User talk:Anonymax

You've been busy already - good job. Keep it up. --Blunderscore 13:36, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

• Thanks for fixing the typos in Mumble 3! Sometimes my memory fails me. --Ronichu 15:04, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Re:User Template Categories

That sounds like a good idea. Should we start moving pages, then? Lime 03:18, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

• Hmm, now that you mention it, I tried moving the weeaboo category to change its capitalization but I didn't see the "move" tab.

An awards/standard userboxes split sounds good. It'll keep the Awards category from being cluttered. --Lime 03:36, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

• Got it. I'd delete them right now, but since I'm only supposed to delete vandalism I don't want to accidentally abuse my Jerkop powers. Maybe you should ask one of the higher ups to do it? Lime 05:11, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

Re: New Shirt Icons

Okay. I've been using MS Paint all this time, but I just downloaded GIMP (it seems to be a lot more user-friendly than I remembered). How many have you fixed so far? I can fix the rest if there are any left to be done. -- Revolver Octopus 01:57, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

• No, I've got it. Thanks for offering, though. -- Revolver Octopus 02:04, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
  • I hope you do ZThe Joker shirt justice seeing as it actually is one of his best known shirts for raging now.--Hieghts503 21:55, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

About the welcome template...

I saw your post on YawningSquirtleRedux's talk page and I understand your reasoning, but wouldn't it be more convenient to to just use the template rather than all the text itself? I mean, thats what the template is for isn't it? It saves file size and and can actually be just typed out, rather than having to copy paste it in from somewhere. Plus it makes the talk pages easier to navigate around without all that text there. I don't know about you, but to me, using the template seems it'd be the easier option. And i'm still not sure what'd be so bad about the user talk pages changing when the template is edited. Wouldn't that just mean they'd have the up to date version of the welcome? Besides, how often would we even need to change the template. It looks fine to me as it is. --Edward 21:52, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Hey, buddy

You forgot a userbox. Pfargtl9000 Spam and Eggs 19:26, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

Ham

I'm amazed - nay, ASTOUNDED - that we have a template for that. --manwithoutabody, 21:40, 03 June 2010

My Page

Thanks for cleaning up the userboxes. I kind of got the feeling I had done it wrong, but was too tired to mess around with it any more.--Star Platinum 04:57, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Uh, question.

I recently saw in my talk page's history something about you not wanting me to reinvent the wheel? May I ask what that was about?
DonnieDarko 05:10, 4 June 2010 (UTC)DonnieDarko

whitespace issues

Thank you so much for fixing the whitespace issues for the troll userboxes. I was wondering what was causing them. --Lime 19:44, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Re: Your Jerkop application

In case you get this before you see my message in IRC, get in touch with me, I'd like to talk to you. --Champthom 14:10, 11 September 2010 (PDT)

re:Large Rollback

Ah, thank you! I'll be sure to remember that. --Lime 13:26, 12 September 2010 (PDT)

Talk pages

The point of talk pages is to... TALK. It doesn't have to have a standard or anything. Right...? --Tommy-Vercetti 06:51, 14 September 2010 (PDT)

I have a few words for you:

You especially, need to get off your high horse.

Funny how everyone on this wiki criticizes Chris for being full of himself, how ironic since it's common from the editors here too. I'm through editing this shit wikipedia. You editors are just as pathetic as Chris. Fuck you. --Tommy-Vercetti 20:44, 17 September 2010 (PDT)

Thanks for trying

Unfortunately none of those suit my needs, thanks for trying though. --Ashki

Hey, idiot

Thanks for destroying my work: http://www.cogsdev.org/w/index.php?title=Vivian_Gee_E-mails_2&action=historysubmit&diff=115313&oldid=115312 --Sonijew is back 15:40, 23 September 2010 (PDT)

Work 1 section a time

Just like as I do. --Sonijew is back 15:46, 23 September 2010 (PDT)

It's for future

Use the sections, there won't be conflicts of edits with someone else (probably). --Sonijew is back 15:51, 23 September 2010 (PDT)

WTF

I didnt "re-add crap" I removed the names of the 2 tards on the call. Check the version difference. Dkd 09:15, 24 September 2010 (PDT)

Video icons with blank linkage, etc

Hiya. I edited a few of the "subject" and "style" video icons that weren't pointing to links (i.e. they just went to file:image.blah and also were missing alt text), and changed one in particular ("Reason" under "style" pointed to the page for "Fail"; I changed it to "Chris and hypocrisy" since I figured there were plenty of examples and links for CWC's failures). Is there currently or will there be a desire to edit the icons in "shirt" and "other" similarly? If so, I'm willing to help, though not sure how people would want that done. There are only a few linked shirts so far, typically ones that are iconic of certain traits or events (e.g. the Pokemon shirt, the muscle bra). Others could be linked along the same way, like the "Rollin and Trollin" video for the "Trollin Style" outfit, or if something is ubiquitous enough it can just point to Chris's fashion page. The icons in the "other" category could link in the same way but I don't know if video types are categorized any further than the List of Videos, nevermind that I'm not sure what qualifies as "live" or "directfeed".

Anyhow, I've always thought the video icons on the CWCiki are a neat touch. The shirts are all great. I'd only really change the "Rumors" icon because I always thought it was an old-fashioned weighing scale instead of a warning sign. Let me know if I can help. Talktalktalk 18:29, 30 September 2010 (PDT)

Sorry

I was just trying to clear out some of the improper information and Clyde was jumping down my throat for no good reason, so yeah. --Ashki 20:47, 1 October 2010 (PDT)

• Honestly though, I can tell where I'm not wanted, so I might as well take my leave. --Ashki 20:48, 1 October 2010 (PDT)

Hmm. Arguing against Clyde is a bit like tying your shoelaces up before entering a Mosque - a waste of time. --Anonymax 20:52, 1 October 2010 (PDT)

Still, you might want to reign some control over him, there was absolutely no reason for him to jump down my throat for making a simple mistake, it's as simple as that. --Ashki 00:10, 2 October 2010 (PDT)

I don't think it was your simple mistake that did it, my friend. Although maybe you caught me a bad time. (ur still dumb lol) Clydec 00:43, 2 October 2010 (PDT)

New article

I just made an article titled Chris and Cosplay, can you look it over and tell me if I did anything bad?--Lylelash 11:31, 11 October 2010 (PDT)

Re: Duck censorship

We did in for the Chris and Sex article. It's the article for the damn protagonist of the comics, an obviously important page, people shouldn't have to look at Chris's penis unless they know what they're getting into. --DStecks 16:05, 20 October 2010 (PDT)

Re: Whatever

The issue with that is that we can say he fails at all sorts of things like "Making a crowd noise" and validly put them into the article. I honestly think your example is a good one in that it is something he can't do, but the problem is that it's not something he regularly fails at. About a month ago, I went through the article and trimmed out stuff like that, purely because the article needed trimming and nobody else was doing it. If we start putting in examples of all of his individual failures, we'll have to put all of them back in, and the article will go back to the way it was before unless we limit it in some other way.

I think there comes a point at which we should put less emphasis on including every detail and more emphasis on making it humanly possible to read the article, and the Fail article has always been on the brink of this point. If you think that the article should be taken in a different direction, I honestly don't have an issue with that, but you'll have your work cut out for you.

Oh and also, there's already "Exercise" listed, but that's not as significant. Freecell 11:09, 6 November 2010 (PDT)