Difference between revisions of "CWCki:Community Portal"
Line 69: | Line 69: | ||
Then the troll failed in completely capturing Chris's fail. The comic is actually well done and funny. But in all seriousness, i'm starting to thinkg that its alec after seeing th sonichu 11 page here.[[User:J0haely|J0haely]] 00:14, 25 April 2010 (UTC) | Then the troll failed in completely capturing Chris's fail. The comic is actually well done and funny. But in all seriousness, i'm starting to thinkg that its alec after seeing th sonichu 11 page here.[[User:J0haely|J0haely]] 00:14, 25 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
nah, the style is different, take for example the sonichu revolution pages, they are more blunt and the chris chan character ends up being the lazy jerk he usually is, while his characters are more kind and/or dumber than usual. This one has chris chan acting with reason, and focuses more onto the sonichus, and how they should really react on theyr miserable lives, on the other hand, this does go with someof the plans i've read around the CWCipedia.[[User:Basgon|Basgon]] 00:24, 25 April 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:24, 24 April 2010
The Community Portal is designed to be a public forum to discuss CWCki related affairs for site wide concerns, policy, that sort of thing.
Please consult the archives to make sure your concern hasn't already been posted before:
CWCki:Community Portal/Archive 1
CWCki:Community Portal/Archive 2
CWCki:Community Portal/Archive 3
CWCki:Community Portal/Archive 4
CWCki:Community Portal/Archive 5
CWCki:Community Portal/Archive 6
I want to warn other women
Hello, my name is Jackie. Jesus, I can't believe I'm doing this.
Long story short, I'm in the market for a boyfriend and I posted online, thinking I would give it a shot. I meet a guy named Christian Weston Chandler. Guess where this is going.
I didn't know anything about this guy before I met him there. I talked back and forth with him for a bit on email, got to know him a little. I didn't know he was such an internet freak. But he told me all about this cwcki site, because I wanted to know more about him and I wanted him to make a video for me. He initially refused to make a video for me because he said it "got him in trouble before". I didn't know what he meant, so he sent me here to see videos of him talking to previous girlfriends and how the nasty trolls got him in trouble for it. Mind you, he was very careful to remind me that this website is full of lies and shouldn't be trusted, despite the fact he himself sent me here.
But I respected the fact he was at least being honest with me about this online shit. Or so it seemed. I watched a bunch of his videos, got more and more disturbed by them. I questioned him on some things, like how he apparently cheated on one of his ex-girlfriends with some other girl online. As was quite insulting (but not at all surprising now that I've familiarized myself with this site), he lied to me and said it never happened. Even though he himself admitted to cheating on her in a video HE MADE.
And a bunch of other shit he lied about too. Like professing his love for me every five minutes, even though he COULDN'T REMEMBER MY FUCKING NAME. Check this video out: http://www.mediafire.com/?zzivjw32mlj I asked him to make me a video showing me his female-pleasuring skills (this was before I started to realize what a disgusting piece of shit he is), and he CALLS ME BY HIS EX-GIRLFRIEND'S NAME.
So there you go, have at it. He calls this website full of liars, but as far as I can tell he's a worthless piece of shit and this site is pretty frank about it. I'm fucking done dealing with him but I thought I'd contribute my experience as a warning to all the other women in Virginia.--JaxRomy 12:24am, 22 April 2010 (EST)
- Hello Jackie, and welcome. I am sorry you had to encounter Christian without any prior warning- the truth must be shocking and a little frightening (you know he twice tried to convince the trolls to trick him into raping someone who was trying to help him and only looking out for his best interests, right?). I'm sure I speak for everyone here when I say that you are most welcome here, and that your experience will be added to the massive (and growing) pile of documentation regarding this mental man and his life. Your goal of warning others is a noble one and I invite you to come, join in the documentation and study of Christian Weston Chandler. Again, you have my sympathies. -Ronichu 04:54, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
- Glad to be of service! Also, if you feel like you want to, you can add a better profile for him to Dontdatehimgirl.com--there's been one up there since 4chan/SA found his comic in 2007 and it's woefully out of date. And sorry you had to put up with being in a relationship with Chris. You are also welcome to contribute any information you want.--MoarLurk 04:58, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
- Chris chan, "cute"? Lol. Anyway, welcome. --James Lamp-Eye 05:08, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
- At least Chris had the lack of sense to point you here and warn you of what you were in for if you met him. Every new bit of Chris we see is darker and more disturbing than the last. This site does little more than hold a mirror up to Chris and let his own words speak for themselves. Enjoy exploring the man-child-sized bullet you just dodged. Any and all contributions you wish to make would be most appreciated. As you can see, we "trolls" are mainly fascinated observers of the perversion of nature known as Christian Chandler. --TubularMonkey 05:31, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
- Jackie, I am so sorry you had to go through this.--Beat 05:58, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
- Welcome and we're sorry for what you had to experience with Chris. You were lucky he pointed you here so soon. --Caboose -1 06:01, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
- Welcome Jackie and thank you for sharing your experience with us. I must congratulate you on your fortitude. The video he sent you make me feel quite nauseous and it's not even aimed at me! Yes, Christian Chandler is quite the sick puppy we describe and yet your e-mails are filled with juicy details and interesting anecdotes. You have proven your value and you are most welcome here among us. Griffintown 06:10, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
- Hey, there. I'm so sorry about what happened between you and Chris, but it was for the best, yes? Hope you have fun here. じゃね!--SniperFire16 13:21, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
YOU ARE FAGGOTS
every single last one of you. seriously. Clydec 01:52, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
- Indeed. Pfargtl9000 02:06, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
- Have my babiez, plz?--SniperFire16 03:24, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
- I want you inside me, Clyde. -Ronichu 02:30, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
- Oh Clyde, you're too nice. --BreadGod 03:25, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
- Cool.--Beat 03:40, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
- Yes. Griffintown 12:47, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
Icon Templates
So I've added some code to the icon templates (and even added the normal icon template code to about a third of the shirt icons) so we can toggle the text labels for the icons. I mainly forsee this being useful for the video boxes on articles, rather than having to type {{BlueRedSleeveRugby}} Blue & Red Sleeve Rugby, you can type {{BlueRedSleeveRugby|text=yes}} to generate the same effect. It also allows all uses of the icon template to be easily updated, should we decided to do something like rename a shirt.
I notice that there is a lot of inconsistency on pages with videos - some use icon templates, some don't - so do partly, probably due to new icon templates having later been made. So my plan is to revisit pages with videos and update them to use the templates. My dilemma is - should the format for showing the text be: {{Icontemplate|text=yes}} or {{Icontemplate|text}} or something else? --Anonymax 23:56, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
- Oh and examples of the icons with their respective text labels can be found here. --Anonymax 23:59, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
Sonichu update
I noticed today that some troll has "updated" Sonichu 11 with some new pages. Does anybody know who is this troll?J0haely 00:06, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
Protip: When stuff appears on CWCipedia, we put it there. Clyde in all likelyhood. --YawningSquirtleRedux 00:09, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
Then the troll failed in completely capturing Chris's fail. The comic is actually well done and funny. But in all seriousness, i'm starting to thinkg that its alec after seeing th sonichu 11 page here.J0haely 00:14, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
nah, the style is different, take for example the sonichu revolution pages, they are more blunt and the chris chan character ends up being the lazy jerk he usually is, while his characters are more kind and/or dumber than usual. This one has chris chan acting with reason, and focuses more onto the sonichus, and how they should really react on theyr miserable lives, on the other hand, this does go with someof the plans i've read around the CWCipedia.Basgon 00:24, 25 April 2010 (UTC)