User talk:4CentUser

Refn

Nice work on adding the refn template. It's a neat addition. Hurtful Truth Level (talk) 23:50, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Thanks! I was trying to add a footnote with a reference inside it to the Randy Stair video transcript and realized it didn't work with the normal formatting, so I just imported it from Wikipedia. --4CentUser (talk) 19:24, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

Discord

Do you have an account on the CWCki server? Just feel we should talk for a bit. PsychoNerd (talk) 15:19, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

I don't, but I can join it if you want. --4CentUser (talk) 15:22, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

The Reversion of My Edits and the Subject of Cartoon and Anime Porn

On 22 October 2021‎, you decided to revert the edits I made on the "Chris and Sex" article. The sub page was "Cartoon and Anime" porn. Your reason was "literally none of this has anything to do with chris[sic]".

Now, I may have gone on wild tangents with that edit, maybe going into unnecessary history anime porn distribution in America(which, was for the sole sake of source citing and noteworthiness), and maybe I went on too long about one notable radio Shock Jock's opinion. But, the subject has a LOT to do with Chris and how he sees sex for simple factor. Chris is erotically aroused by Cartoons and Anime, and that makes him different from normal folks.

I don't wish to cause trouble here. In fact, I only come in the best of intentions, to keep this wiki alive and imbue it with the best useful information possible. So I'm just going to have a friendly argument with you over the subject of Cartoon and Anime porn and its possible hand in creating sexually disturbed weirdos, sexually disturbed weirdos like Chris.

I'll start off this debate by bringing up a copypasta from Encyclopedia Dramatica about a-log. In short, it was a long list of compare-and-contrast that was written in order to show that A-log and Chris are a lot alike(and also to show, that by list's normie trollish standards and logic, A-log was more pathetic then Chris because he was fatter and was still a virgin). The item on the list caught my attention was "both think cartoons are attractive, and see nothing wrong with that." The key words are that they "see nothing wrong with that", in contrast to normal folks, who don't see cartoon characters in a sexual light.

Chris looked at a Sailor Moon poster on his ceiling to "Stay Straight." And he made cartoon porn of his own creations for the sake of masturbating to them. I will repeat that although Sailor Moon has been joked about being boner inducing in anime fandom, the fact remains that the characters in that show are high school and junior high school girls, which means if a 27 year old was to look at the main character of that show and pop a boner, that makes that 27 year old a hebephile or an ephebiphile by definition respectively. At least according to this video by this genius 14 year old: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CmIMrPZGzP0

Lastly, back to the opinion of the shock jock. He makes more money than you or I, and he has friends everywhere. Howard Stern has watched and fapped to more pornography than you could ever imagine. He has interviewed an incredible amount of porn stars and kinky folks on his show. So, when this man says that cartoon masturbators disgust him, and that he considers himself superior to all cartoon masturbators on planet Earth, because is solely normal porn masturbator... Well, I think that says a lot, don't you think? How many do you know irl, admit that they fap to hentai? And how many of those are successful people with jobs and families? Aren't all of such are fat social invalids like Chris? -- TippyToesTommyTalarico

This is a lot to unpack, and I was originally going to give an elaborate point-by-point response, but I decided that's not worth it. No offense, but I'll just be completely honest about the reason why I reverted your edits: Your writing style is extremely unprofessional even by the standards of this site, you A-log like crazy in every sentence, and you go on at extreme length about subjects that do not deserve more than a few sentences. Just so it doesn't seem like I'm dismissing you out of hand, I'll briefly address your main points:

A more in-depth response

"Chris is erotically aroused by Cartoons and Anime, and that makes him different from normal folks. ... The key words are that they "see nothing wrong with that", in contrast to normal folks, who don't see cartoon characters in a sexual light." This is wild speculation and absurd at face value. The vast majority of weebs do not turn into incestuous rapists, and it's ludicrous to insinuate otherwise. "Chris looked at a Sailor Moon poster on his ceiling to "Stay Straight." And he made cartoon porn of his own creations for the sake of masturbating to them. [...] if a 27 year old was to look at the main character of that show and pop a boner, that makes that 27 year old a hebephile or an ephebiphile by definition respectively." Yes, Chris has always had bizarre sexual behaviors. This is not a new observation, and does not deserve an essay-sized explanation when a sentence or a paragraph would suffice. "[Stern] makes more money than you or I, and he has friends everywhere. Howard Stern has watched and fapped to more pornography than you could ever imagine. He has interviewed an incredible amount of porn stars and kinky folks on his show. So, when this man says that cartoon masturbators disgust him, and that he considers himself superior to all cartoon masturbators on planet Earth, because is solely normal porn masturbator... Well, I think that says a lot, don't you think?" Not really, no.

If I was assuming the worst, I probably would say you were using this site to vent about your own personal vendetta against weebs. I'm not saying that is what you're doing - and honestly, I don't really care. I don't really edit here much nowadays anyway. The main reason that I removed your edits is just that what I've seen of your prose is simply not good. --4CentUser (talk) 22:22, 4 November 2021 (UTC)