Difference between revisions of "Talk:Chris and electronics"
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
I'd like to know just how much of his internet usage is on that actual computer, and how much is off the PS3 (or even PSP)--[[User:Robotnik|Robotnik]] 19:03, 2 April 2010 (UTC) | I'd like to know just how much of his internet usage is on that actual computer, and how much is off the PS3 (or even PSP)--[[User:Robotnik|Robotnik]] 19:03, 2 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
==Piracy?== | |||
That part of the article is not only a guess, but it's a reach. The reasoning is just that Chris wouldn't spend money on Photoshop, therefore he torrented it. First of all, there are other possibilities (it could have been a gift), and secondly he absolutely would spend money on it. Why wouldn't he? He gets paid for doing nothing and has almost no inflexible expenses. The section even argues against itself by pointing out his general spending habits. Unless there's sources for piracy this section needs to go regardless of whether the rest of the article does. --[[User:Homeless prophet|Homeless prophet]] 05:44, 16 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:44, 16 June 2010
I dunno if this needs deletion, but it definitely needs to either get bigger or get zapped. The part about Chris's shit computer is really the only useful bit, the rest is just rehashed from other pages. Lemme at least add one thing that I was thinking about lately... Dkaien 17:07, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
- Ah, I didn't get to explain why. We need a citation of what his computer is, and frankly do we need a thing on 'netiquette"? And getting rid of that, do we need an article article on how Chris uses his computer? This could just go in the FAQ, really. The rest is just fluff. --Champthom 17:27, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
I'd like to know just how much of his internet usage is on that actual computer, and how much is off the PS3 (or even PSP)--Robotnik 19:03, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
Piracy?
That part of the article is not only a guess, but it's a reach. The reasoning is just that Chris wouldn't spend money on Photoshop, therefore he torrented it. First of all, there are other possibilities (it could have been a gift), and secondly he absolutely would spend money on it. Why wouldn't he? He gets paid for doing nothing and has almost no inflexible expenses. The section even argues against itself by pointing out his general spending habits. Unless there's sources for piracy this section needs to go regardless of whether the rest of the article does. --Homeless prophet 05:44, 16 June 2010 (UTC)