From CWCki
Jump to: navigation, search

I lol'd. Oh WOW.

Oh yeah, and I saw a Wikipedia page about him (not made by Chris) a few days ago but I think it got deleted. I should've took a screenshot or something when I had the chance. --Lime (Scold? | Undo?) 19:42, 3 May 2009 (CEST)

  • Oh wow indeed. And of everything wrong with all of this, the first thing coming to my mind is "does he actually think that's how you spell 'senior'?" Wow. Evang7 00:39, 4 May 2009 (CEST)

Just beautiful. So many questions answered. And wow, I thought he was the self-loathing kind of narcissist. "Noble Gentleman" indeed. --Jump 02:05, 4 May 2009 (CEST)

I think the profile should have its own page. Looks like Chris is going to be up to some good 'ol fashion antics on Wikipedia and it'll be hard to document them on the page as well. --Champthom 04:10, 4 May 2009 (CEST)

/agree, as of today, he re-uploaded his wikipeida profile with the only change being the removal of his picture and a "I hate ed" tag. There's going to be a lot on this page in the near future. --Megaman 04:15, 4 May 2009 (CEST)

  • Actually, I added the ED tag, to make it look more presentable to Wiki admins. The pic removal is probably because it got deleted from WikiCommons. But this version is genuine. --Champthom 05:00, 4 May 2009 (CEST)

Oh god, the video now on his old account where he yells about keeping the Wikipedia page up. He's a bigger cunt than I imagined. I swear I almost feel like he's trolling Wikipedia. And bringing up Anne Boleyn again. Ughhhhh Christian Weston Chandler. Evang7 05:47, 4 May 2009 (CEST)

From the letter:

it is HARDEST for me to get a job in a place that does background checks,
only to find that cursed E.D. Page those EVIL TROLLS created against me at the TOP of the

Is he actually looking for a job, or is he adding something else to his massive list of lies? --Pope Explosives 06:31, 4 May 2009 (CEST)

I'm personally just impressed that Chris has finally realized that the ED page could potentially affect his chances of getting job. Even if he's just saying this because he thinks Wikipedia will take pity on him for it, it's a greater level of insight than I thought he would ever achieve. Until now the only reason he seemed to mind the ED page was that women would read it and not want to have sex with him. Of course, writing his own history on Wikipedia doesn't counteract that any more than writing his own history on --MachPunch 07:46, 4 May 2009 (CEST)

Edited to add my re-uploading of the article to Wikipedia. --Garfield 07:35, 6 September 2009 (CEST)

What about a Chris and the Internet?

I read this article and I find it quite thin. The whole Wikipedia affair took only a fraction of the 'Net presence of Chris. Not enough to warrant an entry in the "Chris And ..." series. What I suggest is that we merge the texts related to ED, Wikipedia, Youtube and all his websites in one great article called "Chris and the Internet". This would keep his appearances on the web cleanly squared in a corner of the CWCki instead of all around. Griffintown 14:29, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, that's a good issue to tackle. We already have ample evidence here that Chris is not exactly a stellar net citizen, and he has demonstrated that on several websites. (I rambled about this in White knight article already.) Don't know if all of this needs to be merged, but an article about common themes in Chris's net behaviour would be good: how he (ab)uses websites he doesn't own, etc etc etc... --wwwwolf (wake me when you need me) 14:44, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

Fix this.

I honestly doubt that this is the real Megan Schroeder and Cole Smithey. Is it really worth noting some faggot tried to make another Chris article? Clydec 15:37, 2 October 2010 (PDT)

I'm pretty sure think it was Cole. --Sonijew is back 11:07, 3 October 2010 (PDT)

Dead link

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--Anonymax 19:34, 30 October 2011 (PDT)

Dead link 2

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--Anonymax 19:34, 30 October 2011 (PDT)

Related Account?

Has anybody seen this account before? DiqueButtis 11:28, 11 November 2011 (PST)

Nope, but it's nothing at all like what Chris writes. It's just a dumb troll who tried to get chris onto wikipedia a few years ago. --Elias 11:34, 11 November 2011 (PST)

Archive of the deletion discussion

Someone figure out how to include this on this page. Im just a fact finder not a writer.

Real or Fake?

I'm confused. If this was a troll posting on Wikipedia, then why did Chris himself recreate the User Page autobiography on the CWCipedia immediately after Wikipedia axed it? Why did he put a link to the Wikipedia article on his Sonichu Site? If this is an April Fools joke it's pretty dumb. --asperhes, 4/1/15

I assure you, it isn't. I believe Chris did indeed use a wikipedia account in an attempt to upload that article about himself, but User ChrisChanSonichu was confirmed to be a sockpuppet of a troll long ago. I'm stunned that no one else ever bothered to check that. --DawnDusk (talk) 07:26, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
So the autobiography was NOT on the User Page of User:ChrisChanSonichu? If not, then where was it? What was Chris's actual Wikipedia username? Obviously this autobiography, if nothing else, was written by Chris. This is all before my time, but the people who created these articles seem pretty confident that ChrisChanSonichu was the real mccoy. How did this error happen? Can we find out what Chris's actual username was? --asperhes, 4/1/15
*sigh* The link that DawnDusk used to argue that User:ChrisChanSonichu was not really Chris does not prove that this is indeed the case. When they mention that ChrisChanSonichu and other wikipedia accounts are sockpuppets, it's not meant as "not really Christian Weston Chandler", but rather that it is suspected that they were all operated by the same person (which may or may not be Chris). The wikipedia users discussing this case do make comments saying that they believe that ChrisChanSonichu is not really Chris, but they have no way of knowing this for certein. ChrisChanSonichu uploaded Chris's biography to his user page on 1 May 2009, and it was confirmed to be the work of real Chris a couple of days later when he released a video about this subject. I'm curious if DawnDusk mistake is honest or if this is an April Fools joke. - NegaCWC (talk) 09:38, 1 April 2015 (UTC)