Talk:Other enablers

Title and Scope

I think this page is a very good idea but I'd suggest expanding it to everyone (important) who enables Chris's delusions for simplicity sake. For the idea guys I'd recommend doing a brief write up of them and emphasizing how they led the way for this type of behavior. I think Jacob Sockness may also fit under this, but as he genuinely believes in Chris's bullshit I'm not sure (perhpas there's room for an article on these types of people some time in the future (The Cult of CWC), only time will tell). As for the title, I think "Enablers of Chris's Delusions" would work be better. Beyond this, I feel the distinction between an enabler and a ween should be made clear. Finnegan (talk) 09:13, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

I think expanding the article's scope would pose an issue in that it would bury the enablers that don't already have their own articles. I intended it in the same vein as Misc E-mails or Other documents, for subjects that don't have enough for their own articles. I also think linking to the other enablers would be redundant since the Delusions and enablers template does so already. Agreed on the ween comparison; I'll add in a line on it. Hurtful Truth Level (talk) 16:48, 23 November 2019 (UTC)