Difference between revisions of "Talk:6 June 2010"

From CWCki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 164: Line 164:


::::::Either ways, massive tard-ragings will follow the sentencing, and Chris will learn (for once) that the legal system does not exist for his sole purpose, but to keep people safe form him. --[[User:SargentPickles|SargentPickles]] 21:39, 13 June 2010 (EST)
::::::Either ways, massive tard-ragings will follow the sentencing, and Chris will learn (for once) that the legal system does not exist for his sole purpose, but to keep people safe form him. --[[User:SargentPickles|SargentPickles]] 21:39, 13 June 2010 (EST)
::::::I seriously doubt Chris will learn anything from this purely hypothetical situation. Also, I doubt that he'll ever get into serious trouble, unless he runs someone over (which doesn't seem that likely, unless this drunk driving habit continues). Everything else that he has done is more or less a "misdemeanor" (or something like that, I'm not familiar with Americunt law), harmless stupid shit like yelling "NOOOOOOOO" in a crowded mall and not really threatening to anyone.
However, I would literally give my right hand to see him represent himself in court, that would be epic beyond human understanding :) [[User:Banzai881|Banzai881]] 04:08, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:08, 14 June 2010

Fool that I am, I think I might actually transcribe this... Dkaien 03:31, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

  • I will take the second half of DIS BITCH. This is an urge I cannot control. Also what the fuck Chris is fucking stalking Snyder now goddammit.--Beat 03:58, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
  • Sorry, I finished it up before I saw your update. I sincerely apologize if you listened to any of this shit unecessarily. Dkaien 04:06, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
  • You did a good job! I did do some transcribing before I realized you had finished it, but honestly I needed the practice anyway.--Beat 06:03, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

To do

Add Michael Synder's comment from YouTube that sparked this (see Da update for it). --Champthom 03:32, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Rename dis bitch

If a video does not have a proper name, you name it after the date it went up. This should be "6 June 2010". What is so goddamn hard about this?--Beat 04:00, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

  • Whathisname usually figures out how to treat shit, that's why I named it that. That's why. --Champthom 04:02, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
  • Now that I know Champ made the page, I feel bad about my first comment.--Beat 06:03, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
  • You are forgiven, my son. Happens to the best of us.--Champthom 17:21, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

I'LL RUN YOU OVER DEAD

This is the second time that we know of that Chris has tried to commit vehicular homicide. I get the feeling that at this rate, he's going to get himself v@ V& by the end of the year. -- Revolver Octopus 07:40, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

  • Chris is going to be vat'd, huh? -Brofose 10:00, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
  • Probably. They need to do something to get the stank out of him. -- Revolver Octopus 10:44, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
  • Still - this is only one version of the events. For all we know he could be exaggerating the entire situation - but I like to think we get the TRUE and HONEST version of events sometimes. --Anonymax 12:23, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Add to relevant article?

"Right, if I had the right mind, I would send, I would give him a charge of verbal, serve him a charge of verbal harassment!" This right after he tried to take a picture of some guy to use as a dartboard, drove (presumably) drunk, took pictures without the person's consent, nearly ran two people over, and then thought he could bitch about it on the internet. Is this Chris and Law or Chris and Reality? Thelieisacake 14:56, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

The key theme here is that it's innocent behavior when Chris does it. I suggest Chris and Hypocrisy or Examples of Chris's Ego. CWCspatcher 15:01, 7 June 2010 (UTC) Although this definitely merits mention on Chris and the Law as well, as prime evidence of his mentality that the law is not meant for punishing him in any circumstance. CWCspatcher 15:04, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Stalking

According to Wikipedia, which is always right, "[s]talking can be defined as the willful and repeated following, watching, and / or harassing of another person." Chris has been banned from the The GAMe PLACe. He's gone back repeatedly, each time being told to leave and never come back. He admitted to planning to go willfully back this time in order to watch and photograph Michael Snyder. It's not necessarily a crime, but it does seem to constitute stalking by a reasonable definition. I just think it should be noted that it's not just troll puffery to call it that. —Thepicklesuitintheman 16:54, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

  • Considering Chris's history of holding grudges against people he considers "enemies", him stalking people "offending" him is not out of the question. --DrunkenDemomang 04:06, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Snyder's input

Any chance we can get a hold of Mike and get his side of the story? He might appreciate it too if we got that and put it up here so everyone and his grandmother doesn't call and ask him. --Caboose -1 17:07, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

I sent him a message on Youtube, if I get a response (unlikely) I'll screencap it and add it to the article. If anyone knows a more direct way to contact him, it would be great to get the whole story from him.--Star Platinum 19:40, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
Perhaps Mimms or Lucas would know a way of getting ahold of him. Of course, you'd need to get ahold of Mimms or Lucas first, but that would seem to be an easier feat considering their past cooperation with certain websites. --shearod 22:36, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
I'm in the process of asking Mimms if he knows anything about this. I'll post what I find. Meat Miracle 23:13, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
  • Mimms doesn't know, but he said he can ask Michael. Meat Miracle 02:12, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

At the bar with a Bud and a DS

I was re-reading the transcript of the video when these little things starting nagging me; who goes in a bar with a DS and why it sounds oh-so-familliar coming from Chris? Then, I had an insight; is there a possibility that Chris found in bars a new prowling ground for his "Love-Quest"? He had the same attitude at the local McCrap and Target but without the alcohol.Griffintown 17:11, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

  • Maybe he's taking his parent's approach of meeting da ladies. After all, Barb and Bob met at a bar. -DrunkenDemomang 16:25, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
Maybe he'll finally meet his sweetheart at the same age as Bob, when both parties out out of their prime and desperate enough. Of course, it would take a really desperate girl to get with Chris. Bill Lumburg 20:29, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
Don't be silly. Chris won't live anywhere near as long as Bob has so far. I predict he'll die of a heart attack in his mid fifties. Maybe forties. --Edward 21:41, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
I'm also guessing 40. He eats fast food every day and he does nothing but sit on his ass. --BreadGod 23:17, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
That's not true. Sometimes he stands up to play Guitar Hero and threaten the internet. -Schismtracer 15:29, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Made up at the spot?

Does anyone else think Chris's story sounds like it was made up at the spot at some parts? --Shotaru 23:27, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Chris is a pathological liar, so I wouldn't put it past him. --BreadGod 23:34, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
I doubt it. We have that post from June 4th by someone claiming to be Snyder saying Chris was taking pictures of him. Although I doubt Chris's testimony about what happaned especially after Micheal came out of the Game Place its right there his voice gets higher to the point where I can tell he is lying.
Lucas and Mimms said that TheRcholic is indeed Mike way back when 100 2178 was uploaded. Pfargtl9000 Spam and Eggs 02:05, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
I think most of what he's saying here is true, or at least the general concept. That said, if I had a daughter, and I saw someone like Chris hanging around with a camera, you had better believe I would assume the worst.--Beat 02:27, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
Chris is a bad liar. There's way too much details. He was drinking ONE beer at a local bar with his DS and a camera for ONE hour. Then, he decided ON THE SPOT to go take a picture of Michael for an inexistent dartboard? My bullshit detector was on the red right passed time 1:34. Griffintown 03:03, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
I believe him. Nothing in the story is out of the ordinary for him. Drinking, playing DS in public, dumb impulsive ideas, using pictures as dartboards, vehicular assault; he's done all of these at least once. His story fits in perfectly with the other one and actually makes more sense than him taking photos of a little girl. And his story doesn't exactly make him seem any less in the wrong, though being a dumbass he probably thinks it does. Mexican 18:24, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
I think he's telling a half-truth. He was there taking pictures of Michael Snyder for use as a dartboard, he was caught off guard by Mike jumping in front of him that second time(the first time he was yelling at him to get out of the car), and he had only had one drink(possibly). However, he wasn't just taking pictures of Mike--he was also trying to get pictures of anyone that may have been on Mike's "side" of Chris's imaginary feud with him. Chris photographed everyone Mike was talking to on the assumption that he would only speak with his supporters and in the process photographed his daughter. He got caught during this and when the police made Chris delete the photos(keyword, "photos", not "photo"), Mike saw a picture of his daughter. Chris sperged out and started complaining about trolls and the officers gave him a warning because honestly, the guy is very clearly retarded.--MoarLurk 18:52, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
That's possible. And actually I said little girl, but do we even know how old Michael's daughter is? Do we even know how old Michael is? As for Michael jumping in front of his car, that also sounds not right, but I don't think Chris lied, I think his little autistic brain thinks that's what actually happened. Mexican 16:02, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
From context, she's young enough that it should be obvious but old enough that Chris didn't pick up on it.--MoarLurk 16:31, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

Robotnik

I haven't played any Sonic games since Sonic & Knuckles, but, by Chris's own admission, pretty much what happened is that he was sneaking around doing something he shouldn't, jumped into a machine to try to beat the good guy, and ultimately failed. Not to mention that his torso is really fat and round and his limbs are really skinny. It just seems to me that Chris is getting more and more like Dr. Robotnik as time goes on. —Thepicklesuitintheman 07:34, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

  • So he'll say "I'MMMMMMM STRAIIIIIIGHT YOU TROLLLLLSSSS!" every time we win? Awesome.--MoarLurk 08:57, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
Yeah, kinda like that. And eventually he'll get fed up of going after Sonic the trolls by himself and build two humorously incompetent robot henchmen. Except by "building," I mean "inflating," and the robots are actually his blow-up dolls Kimmi and Officer Nasty.
Hey, Clyde's hair is even spiky. Just dye it blue and you have an instant hero. Maybe Liquid can be Tails or something, I dunno. It would be just like AoStH, except "Robotnik" has no wacky schemes, isn't really actively pursuing destroying the hero, and has a fucking terrible singing voice. Lord Snotfolus 09:37, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
As opposed to the real Robotnik, who sings like an Angel. --Edward 15:33, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
A lot like Long John Baldry, actually. Lord Snotfolus 01:15, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
Make it so, number two. Bill Lumburg 16:38, 8 June 2010 (UTC)


Ta-da.
Dr Chris Chan.png
Sonic Clyde Cash.jpg

--Yoyoddd 10:19, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Put these images in the fanart section immediatly! --Edward 17:15, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

I wish Chris was still taking fanmail. Maybe an innocent seven-year-old fan would mail it claiming Chris reminded him of Robotnik or something. I'm sure that would put him in a minor fit. Bill Lumburg 21:11, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

  • Oh, hey, I just realized that Chris was SNOO-PING AS USUAL I SEE.--MoarLurk 18:52, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

Police Report

There must be one. I don't know any free service to get the record, but if anyone does, toss it up. Alternatively, if someone is willing to use a pay service to get at it, it might make somebody here love you. Not me though. --Homeless prophet 17:46, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

  • Keep an eye on this page. It has Chris's other crimes, so it may be updated later. HermanoBluth 19:58, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
Thanks Bluth, I'll be watching that. But there should be a document written by a police officer that details the entire incident from the perspective of that officer. I think that might do a lot to give a clear image of what happened, since all we've got is a few words from Michael (who didn't give much detail, and may not be totally correct) and a video from Chris (who is pretty okay with lying, and regardless is a poor communicator). The records are sorted by place and time, not name, but should be pretty trackable. The only issue is that I think you need access to a paid database to collect the record if you're outside the jurisdiction. I'm not 100% sure though, since I've never gone looking for one. If somebody knows how to find the record, that would probably make the entire situation much clearer. --Homeless prophet 17:03, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
  • Once the case is closed the information is open to public perusal...provided there is a case, or if a write-up counts. --Hellion 12:25 11 June, 2010

Am I the only one that noticed this?

I noticed the absence of not only the medallion but also the amnyfest ring. Usually this means that this isnt TRUE and HONEST content, right? Or is there some other mitigating circumstance? I am not going to edit the article to highlight this as I doubt that no one hasnt noticed these things missing. I am just interested on you guys' take on this. Thoughts? Wozblod 20:59, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

  • Neither have the past two videos before this. Either that means the past two videos (effectively both internet rage quits, and we can see how honest those were) were all lies, or it's part of his newer, more-"mature" (if you can call it that) image, what with the less retarded clothing. I think the latter is more likely, although the former would make sense. I just doubt Chris actually plans things like that. And given his frequent tendency of lying, he'd probably label blatant lies as True and Honest anyway. --KingoftheJuice 04:10, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
  • I think someone in the YASG briefed him on the cock-blocking power of the medallion. So, in the effort of cosplay Marco Polo, he removed the piece of clay and replaced it by his own brand of "Trailer Chic". Griffintown 03:10, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

A Warning...Really?

Did the cops seriously let Chris off with a warning? Were they not informed beforehand about his previous troubles with Chris? I was absolutely furious to hear that Chris was let off the hook again. --SpaceScreaminJohn 00:49, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

He's got three priors so the police know him. And they what we know; he's too weak to cause people real harm. Still, he's dangerous behind the wheel. Bill Lumburg 00:56, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

  • Those three priors were five years ago. Plus, anyone who sees Chris can tell that he has some sort of mental problem--Wes always thought he had Downs, for example. If Bob and Barb are any indication, Charlottesville is surrounded by lawsuit happy rednecks and the cop wouldn't have a chance in court--and even then such a scandal would ruin their career, they'd always be "that monster who busted a poor retarded guy". Really, the warning was the best thing they could do. If Chris winds up doing something stupid again this year, they'll probably come down on him a bit harder.--MoarLurk 01:18, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
    • I agree, the cops probably let him off easy because they did sense that he's retarded. However, it won't be much help to him if he does it again. At this point, Chris's repeated harassment of Michael could very well be argued to be criminal and definitely threatening. If Chris pulls this shit again, there's going to be 2 possible outcomes:

1. If the cops do nothing or let him off with a warning again, Michael has more than enough proof to file a civil suit against Chris for mental suffering, and Chris's autism wont get him off the hook this time. Regardless of Chris's mental state, he did cause suffering to Michael and someone will have to pay for not protecting him from Chris. Either Chris's parents (or possibly the police department if it can be proved they acted negligently in protecting Michael form Chris) would end up having to pay for Snyder's suffering, and most likely it would be the lumberjack and snorlax as their technically his legal guardians. When they have to sell the house to pay off the legal bills and judgment against them, maybe then they will reflect on their utter failure as parents.

2. Chris get's arrested, booked and processed. Now, since he is legally retarded, he wouldn't get sent to jail, but he is still a danger to the community, so he'd end up institutionalized. This would be perfect, as he'd be forced to live with a bunch of other "slow in the minds" and I'm 90% certain that they don't allow video games, especially not to retards that have addictions to them. He could then only be released if it's proven that he's capable of functioning in the real world, and we all know that that isn't gonna happen.

Needless to say, Chris has pushed his luck for the last time. If he does do something criminal again, he'll be in deep shit --SargentPickles 12:46, 11 June 2010 (EST)

  • Here here! Lets all hope that he gets his comeuppance next time then. --Edward 17:35, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
      • There's no way chris, nor his parents, will ever learn from their mistakes. These people never change. They'll always seem themselves as a victim. They'll always have something to fall back on. "WELL IF THAT MAN AT WAL-MART NEVER SOLD ME THE GUN I WOULDN'T HAVE SHOT ANYONE, HE SHOULD BE ARRESTED TOO!" Brofose 16:58, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

He mentioned two trolls to the officers

Which two get the honor, I Say Clyde and tito

Does he realize how crazy he must sound if the police have no idea what a "troll" is? You take away the internet meaning, and he sounds like some paranoid retard who thinks some imaginary creatures are out to get him via the web.--PhilRaptor 08:17, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Has Chris crossed the line?

If he's really tried to kill Michael, is it possible this has stopped being funny and started being scary? -Sarge 13:33 10 June 2010.

  • God damn, guys, stop being so melodramatic. This shit isn't scary, and no matter what he does, he will never achieve an action which is scary. You guys need to get off the internet more. Thelieisacake 12:37, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
  • He tried to hit someone with a car.
  • Sign your posts guys. It's just 4 ~ in a row, not that hard. --Caboose -1 15:17, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
  • Chris is a first-class pussy. I think he tried to do so but became skittish at the last second. I still think he might hit someone on a 'Tard-Rage moment but this wasn't the case. As far as I can say, Chris's stalking habits raised many red flags even before I have heard that he owns a car. Griffintown 16:13, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

"Chris cross" lol.

but seriously, if the police won't do anything, this is probably what will land him in jail for good, considering he can't do anything else. Let's just hope he's still reluctant to actually kill anyone IRL. Bill Lumburg 15:44, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

"Fiddle" the cats

Just for the articles sake can we find where the rumor started that seems to be getting Manchild a bit annoyed? Shawths

  • Chris invented it on June 4 after a woman, possibly either Michael Snyder's wife or daughter, called him a "kiddie fiddler" and he misheard it.--MoarLurk 15:32, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
    • Do we have delicious sauce on this? Baxter 14:22, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
      • This is all guesswork, but it fits with Michael's comments and Chris's inability to understand what other people are saying. Also, "kitty" sounds like "kiddie" and Chris is Chris.--MoarLurk 18:42, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

Well folks....... this is it.

The countdown to Oblivion has begun. It is only a matter of time before Chris is either is killed by his own stupidity or is institutionalized. I bet this will happen before the year is out. I cannot see someone as self destructive as Chris getting through another year. GOTDANG 8:40 12 June

Don't count on it. There's powerful forces out there hell-bent into keeping Chris in his "Free Range" lifestyle. First, the State of Virginia is paying pennies to keep him away from having to feed and lodge him. You can expect them to be lenient. Chris's parents are also happy with the gravy train coming from the State. They will fight in court any attempt to institutionalize him. I am also expecting Rocky to still be in a masochistic mood; she will not give up on the manchild until he does something REALLY dumb. So, even with the booze, his car and his "lifestyle", I don't expect seeing his demise before 2030. Griffintown 14:10, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
  • 2030? I wouldn't go that far. Even if the retard is protected from others at all angles, don't forget he can still hurt himself. I predict that through a combination of his bad eating habits, laziness, and high stress levels, he'll die of a heart atack or stroke soon enough. I give it 7-9 years. --Edward 16:20, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
Factoring in his daily intake of fried foods and virtually little to any exercise, I would be more shocked if Chris didn't have a heart attack before he hits 35. His biggest threat is himself. --SargentPickles 13:32, 12 June 2010 (EST)

What will happen if he goes to court?

I predict absolute hilarity from Christain Weston Chandler. Don't be surprise if he throws a tard rage in it. We all know what the result will be. Super Smash Bros. Fan

raep?J0haely 19:26, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
Probably some times in jail at best. Super Smash Bros. Fan
He won't be going to prison and court is highly unlikely unless he does something stupid like this again within the year.--MoarLurk 23:55, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
What does he need to do to get (not self induced) home arrest? J0haely 00:32, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
If he ever winds up in court, it'll probably happen. His parents are very good at pleading for reduced sentences and to be fair Chris probably does deserve them due to his borderline mental retardation. Plus, if he gets a full sentence on trespassing his options are as follows--pay two full tugboats in fines, go to an institution(because he's too unstable for regular jail), or go under house arrest. Boblax is terrified of option B and won't pay for option A unless their only other choice is option B. Since they may have option C, they'll go with that, which is a win-win for everyone.--MoarLurk 00:59, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
If Chris does do something stupid again, the main result will be institutionalization plus lulz. No doubt the lumberjack and snorlax will pitch a fit about how he's "special" and that he shouldn't be held accountable, but when the judge asks them what they have done to keep Chris form threatening others and keeping him safe form himself, they will have no excuse. I have no doubt that if Chris takes the stand, the jury and judge will be utterly puzzled by his allegations of mysterious people trying to keep him from getting laid and a man in a pickle suit stalking him. Eventually, one of two conclusions will be reached:
A. Chris is completely insane, and must be institutionalized for his, and others, safety.
B. The lumberjack and snorlax are unfit as his legal guardians, and will be sent to a state run home for the mentally challenged.
Either ways, massive tard-ragings will follow the sentencing, and Chris will learn (for once) that the legal system does not exist for his sole purpose, but to keep people safe form him. --SargentPickles 21:39, 13 June 2010 (EST)
I seriously doubt Chris will learn anything from this purely hypothetical situation. Also, I doubt that he'll ever get into serious trouble, unless he runs someone over (which doesn't seem that likely, unless this drunk driving habit continues). Everything else that he has done is more or less a "misdemeanor" (or something like that, I'm not familiar with Americunt law), harmless stupid shit like yelling "NOOOOOOOO" in a crowded mall and not really threatening to anyone.

However, I would literally give my right hand to see him represent himself in court, that would be epic beyond human understanding :) Banzai881 04:08, 14 June 2010 (UTC)