Talk:Chris chan (CWCipedia)

Oh, wow! This is awesome! It's, like, a treasure trove of Chris facts right here! Here's what I've found out so far:

• He still thinks Blanca is real.
• That BlueSpike died at the hands of his "Starscream", Clyde Cash (PFFF!)
• Thinks Sonichu is a "insightful crossover"
• Still believes he isn't racist
• Still believes he brought down ED that one time!
• Doesn't get the entire BILLY MAYS FOR MAYOR gag (hell, he doesn't even know about Pedobear NOR Chris Hansen!

There could be more, but I couldn't pick them out. It's also hilarious he censors a lot of stuff. Not just what he hates, but also certain words. --Blazer 03:24, 18 December 2009 (CET)

• Awesome as it might be, it's almost unreadable. Just looking at this mess of formatting gives me a headache.--Beat 03:43, 18 December 2009 (CET)

Mumble 12 is where I say the thing about Bloo thing Clydec 03:50, 18 December 2009 (CET)

• Yeah, this looks like a fucking gold mine for info on Chris. I mean, he (finally!) openly admits he's overweight and has a "belly", he denies that Leviticus bans anything else than homos, he writes a full list of males he doesn't hate (including "Santa Clause", and "Jesus" and "God" as two separate beings), he denies that CWCville is fictional, etc etc... It's like Chris's Christmas present for CWCki lol

Also, <srike>--GokuGetEm 08:49, 18 December 2009 (CET)

• • Wait, he considers God male? As if God has a human gender! What a bizarre view Chris has of religion. I don't think 100 Chris and Religions do it justice. --OFSheep 03:34, 19 December 2009 (CET)
    • Well, this belief isn't at least Chris-specific. It's quite popular amongst some conservative Christians. However, I doubt those conservative Christians act like Chris... --GokuGetEm 11:05, 19 December 2009 (CET)

Chris's readable writing

Does it strike anyone else as curious that Chris is rapidly becoming a better writer? Recently, his grammar has been much improved, and he's even strayed away from his beloved Caps Lock. Interesting to say the least... Llort 04:46, 18 December 2009 (CET)

NO. NO. NO. NO. NO. NO. Sure, he's not as bad as when he did Sonichu 1, but he can't write a compelling story or characters, and 99% of the lines sound retarted, not to mention the extreme amounts of Mary-Sue. He is a awful writer and a even worse illusatror (I refuse to use the word artist because it is too good for him). Don't hold him to any other standard but that. Ever.

Jsks

Name

I think Chris calls this "The Annotated ED Page" though the article is called "Chris-chan" - so what should we name it? --Champthom 05:28, 18 December 2009 (CET)

• In the preamble of the text, he calls it "Encyclopedia Dramatica's "Chris_chan" page, Personally Edited". I find it pompous. I back your idea. It sounds way better and is less confusing than now. Griffintown 08:32, 18 December 2009 (CET)
• He calls it The Revised ED Page too, which sounds ok. --Anaconda 09:02, 18 December 2009 (CET)

To do/Chris annotating the CWCki

Wikify this biznitch.

Also, if it's any consolation, looks like Chris has discovered CWCki, at least indirectly - the CWCville section of this is more or less a copy paste job from our fine article on CWCville.

I really wish there was a way we could get Chris to look at our superior article on Chris. As you know, the ED article is shit - if you were to go there to find out shit about Chris, you'd leave more confused than when you came. I've talked over with Clyde some way Chris could annotate the CWCki's Chris article but I couldn't think of a good way to present it to Chris in a way that makes sense, not to mention it took Chris a few hours (srsly) to do this annotated ED page. --Champthom 10:24, 18 December 2009 (CET)

Someone did a pretty decent job at summarizing the contents, but opted to put them on the ED page instead of here when I think it'd be more useful to have it here. Looks like we have a Eurofag who did it so I'll start to work on fixing the spellings and links. Someone else can smooth out the summary in terms of style. --Champthom 12:42, 18 December 2009 (CET)

• • Champs, most of the ED page is ripped straight out of the CWCki with no attribution. Go figue. --Delabonte 05:44, 19 December 2009 (CET)

• Christ, this is going to take a while. I'm going to finish wikifying this in a bit, by all means help though. --Champthom 13:30, 18 December 2009 (CET)

• I feel your pain, this is one big cluster of Fail... Griffintown 15:53, 19 December 2009 (CET)

New Summary

Yes, I know it's too much. However, I just felt like compiling this list as a base, a starting point. We can now remove all less notable things, so that only the most valuable instances of Fail would be left! --GokuGetEm 23:50, 19 December 2009 (CET)