Difference between revisions of "Talk:Halloween"

From CWCki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
Line 18: Line 18:


** http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/patronize        While you're definition isn't incorrect, I think most people usually think of definition #2 whenever this word is seen. Given what we know about Chris as well, with his *former* attitude toward homosexuals, the use of the word painted a very different picture at first glance. Can you see it now? --[[User:The World Is Yours|The World Is Yours]] ([[User talk:The World Is Yours|talk]]) 00:24, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
** http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/patronize        While you're definition isn't incorrect, I think most people usually think of definition #2 whenever this word is seen. Given what we know about Chris as well, with his *former* attitude toward homosexuals, the use of the word painted a very different picture at first glance. Can you see it now? --[[User:The World Is Yours|The World Is Yours]] ([[User talk:The World Is Yours|talk]]) 00:24, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
** Have to agree with The World Is Yours. [[Attraction sign|As]] [[Love Quest|much]] [[Fridays After Five|as]] Chris has had a reputation of patronizing near wherever he goes, it seems he may actually be enjoying himself, as of lately. Albeit, as shallow as it sounds, Chris is still pretty creepy in public, so I want to say a middle ground would be a good way of putting it. [[User:Boomhauer|Boomhauer]] ([[User talk:Boomhauer|talk]]) 00:51, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 19:52, 5 November 2014

2011

Chris did spend Halloween 2011 in jail, didn't he? The article says he got out on bail Nov. 4, 2011 after the incident and arrest Oct. 28, 2011. Did Chris spend his Halloween in a cell outside of 14 Branchland Court? and if so, shouldn't it be mentioned? --IwegalBadnik 00:55, 6 November 2011 (PDT)

If he was arrested on the 28th and bailed out 2 days later, he definitely didn't spend ALL of Halloween in jail, if any of it. Unless there's something I'm missing. Freecell (t/c) 07:39, 6 November 2011 (PST)

2014

When Chris said "70s lesbian chic," I think he meant the word that means "stylishness and elegance, typically of a specified kind" The noun that means female would be "chick" Therefore, the diction in this article isn't correct when it says "Chris spent Halloween 2014 patronizing the "Impulse Gay Social-Club" dressed as a "70s Lesbian Chic"."

Then again, this is Chris...he could have meant "chick" Thoughts? LOLlolcow (talk) 22:59, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

  • He posted "70s Lesbian Chic" on Facebook, so perhaps it's worth a [sic] mention. Alan Pardew (talk) 06:46, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
  • I never agreed "patronized" was the correct word to use after I read the Facebook posts. It made it seem like he went out to cause a riot, yet, he seemed perfectly content and happy being there. That's not "patronizing". --The World Is Yours (talk) 14:24, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
    • Um, what? Going to some establishment such as a bar and being a customer makes you a "patron" of the place, hence "patronizing". Where do you get the idea of being riotous from that? Nathan (talk) 19:27, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
    • http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/patronize While you're definition isn't incorrect, I think most people usually think of definition #2 whenever this word is seen. Given what we know about Chris as well, with his *former* attitude toward homosexuals, the use of the word painted a very different picture at first glance. Can you see it now? --The World Is Yours (talk) 00:24, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
    • Have to agree with The World Is Yours. As much as Chris has had a reputation of patronizing near wherever he goes, it seems he may actually be enjoying himself, as of lately. Albeit, as shallow as it sounds, Chris is still pretty creepy in public, so I want to say a middle ground would be a good way of putting it. Boomhauer (talk) 00:51, 6 November 2014 (UTC)