Difference between revisions of "Talk:9 February 2010"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
It would be nice to be able to refer back to the crazy crap Chris wrote there.--[[User:Beat|Beat]] 16:07, 9 February 2010 (UTC) | It would be nice to be able to refer back to the crazy crap Chris wrote there.--[[User:Beat|Beat]] 16:07, 9 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
*Ironic. Just a few days before It was locked I had considered copying the website. I decided against it though because I never thought it would be necessary. I now wish that I had gone ahead with it.--[[User:Edward|Edward]] 16:11, 9 February 2010 (UTC) | *Ironic. Just a few days before It was locked I had considered copying the website. I decided against it though because I never thought it would be necessary. I now wish that I had gone ahead with it.--[[User:Edward|Edward]] 16:11, 9 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
*Clyde should have. If not, I'LL STRANGLE THAT CLYDE CASH. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 17:22, 9 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:22, 9 February 2010
Someone saved the CWCipedia, right?
It would be nice to be able to refer back to the crazy crap Chris wrote there.--Beat 16:07, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
- Ironic. Just a few days before It was locked I had considered copying the website. I decided against it though because I never thought it would be necessary. I now wish that I had gone ahead with it.--Edward 16:11, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
- Clyde should have. If not, I'LL STRANGLE THAT CLYDE CASH. --Champthom 17:22, 9 February 2010 (UTC)