Difference between revisions of "Talk:Original Sonichu and Rosechu Drawing"
(→When you see it...: picsize) |
|||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Not A Forum}} [[User:Alan Pardew|Alan Pardew]] ([[User talk:Alan Pardew|talk]]) 15:02, 5 July 2014 (UTC) | |||
You know, people could buy it, then use it as fire wood, but nah, they are just ripping chris off, which is good way to troll but not the best.--[[User:Zimkiller1|Zimkiller1]] ([[User talk:Zimkiller1|talk]]) 04:01, 13 June 2014 (UTC) | You know, people could buy it, then use it as fire wood, but nah, they are just ripping chris off, which is good way to troll but not the best.--[[User:Zimkiller1|Zimkiller1]] ([[User talk:Zimkiller1|talk]]) 04:01, 13 June 2014 (UTC) | ||
Line 34: | Line 36: | ||
[[File:SonichuDrawingDUCK.jpg|center|300px]] | [[File:SonichuDrawingDUCK.jpg|center|300px]] | ||
== We need to incorporate the other original drawings into this article == | |||
This drawing is the first of about five original drawings that Chris has been trying to sell on Ebay. While this first one caused the most drama, it is no longer unique. I don't see why we need a second article which deals with the other drawings; or worse, separate articles for each stupid drawing. I propose that the title of this article be changed to something like "Original Artwork" or something like that. None of this content would need to be deleted or moved. We could just add new sections that deal with the other pieces. | |||
For the time being, just to get it out there, I am going to be proactive and add the information about the other drawings to this article. At worst, someone can cut-and-paste and move it to where they think it belongs. | |||
-asperhes |
Latest revision as of 14:11, 27 December 2014
Alan Pardew (talk) 15:02, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
You know, people could buy it, then use it as fire wood, but nah, they are just ripping chris off, which is good way to troll but not the best.--Zimkiller1 (talk) 04:01, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
What if...
Let's just say for the sake of argument that someone legitimately gave Chris a grand for this 8 1/2" x 11" piece, would they become a legend to trolls or someone to laugh at for pissing their money away on a piece of epic fail? Hunters108 12:18, 16 June 2014
He said, all not signing his post. But yeah, before the bidding jumped to $10,000, I was actually considering putting down no more than $250 for it. Dick Banton (talk) 18:01, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Actual profit?
What's sad is, if Chris wasn't a total egotist and just listed his artwork for, say, reasonable prices of like 10-20 bucks, swarms upon swarms of trolls would eat them up like crazy. And, I doubt both the material and "time" needed to create such artwork would be negligible to the profit margin and Chris could actually probably get a lot of money doing that. But, no, he's an egotistical retard, who only thinks "AS QUICK WITH AS LITTLE EFFORT AS POSSIBLE". He should be counting his lucky stars with the fact he can get ANY money at all for this godawful level of artwork, that couldn't be given away if it wasn't for his reputation.
That being said, I hope no one ever pays him for it, let alone gives him money. His whole crying remark of "MY MOTHER AND I REALLY NEED THE MONEY" is pissing me off; he, and everyone else, knows damn well he just wants to buy some severely overpriced Legos. What a waste of life. --The World Is Yours (talk) 23:22, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
-- I agree, The World Is Yours. Never in my life have I seen someone this desperate for Legos. Desperate to get the utilities turned back on for their family due to extenuating financial circumstances? Yes. But not for (based on average pricing for the sets he named in his May 29th Facebook post) $650 worth of plastic building blocks.Hunters108 02:40, 18 June 2014
Persephone?
Persephone was the daughter of Zeus and queen of the underworld in Greek mythology. How the fuck does Chris know about this? Dick Banton (talk) 07:38, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
Oh, phew
When I got an email from Ebay saying that it had been bought, I was sick to my stomach thinking someone literally gave Chris over 400 bucks for this thing, as, he had it set up where it could only be bought with immediate payment.
But after checking this site, I see 'how' it was bought. It was Chris, not a buyer. So, that's a bit of a relief. I highly doubt that offer was serious; apparently others offered even 'more', so yeah. I really hate seeing Chris' awful behavior get justified, so I really, sincerely hope no one was stupid enough to buy it for that kind of money.--The World Is Yours (talk) 15:52, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
Chris Isn't Bitching By Now?
It's been a few days since the item was allegedly bought. If the buyer is stalling, or shafted Chris, wouldn't he be going "GODDAMN TROLLS" and relisting the item? Does this mean that the buyer actually PAID for this? Dick Banton (talk) 04:52, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
When you see it...
Hmm...What the shit is on the top of the drawing? For me it looks like a Pikachu in the fetal position WITH FAT COCK. ---Chrissy Wankston Fagler (talk) 08:30, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
We need to incorporate the other original drawings into this article
This drawing is the first of about five original drawings that Chris has been trying to sell on Ebay. While this first one caused the most drama, it is no longer unique. I don't see why we need a second article which deals with the other drawings; or worse, separate articles for each stupid drawing. I propose that the title of this article be changed to something like "Original Artwork" or something like that. None of this content would need to be deleted or moved. We could just add new sections that deal with the other pieces.
For the time being, just to get it out there, I am going to be proactive and add the information about the other drawings to this article. At worst, someone can cut-and-paste and move it to where they think it belongs.
-asperhes