Talk:Chris chan (CWCipedia)

Oh, wow! This is awesome! It's, like, a treasure trove of Chris facts right here! Here's what I've found out so far:

• He still thinks Blanca is real.
• That BlueSpike died at the hands of his "Starscream", Clyde Cash (PFFF!)
• Thinks Sonichu is a "insightful crossover"
• Still believes he isn't racist
• Still believes he brought down ED that one time!
• Doesn't get the entire BILLY MAYS FOR MAYOR gag (hell, he doesn't even know about Pedobear NOR Chris Hansen!

There could be more, but I couldn't pick them out. It's also hilarious he censors a lot of stuff. Not just what he hates, but also certain words. --Blazer 03:24, 18 December 2009 (CET)

• Awesome as it might be, it's almost unreadable. Just looking at this mess of formatting gives me a headache.--Beat 03:43, 18 December 2009 (CET)

Mumble 12 is where I say the thing about Bloo thing Clydec 03:50, 18 December 2009 (CET)

• Yeah, this looks like a fucking gold mine for info on Chris. I mean, he (finally!) openly admits he's overweight and has a "belly", he denies that Leviticus bans anything else than homos, he writes a full list of males he doesn't hate (including "Santa Clause", and "Jesus" and "God" as two separate beings), he denies that CWCville is fictional, etc etc... It's like Chris's Christmas present for CWCki lol

Also, <srike>--GokuGetEm 08:49, 18 December 2009 (CET)

• • Wait, he considers God male? As if God has a human gender! What a bizarre view Chris has of religion. I don't think 100 Chris and Religions do it justice. --OFSheep 03:34, 19 December 2009 (CET)
    • Well, this belief isn't at least Chris-specific. It's quite popular amongst some conservative Christians. However, I doubt those conservative Christians act like Chris... --GokuGetEm 11:05, 19 December 2009 (CET)
      • Typically god is depicted as male just because that's how they liked to paint him in the old days. I've been to a lot of churches (conservative and not) and pretty much all of them state that God doesn't have a gender. Of course, Chris doesn't get this. He probably saw a picture of the Sistine chapel at some point, and therefore thinks of God exclusively in terms of an old white guy.--Beat 20:57, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Chris's readable writing

Does it strike anyone else as curious that Chris is rapidly becoming a better writer? Recently, his grammar has been much improved, and he's even strayed away from his beloved Caps Lock. Interesting to say the least... Llort 04:46, 18 December 2009 (CET)

NO. NO. NO. NO. NO. NO. Sure, he's not as bad as when he did Sonichu 1, but he can't write a compelling story or characters, and 99% of the lines sound retarted, not to mention the extreme amounts of Mary-Sue. He is a awful writer and a even worse illusatror (I refuse to use the word artist because it is too good for him). Don't hold him to any other standard but that. Ever.

Jsks

Name

I think Chris calls this "The Annotated ED Page" though the article is called "Chris-chan" - so what should we name it? --Champthom 05:28, 18 December 2009 (CET)

• In the preamble of the text, he calls it "Encyclopedia Dramatica's "Chris_chan" page, Personally Edited". I find it pompous. I back your idea. It sounds way better and is less confusing than now. Griffintown 08:32, 18 December 2009 (CET)
• He calls it The Revised ED Page too, which sounds ok. --Anaconda 09:02, 18 December 2009 (CET)

To do/Chris annotating the CWCki

Wikify this biznitch.

Also, if it's any consolation, looks like Chris has discovered CWCki, at least indirectly - the CWCville section of this is more or less a copy paste job from our fine article on CWCville.

I really wish there was a way we could get Chris to look at our superior article on Chris. As you know, the ED article is shit - if you were to go there to find out shit about Chris, you'd leave more confused than when you came. I've talked over with Clyde some way Chris could annotate the CWCki's Chris article but I couldn't think of a good way to present it to Chris in a way that makes sense, not to mention it took Chris a few hours (srsly) to do this annotated ED page. --Champthom 10:24, 18 December 2009 (CET)

Someone did a pretty decent job at summarizing the contents, but opted to put them on the ED page instead of here when I think it'd be more useful to have it here. Looks like we have a Eurofag who did it so I'll start to work on fixing the spellings and links. Someone else can smooth out the summary in terms of style. --Champthom 12:42, 18 December 2009 (CET)

• • Champs, most of the ED page is ripped straight out of the CWCki with no attribution. Go figue. --Delabonte 05:44, 19 December 2009 (CET)

• Christ, this is going to take a while. I'm going to finish wikifying this in a bit, by all means help though. --Champthom 13:30, 18 December 2009 (CET)

• I feel your pain, this is one big cluster of Fail... Griffintown 15:53, 19 December 2009 (CET)

New Summary

Yes, I know it's too much. However, I just felt like compiling this list as a base, a starting point. We can now remove all less notable things, so that only the most valuable instances of Fail would be left! --GokuGetEm 23:50, 19 December 2009 (CET)

• No offense dude but it's not too much, it's way too much. If a summary is as long as the thing it's summarizing, it fails to be a summary. Just saying.--Champthom 00:39, 20 December 2009 (CET)

• Likewise, the solution isn't calling it an "analysis" (not targeting GokuGetEm, just whoever did the Analysis thing). What this article needs is a concise summation of the amusing things Chris says here, not to rewrite everything Chris said. A summary should also be like a Highlights sort of section like "This is important stuff to know" and ideally should be like "I don't feel like reading this shit, what's the jist of what Chris is saying?" --Champthom 11:23, 20 December 2009 (CET)

• Okay, yeah, I see that it's bad... But there's so much Fail! I feel like a kid in a candy shop! Anyway, I think I'll put most of the "insights" into appropriate articles, so they wouldn't be lost. I'll try to leave only the most outrageous stuff here. Ugh... what a tough choice --GokuGetEm 11:40, 20 December 2009 (CET)

What about breaking this article in two? We could have the Summary/Analysis on one side and the historical document on the other. If we compress the analysis, who looks quite good right now, we do discredit to our mission to educate the public about Chris.On the other side, it would sacrilegious to edit the historical document. A two-page solution is a valid answer. Griffintown 04:05, 21 December 2009 (CET)

Starscream Troll

Y'know, thinking about this, I think I understand what Chris means by calling Clyde a "Starscream Troll". He probably assumed that BlueSpike was the big leader of the trolls when he pretended to be Julie (since he was the only one to openly reveal himself to Chris as a troll at the time IIRC) and that when Clyde "killed" him, he most likely compared it to how Starscream took over the Decepticons with Megatron near death in the original Transformers movie, thus also why Chris thinks Clyde's the leader of the trolls.

I might be thinking too hard about this, but that's my thoughts. --Blazer 04:03, 20 December 2009 (CET)

• Clyde presented himself as the leader of The Miscreants. There was a Mumble chat where Clyde was the leader and everyone else was chanting things and stuff like that, like an Inquisition. The Jew Man in the Pickle Suit who stole Emily away from Chris also told Chris that he worked for Clyde. So yeah, Chris isn't assuming this stuff. --Champthom 11:21, 20 December 2009 (CET)
  • I have to admit to not reading this yet (been under a lot of stressful torture), but if there's new information or insights, maybe just leave those for quick reference? Maybe with a link to the section that part is in? It might help you pare it down a bit. --sonichuis44 13:32, 20 December 2009 (CET)
    • Well, I'm currently reworking the list into text form so it would be somewhat easier to read. I'll post the new version soon, and you can see what can be done --GokuGetEm 13:59, 20 December 2009 (CET)

As far as misspelling Santa Claus, I realize that Chris misspelled it, and that you have a weird fixation on his misspellings, but I really think Cwcki's article on Santa should be under the proper spelling. Just my two cents. --sonichuis44 17:23, 20 December 2009 (CET)

• A 'weird fixation'? In a Wiki dedicated solely to Chris? Unconceivable 0-: However, in this case, it's this specific misspelling that never fails to make me RAAAGE for some reason. I think I'm going to make a general article like "Chris and Christmas" or smth, and "Santa Clause" would be a section there. If you think we should ignore Chris's mangling of English, OK, but I thought we prefer using Chris's retarded terms here, rather than normal words (e.g., Duck, Niggos, Tobacky etc.)... However, it's not a very important issue, I'm fine with the normal spelling, too. JOLLY BUDDAH, dude! --GokuGetEm 18:08, 20 December 2009 (CET)
  • Duck, Tobacky, etc. were all intentional misspellings because Chris is too pussy to use cuss words. Santa Clause is probably either Chris trying to be clever or Chris succeeding in being retarded. That said, I think a Chris and Christmas article with mention of Santa Clause would be great!

P.S. I hope you don't think I'm picking on you. I know I remark on a lot of your edits, but it's because you're one of the most prolific editors on here, and our interests seem to overlap. I really do respect you, and I think you do a great job here. And as far as obsession with misspellings... Well, you are the one who wanted to make a list of Chris's misspellings, aren't you? :p --sonichuis44 19:57, 20 December 2009 (CET)

Not so LULZY piping

This page contains a bunch of piping that is less thatn lulzy and in some cases not helpful or funny at all. Rather then me jo going in and fixing it or removing the pipes, i suggest that an admin (or someone with more clout than I) review it