Difference between revisions of "Monty Python"

From CWCki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 35: Line 35:


==Gallery of things which are completely different==
==Gallery of things which are completely different==
<center>
<gallery>
<gallery>
Image:Monty-python-black-knight.jpg|You can see here how Chris has replicated the incredibly humourous dialogue... by numbering it.
Image:Monty-python-black-knight.jpg|You can see here how Chris has replicated the incredibly humourous dialogue... by numbering it.
Line 40: Line 41:
Image:Wavingarms.jpg|WAVING YOUR ARMS AROUND IS TOTALLY WHAT ERIC IDLE WOULD DO!!!
Image:Wavingarms.jpg|WAVING YOUR ARMS AROUND IS TOTALLY WHAT ERIC IDLE WOULD DO!!!
</gallery>
</gallery>
</center>
[[Category:Things Chris has ripped off]]
[[Category:Things Chris has ripped off]]

Revision as of 22:22, 30 October 2009

...And now for somecuppitydifferent!
Chris, trying to quote Monty Python through flapping aspie lips
Darkbind Sonichu butchers the Merried Seinor Comic; Chris butchers a once-funny joke.

Monty Python's Flying Circus is a British sketch-comedy TV series, created in the late 1960s by Graham Chapman, John Cleese, Terry Gilliam, Eric Idle, Terry Jones, and Michael Palin. It ran for five years on BBC2, becoming a phenomenon in Great Britain and later developing a strong cult following in the United States as well. The troupe followed up the TV show by producing three feature films, including the classic Monty Python and the Holy Grail.

Chris is a fan of the Monty Python comedy productions -- he's bought almost $50 worth of Python videos through his PlayStation Network account -- and as is the case with every other form of entertainment he enjoys, he views them as an excellent source of material to steal for his own comics and videos.

The show's sense of humor is difficult to categorize. It combines satire, surrealism, cultural references, the deft use of non sequitur, and liberal doses of vulgarity that often made it controversial in its time. One way to define the Python style of comedy, though, might be this: imagine if Chris's infamous random-access humor were actually somehow made funny.

Chris's interpretation

NOTICE THE CLEVER SET-UP DERIVING FROM A TURN OF PHRASE AND OTHE... oh no, you just stuck a fucking bear on your head.

Chris seems to have developed the notion that Monty Python involves putting something idiotic in a situation and this will make the scene funny. The fact that he believes this and makes it the basis of his random-access humour shows that he has little to no understanding of the finer facets of the show.

While not exactly highbrow, the show is quite masterful in its comedic devices. If we look at some of the more famous sketches such as The Spanish Inquisition, we see how the Monty Python crew start with what seems to be a humourous scene about jargon and a muffling accent is suddenly interrupted by a troupe of medieval clergymen who seek to extract confessions. All this deriving from the use of a language idiom in the beginning of what seemed to be a completely different scene. This is followed by increasingly more absurdist humour based on the inquisition members.

The formula of a normal situation which has become funny in its own right followed by absurdist humour coming directly out of the use of an idiom is totally lost on Chris. Instead he sees it as SOMEONE SHOUTED SOMETHING RANDOM, IT MUST BE FUNNY.

Even the phrase "...And now for something completely different" that Chris has borrowed ripped off completely mispronounced and massacred was used in the original sketches as a way to lead into new material, but remained ironic because the segue itself was completely different from the previous sketch. Instead Chris merely uses it to introduce more of his bullshit.

Attempts to be Pythonesque

No friends want to be in your naked, retarded re-enactments? Or even worse, no friends at all? No problem. Talking to clothes in a funny voices works just as well.

If CWCFlyingElephants is to be our guide to how Chris thinks Monty Python humour is constructed, then we are to believe that things can be funny by skipping around to several random clips with no set-up or basis (while naked no less). To top it off, Chris throws in bits of completely unrelated material from other comedy shows that have humour completely different from Monty Python such as South Park and Ed Edd n Eddy. The fact that these programs are all known for their own unique varieties of humour doesn't stop Chris from mashing them together in a retarded fashion that he thinks represents Monty Python.

In addition to not involving proper set-up, planning and generally anything clever to the comedy process, Chris also fails to realise that one character having dialogue is confusing. Whereas Monty Python will have either funny monologues related to one topic or derive humour from juxtaposing absurd with the normal, Chris just carries on a conversation with himself and loses all nuances of setting and context.

Actual ripoffs

Gags Chris has ripped from Python TV sketches and movies include:

  • The catchphrase "...And now for something completely different" (or "somecummpentydifferent" as Chris mispronounces it). This was a running gag on the Python TV shows, part punch line and part segue way. It would usually signal the end of a short bit of surreal imagery and lead into something new. In Chris's case, it's a sign that he's about to randomly access something "humorous." See CWCFlyingElephants.
  • The hedgehog that steals Jimmy Hill's teeth in Sonichu 10. He originally appeared in the "Piranha Brothers" sketch, where he was named "Spiny Norman," although he never showed any particular interest in false teeth. (Chris probably just fixates on anything hedgehog-related. He's obviously failing at both violence and sarcasm.)

Gallery of things which are completely different