Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Failed verification"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Usage: explaining) |
(→Usage) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:I think it was meant for this (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Failed_verification) [[User:PsychoNerd054|PsychoNerd]] ([[User talk:PsychoNerd054|talk]]) 16:29, 6 October 2021 (UTC) | :I think it was meant for this (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Failed_verification) [[User:PsychoNerd054|PsychoNerd]] ([[User talk:PsychoNerd054|talk]]) 16:29, 6 October 2021 (UTC) | ||
::Yeah, it's just a warning that the source doesn't actually work as a source and should be replaced when possible. For example, the reason why I don't just delete the source and put in a {{cite}} in this passage: | ::Yeah, it's just a warning that the source doesn't actually work as a source and should be replaced when possible. For example, the reason why I don't just delete the source and put in a {{cite|nocat=true}} in this passage: | ||
{{quotebox|At the start of her fascination of Chris, it is believed that the Suitress, despite having been warned several times not to contact him, started to attempt to interact with Chris in 2020, to the point of begging him to reply back.<ref>[https://sonichu.com/cwcki/Red_vs_Blue_Reaction_Livestreams In Chris' Red vs. Blue Reaction Livestreams, the Suitress tried to get Chris' attention.]</ref>{{failed verification}} | {{quotebox|At the start of her fascination of Chris, it is believed that the Suitress, despite having been warned several times not to contact him, started to attempt to interact with Chris in 2020, to the point of begging him to reply back.<ref>[https://sonichu.com/cwcki/Red_vs_Blue_Reaction_Livestreams In Chris' Red vs. Blue Reaction Livestreams, the Suitress tried to get Chris' attention.]</ref>{{failed verification|nocat=true}} | ||
'''References''' | '''References''' | ||
<references/>}} | <references/>}} | ||
::Is because there's nothing in that actual page that clearly supports the claim, but I'm assuming something happens in the actual stream that shows it, but it's just not transcribed yet. The idea is that if someone transcribed the video, or if a better source was found, the notice would be removed. Sorry if that was unclear. --[[User:4CentUser|4CentUser]] ([[User talk:4CentUser|talk]]) 17:14, 6 October 2021 (UTC) | ::Is because there's nothing in that actual page that clearly supports the claim, but I'm assuming something happens in the actual stream that shows it, but it's just not transcribed yet. The idea is that if someone transcribed the video, or if a better source was found, the notice would be removed. Sorry if that was unclear. --[[User:4CentUser|4CentUser]] ([[User talk:4CentUser|talk]]) 17:14, 6 October 2021 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 15:57, 19 October 2021
Usage
When this is used, is it a sign to remove the claim? Hurtful Truth Level (talk) 16:10, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- I think it was meant for this (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Failed_verification) PsychoNerd (talk) 16:29, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- Yeah, it's just a warning that the source doesn't actually work as a source and should be replaced when possible. For example, the reason why I don't just delete the source and put in a [citation needed] in this passage:
| At the start of her fascination of Chris, it is believed that the Suitress, despite having been warned several times not to contact him, started to attempt to interact with Chris in 2020, to the point of begging him to reply back.[1][failed verification]
References |
- Is because there's nothing in that actual page that clearly supports the claim, but I'm assuming something happens in the actual stream that shows it, but it's just not transcribed yet. The idea is that if someone transcribed the video, or if a better source was found, the notice would be removed. Sorry if that was unclear. --4CentUser (talk) 17:14, 6 October 2021 (UTC)