Difference between revisions of "Talk:Abusive babysitter"

From CWCki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 11: Line 11:
::*Well it's a small article, which isn't necessarily bad. I think we should try to remind ourselves that just because it's small doesn't mean it doesn't warrant an article. Stubs should more or less be articles that are only a sentence long and there to get the ball holding.
::*Well it's a small article, which isn't necessarily bad. I think we should try to remind ourselves that just because it's small doesn't mean it doesn't warrant an article. Stubs should more or less be articles that are only a sentence long and there to get the ball holding.
:::Hasn't Chris mentioned the babysitter more than once? We need to list every instance Chris has mentioned her in any media that's available.--[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 17:18, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
:::Hasn't Chris mentioned the babysitter more than once? We need to list every instance Chris has mentioned her in any media that's available.--[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 17:18, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
== Note ==
After Chris discovers we know he's JenkinsJinkies add that the babysitter's name is "Roache".
Evidence- http://trollingtrain.10.forumer.com/viewtopic.php?t=17&start=30
And no, Chris is never going to check the discussion page of "Abusive babysitter" so saying he's JenkinsJenkies here is no big deal.--[[User:Hans Gruber|Hans Gruber]] 12:06, 6 September 2010 (PDT)

Revision as of 15:08, 6 September 2010

I got your message Champ, I guess I need to find a better excuse to RRAAAARLL. --Megaman 12:06, 10 May 2009 (CEST)

De-stubification

I might try and edit this into a full article. Wish me luck, gentlemen. --Blunderscore 17:11, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Good luck. I'll take a bash at it as well, once you're through --YawningSquirtleRedux 17:15, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
Okay, I tried my best (with the few sources there are). Basically I just elaborated on select parts. Unless the big guy reveals anything more about his babysitter, this article will forever remain a stub. --Blunderscore 17:24, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
  • Well it's a small article, which isn't necessarily bad. I think we should try to remind ourselves that just because it's small doesn't mean it doesn't warrant an article. Stubs should more or less be articles that are only a sentence long and there to get the ball holding.
Hasn't Chris mentioned the babysitter more than once? We need to list every instance Chris has mentioned her in any media that's available.--Champthom 17:18, 28 March 2010 (UTC)