, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

So. He reveals the sign, the Pokemon, and the trolls all in one e-mail. Damn.--Beat 06:18, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

To do

  • Wikify

*Make them into level 2 headings (for easier citation of individual e-mails) [Done.] -Ronichu 08:31, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

  • Categorize
  • Incorporate material into other articles

--Champthom 06:28, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

E-mail address?

Do we know which e-mail address these went to? Chris doesn't seem to reply at all from his AOL one. -Ronichu 14:38, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

  • He doesn't reply to you if you send him an e-mail to his AOL account. If you have a wet china, however...--Champthom 16:58, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
  • I figured as much, I just wanted to make sure I wasn't doing it wrong. -Ronichu 18:50, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Dear god.

He just rambles on and on. I love how he brings up MLW, and the names of his pokemon without any sort of provoking. It's like he can't stop himself. --Beat 16:26, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

He's starving for attention. I guess the YASG is not paying enough in that sector. Promises of China also helps... Griffintown 23:29, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Random note

I guess a funny thing is that this person has the same first name as I do. ChaosAkita 21:12, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Adding another random note here: do we know anything about what Jackie looked like? I saw the "I guess I'm a suitable candidate for you, I have strong arms" line and something about that just screams "he's calling her fat" to me. Psychobabble 01:06, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

  • I don't know about that. We know Chris would go for it if she were, but he seems that enthusiastic about it it's possble she's not. I don't think she's been using Blanca style pictures, but even so. --YawningSquirtleRedux 01:11, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

White Knight

Is it really accurate to describe her as such in this article? She strikes me as an excellent and very subtle troll who pushes Chris's buttons at an early stage while making it seem incidental. - Liquid! 00:03, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

That's the vibe I'm getting, too... (I mean, come on, mistaking Asperchu for Chris's creations, when it has Alec's names all over the place? A coldly calculated berserk button press if there ever was one...) but either way, until we know for sure, it's hard to pass a definite judgment either way. Speculation isn't good until it's conclusive speculation. In my opinion, let's mention all unsubstantiated but logical theories we can think of, or mention none. =) --wwwwolf (wake me when you need me) 00:38, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
I say we just treat her like an innocent woman who had no idea what she was getting into, without labeling her has a troll or a white knight. It's the way she presented herself to us, and it's funnier.--Beat 01:32, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
  • Despite my Original Reaction and at the time most sound thoughts I am inclined to say that She Is A Dirty Dang Troll! HOWEVER, I do agree with Beat in that we should Keep Her that way. When in Doubt, which I Do Have due to my friggen Mental Block, just AGREE With Beat, it is Safer. -Ronichu 01:47, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
There's lots of evidence that she's a troll; note how she showed up just when we found out about Hook Cafe, she pushes his buttons CONSTANTLY, sometimes in really subtle ways ("people use stress as an excuse to not get anything done"), she pushes him hard to get more work done on comics and videos, she leaked the emails, etc. HOWEVER, Chris reads Cwcki, and we shouldn't post anything about her being a troll until we're sure it's all over. Should we? Sygerrik 14:59, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
  • As I mentioned to someone else, for the purposes of the narrative, Jackie is a real girl and we should treat her as such. Even if she is a troll, she is playing a girl named Jackie and we don't need to point out this fact because any intelligent person should realize this if they so wish to believe. But since we are mostly writing within Chris's point of view, Jackie is real.--Champthom 07:24, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
  • If I may make a humble suggestion, I do think we should do this in the future regarding trolls, except in unusual circumstances. For instance, the real identity of PandaHalo is really irrelevant to what happened; even if we somehow learned it and she/he was okay with us publishing that information, it doesn't add much to what went on. Julie/BlueSpike's real age, however, was very relevant. Jackie being a troll isn't relevant to what happened, especially since her 'real' self had no contact with Chris. -Ronichu 07:36, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Merging

I think it needs to be in two parts - three was a little redundant. But the article is a shade too long/messy as one. --Anonymax 19:20, 26 September 2010 (PDT)

Move

Can someone move this to "Jackie E-mails 1"? We have "Jackie Emails 4-23" but 1, 2, and 3 have different names. Freecell 09:20, 3 December 2010 (PST)

Since it's the "starter page" to the Jackie E-mails series, it can probably live without the 1 in the name. I created a redirect from it though for navigational purposes. --Anonymax 09:32, 3 December 2010 (PST)

Images, etc.

Is there a reason the images and other mentioned attachments aren't shown or linked to? Have they not been obtained or not "in play" (I also noticed the conspicuous absence of the JenkinsJinkies application vid on the cwciki)? I tried to find some of them elsewhere on the cwciki as I read along, such as the pictures drawn for Jackie with the Injun circle-jerk, etc., but to no avail.Rrosai 23:26, 26 December 2010 (PST)

Dead link

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--Anonymax 01:13, 28 September 2011 (PDT)

Retrieved from "http://sonichu.com/w/index.php?title=Talk:Jackie_E-mails&oldid=149180"