Difference between revisions of "Talk:Shojo Beat"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Alan Pardew (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
I can't help but feel that the lead section of this article takes a nasty feminist perspective. I understand that the response to Chris's letter assumes this angle, but Chris didn't write anything particularly unreasonable, and for a wiki that tries to be [[Honest Content|neutral and unbiased]], this seems antagonistic. I'd appreciate any advice on improving it. -[[User:AReasonableMan|AReasonableMan]] ([[User talk:AReasonableMan|talk]]) 11:24, 16 September 2014 (UTC) | I can't help but feel that the lead section of this article takes a nasty feminist perspective. I understand that the response to Chris's letter assumes this angle, but Chris didn't write anything particularly unreasonable, and for a wiki that tries to be [[Honest Content|neutral and unbiased]], this seems antagonistic. I'd appreciate any advice on improving it. -[[User:AReasonableMan|AReasonableMan]] ([[User talk:AReasonableMan|talk]]) 11:24, 16 September 2014 (UTC) | ||
:Never mind, I did it myself. -[[User:AReasonableMan|AReasonableMan]] ([[User talk:AReasonableMan|talk]]) 14:58, 16 September 2014 (UTC) | :Never mind, I did it myself. -[[User:AReasonableMan|AReasonableMan]] ([[User talk:AReasonableMan|talk]]) 14:58, 16 September 2014 (UTC) | ||
::Thanks for removing unnecessary bashing for this article. Keep it up. [[User:Alan Pardew|Alan Pardew]] ([[User talk:Alan Pardew|talk]]) 07:06, 19 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:06, 19 September 2014
Should we just crop the image so we can use the relevant parts? --AntonImaus 23:11, 30 January 2011 (PST)
Thanks
Thanks for the cleanup. I think this is a nice result.--SeventhBase 06:46, 1 February 2011 (PST)
I'm not sure if the tone of the lead section is NPOV
I can't help but feel that the lead section of this article takes a nasty feminist perspective. I understand that the response to Chris's letter assumes this angle, but Chris didn't write anything particularly unreasonable, and for a wiki that tries to be neutral and unbiased, this seems antagonistic. I'd appreciate any advice on improving it. -AReasonableMan (talk) 11:24, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
- Never mind, I did it myself. -AReasonableMan (talk) 14:58, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for removing unnecessary bashing for this article. Keep it up. Alan Pardew (talk) 07:06, 19 September 2014 (UTC)