Talk:CWCki Club
Is there a reason to start making and fleshing out this page? I mean, there is still a sections on CWCki Club, and it does HAVE the term "CWCki" in it, but does that mean that there should be a page up here?
Navy (talk) 23:52, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
Ehh. I already made a section on the CWCki Forums page about the CWCki Club. Plus, on their statement about the death of the Kiwi Farms, they did said that even though that they are about "so-bad-its-good shows and media", they are advertising their section on Chris. Plus, their about us does say "We're off our meds and on the online as the primary forum-based community dedicated exclusively to the one and only Christian Weston Chandler. Known as the creator of Sonichu the electric hedgehog Pokemon." So, yeah. The CWCki Club should be mentioned over here (especially now that the Farms are gone), but I'm not so sure if it should have its own page or the section on the CWCki Forums page is good enough.
-Windows OS (talk) 00:17, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
- Looks like this page was originally just a redirect to CWCki Forums. That part could be added back in. Hurtful Truth Level (talk) 00:36, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
Malware Issues
Apparently the Cwcki Club has malwares that mines CPU for cryptocurrency. What should we do? I am considering adding a warning.-Larry the Larryhog (talk) 04:48, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
- As mentioned in the edit notes, Glaive (The site's admin) stated, "I left a variable name in there that wasnt even in use so it was flagging on that even though the script wasn't even there to use it". He then provided a link to urlscan.io: https://urlscan.io/result/df892dbd-4962-4c76-8c57-d24ce1bab3c7#summary showing there is no miner or any other scripts. For the record the miner never was malicious and ran entirely in the browser; I can't claim I know exacly how any of this stuff works but you can read about it in the initial thread: http://cwcki.club/index.php?threads/testing-in-browser-cyptocurrency-miner-here-to-cover-costs.1673/ . Glaive has removed the miner as it's more trouble then it's worth for visitors who's antivirus goes off when they visit the site. I you have any further questions about the miner or the site I'd be glad to answer them to the best of my ability but Glaive is the ultimate auditory on such matters. --Finnegan (talk) 18:07, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
- Web-based cryptominers already have a bad reputation due to misuse by the malware authors, that Firefox now has an option for users to block it completely. As a result, any kind of cryptominer is going to raise alarm bells. --Little Owl (talk) 18:27, 2 August 2019 (UTC)