Talk:CWCipedia

Man I wish Chris would stop

Thank god he's already half-way there! Ahahahahah. Clydec 03:02, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Redirected

Is it possible that the CWCipedia was redirected due to Chris's comments in his last video? --BreadGod 15:36, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

• Well, his last video reached the ED message board. This means "Open Season" on Chris's racist arse. Griffintown 16:25, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
• We'll know if it is replaced by either a message from the NAACP or if several ads involving giant black cocks suddenly show up. Still, the EDF pestering him seems to annoy Chris the most and this will set them off.--MoarLurk 17:42, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Mao is awesome

The impossible has been done people. Mao has defeated the CWCipedia Royal Navy and comandeered their vessle. This is a golden age for the pirates, and we shall rule the high seas forever! --Edward 21:51, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

I think shit might be getting real here folks.--Beat 22:40, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

I was talking about how that would be the best way to troll Chris today. Taking his property is the best way to piss him off, and about the only way at them moment. It'll blow Tito out of the water though... --YawningSquirtleRedux 23:22, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Vandalism galore. BTW, I uploaded all the images they used to vandalize the place. Pfargtl9000 03:57, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Chris never learns from the trolling, taking his CWCipedia wasn't probably a good thing for the CWCki, because the CWCipedia gave a lot of insight info about Chris. Probably Chris will crash into slumber once more and be inactive for a while.Basgon 14:17, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

We'll have to see. If the damage is too great then probably. Chris is not one for hard work, and there is quite alot to repair. I didn't think that this would happen on quite such a grand scale... --YawningSquirtleRedux 16:05, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

The damage IS too great. There's no way the CWCipedia can be restored without it becoming a clean slate, or it could be moved to this server. Anyway, the vandalism can be found here. Pfargtl9000 18:33, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

The CWCipedia became useless sometime around January when he gave up on mailbags, comic pages, character bio pages and was content on just sitting on his ass playing the PS3. In fact, when the vandalizing first started he was playing God of War III. Now he's playing Heavy Rain. So yeah. also archive: archive.cogsdev.org Clydec 19:24, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Fair point. He's probably not too bothered then --YawningSquirtleRedux 19:25, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Indeed, he'll probably just start up a new website with his monthly tugboat, and I guarantee that the new site will be hacked within days of its creation. The CWCipedia was the only place where Chris could safely post stuff that we could all laugh at. --BreadGod 20:12, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Odds on his return to cogs at some point? --YawningSquirtleRedux 20:23, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Maybe he'll try a site like deviantart once more, like cheezyart or something that is free and it's not hard to use, but in that case, he would get banned shortly.Basgon 20:31, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

If that is the case, then maybe it is in our best intrests to help restore CWCipedia? Thoughts? --Edward 21:41, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

I'm assuming (hoping) the the PVCC kept an archival copy of the CWCipedia before they invited us to go open season so us dedicated Christorians can reference all the insane crap he wrote. If not, well there's always the page histories. Lol, I'm dumb. Clyde put the archive up earlier on this very page. So now the intellegent thing to do would be to change the templates and cites that link to the CWCipedia to link to the archive instead.--Beat 21:44, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

And what of the future? Most of all our new info comes from CWCipedia. If thats gone and Chris has no place to put his homophobic rants, then where will our info come from? That Mailbag is a goldmine, and if not for trolls, we would still have a chance of him ansewing it. If Chris makes his own new site, I can promise you that there would not be a mailbag. --Edward 22:09, 20 March 2010 (UTC)