Difference between revisions of "User talk:Trombonista"
(Chris's Personal Army of Chrisses, but the Chrisses' opinions differ.) |
|||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
:* Oh, right. Ok, can I get a retrospective one? --[[User:YawningSquirtleRedux|YawningSquirtleRedux]] 00:46, 1 April 2010 (UTC) | :* Oh, right. Ok, can I get a retrospective one? --[[User:YawningSquirtleRedux|YawningSquirtleRedux]] 00:46, 1 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
::*Thanks Trombonista :) --[[User:YawningSquirtleRedux|YawningSquirtleRedux]] 01:18, 1 April 2010 (UTC) | ::*Thanks Trombonista :) --[[User:YawningSquirtleRedux|YawningSquirtleRedux]] 01:18, 1 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
== Chris' -> Chris's == | |||
Hey mate, I saw the changes you made to Chris and Remorse (turning Chris' into Chris's) and I was about to fly into a tard rage and change it back, but I figured I should try and find a source before I did. Turns out you are right about how it should be; specifically, to the best of my now current understanding, if Chris's CWCipedia ever shows an article where Chris claims to speak for all Chrisses, and these collective Chrisses' voices say they don't want him to speak for them, then that is how it should be written. | |||
My head hurts now. | |||
Revision as of 00:23, 24 April 2010
You can talk to me here, or at la_trombonista on LJ.-trombonista
Thanks for the welcome, man. 8) - ABoredGameDev 13:21, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
Hey did I ever thank you for doing all that work in the IRC chats?
Because that was really awesome of you! Thanks a bunch!--Beat 22:35, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
Oi, you =
How come I never got a welcome pack? :( I'm disappointed --YawningSquirtleRedux 00:42, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
- You joined CWCki before I did.-trombonista 00:45, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
- Oh, right. Ok, can I get a retrospective one? --YawningSquirtleRedux 00:46, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks Trombonista :) --YawningSquirtleRedux 01:18, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
Chris' -> Chris's
Hey mate, I saw the changes you made to Chris and Remorse (turning Chris' into Chris's) and I was about to fly into a tard rage and change it back, but I figured I should try and find a source before I did. Turns out you are right about how it should be; specifically, to the best of my now current understanding, if Chris's CWCipedia ever shows an article where Chris claims to speak for all Chrisses, and these collective Chrisses' voices say they don't want him to speak for them, then that is how it should be written.
My head hurts now.