User talk:Champthom

Talk to me.

Be sure to check out the archives as well:

User:Champthom/Archive 1
User:Champthom/Archive 2
User:Champthom/Archive 3
User:Champthom/Archive 4

Upload page

Thank you sir, your change is much appreciated. --Fuckingstupid 12:43, 20 December 2009 (CET)

Sonichu Franchise Games

How about this: User:Dude/Sonichu_Franchise_Games

...replace these:

• Sonichu (game)
• John's Custom Gundam: Sisterly Rescue
• Pokémon:_Lightning_Version
• Sonichu_Adventure
• Sonichu_Advance
• EX-CWC

--Dude 05:47, 22 December 2009 (CET)

Chris's First Interview

I noticed on Talk:Chris-chan_Discusses... you asked for someone to mirror Chris's first interview on Youtube. I know that was a while back, but as far as I can tell no one has actually done it yet, so I went ahead and did it for you [1]. I hope you're pleased. --That Man 23:10, 27 December 2009 (CET)

• just noticed a while ago that it's aleardy been uploaded by The CWCville Library. I have no clue how I was so oblivious to that. --That Man 03:26, 28 December 2009 (CET)

• I didn't notice this either, thank you for telling me about this though and I appreciate your effort anyways.
• Also can't seem to find it on the CWCvilleLibrary...could you possibly post a link?--Champthom 07:49, 28 December 2009 (CET)

Thanks, Champthom

:) --GokuGetEm 09:53, 31 December 2009 (CET)

New Hotness for Videos

Take a look at this template for videos that User:NeoShadow made; it's really sweet. It can wrap around videos (in the middle of the page, where they are now) or it can be used as a sidebar.

• Template: Template:Infobox/video

• Centered example: User:Neoshadow/sandbox/Sonic_Sweepstakes

• Sidebar example: User:Neoshadow/sandbox/Sonic_Sweepstakes2

Thoughts? It's been on the to do list for a while now, and we could get one or the other in place pretty quickly. The big question is which placement to use, and general style questions vis-a-vis the way it looks. Let us know! --Dude 09:43, 3 January 2010 (CET)

• I really like it, but there was some debate (I need to see where) over the usage of video infoboxes, as some people argued it's unnecessarily replicates information one can gleam from the article. However, I think your centered example might solve that as this is ultimately what we can use to replace just pasting the video in Video sections of articles. I think the "Made by" would be useless in 99% of situations (with the very few videos made by other people, such as the Watch and Win one, or the videos by Scarlet). Personally I like your infoboxes, but I'm not sure if everyone else likes it elsewhere.

Best I'd do is mention this in the community portal. As I said, I think your centered example might be very useful and a nicer display than just a YouTube video in the video section. --Champthom 12:11, 3 January 2010 (CET)

• This add-on is useless and redundant if you ask me. There's nothing new here you can't read in the introduction of the video, in the video navigation bar and I don't see the need for the "Festive" icons. I respect the efforts but I am a K.I.S.S.-Type of guy. Griffintown 15:02, 3 January 2010 (CET)

IMPOSTORS

Hey Champ, this is the "dude" from the old CWCki... somebody claimed my nick in the three hours between Cogs fixing the captcha and me checking back in =( Is there anything we can do about this? I can still log into the old CWCki to prove my TRUTH and HONESTY, and I used the same email signing up here (this account) and there (the old "dude"). --Umad 05:12, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

• I'll consult with Cogs later tonight, as I'm not sure if we can kick this other "Dude" off and have you have his nickname, especially given that it's an extremely generic name someone could have chosen (like Anonymous or Nobody or some name like that) or if we can do this, if it is right in doing so. Now I am concerned that people might try to leech off the fame of others by signing up for accounts of previous CWCki users, either to jump start their e-fame or as a way of trolling, so I'll need a second opinion. If anyone wants to weigh in on the matter, by all means do so. --Champthom 10:57, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
  • Yeah, it's pretty generic, but at the same time, I only signed up around October, so it wasn't generic enough to be taken by then. I am kind of surprised that somebody snapped it up so quickly, since I was pretty actively trying to get it back myself. I suppose it could be innocent, but it's still kind of frustrating. Thanks for looking into it. --Umad 14:52, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

can you give him the account back. i didn't know. i didnt think dude was gona be available, i though i got lucky. didnt mean to steal it, ill make another one Dude 00:26, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

• No problem Dude (see what I did there?). Okay, here's how this will go down - new Dude, when you get a new account, AIM or message me in IRC when you do. I will merge your current account into your new one. That will free up the username "Dude" and old Dude can register that way. rpoblem oslved. If there's any problems, you guys let me know because then I have to resort to Plan B. --Champthom 01:36, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
• New Dude has been inactive for about a week now... can I get my account back? --Umad 17:49, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

• The new Dude needs to contact me so I can merge his old account into the new one, thus freeing up "Dude." If he doesn't respond in 24 hours or so, then contact me and I'll reset the password and give it over to you. --Champthom 04:57, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

I'll not take this treachery sitting down!

You dare claim superiority over my powers as a great and terrifying wizard!? You shall soon see the error of your ways, good sir Champthom. I am a vengeful spellcaster, and I will rape you furiously in your sleep. Artiph the Destroyer, Omniscient Archmage, bearer of the Grimoire of Destruction, whose powers by and large surpass that of the Great Wizard CrassCrab, Lord of the Seven Realm and Master of the Archane Black Arts of the Eleventh Trans-Dimensional Vortex 11:03, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

Sup

Have a job for me? You told me to get in touch... --Fuckingstupid 19:38, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

• Well I was going to ask you to help upload images but people got onto that which is good.--Champthom 21:57, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

• Coolio. On Another note, don't bother restoring my Jerkop status. I don't need it now seeing as how images have a MUCH higher ceiling. I'll stick around to improve articles and help people with images if they need it. --Fuckingstupid 10:02, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

SPECIAL MISSION

I accept. Should I simply sign up for an account on Asperpedia and get started or what? --Fuckingstupid 09:19, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

• Yeah, do that - sign up for an Asperpedia account and go zap to the extreme. --Champthom 11:17, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Just to let you know

There's a new user who registered under the name ChristianWestonChandler. I am watching this account since it came online. I just don't get a good feeling about this. Griffintown 07:00, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Apologies

Thank you for fixing that mistake, that was the first time I added a template so I really am horrible at it. --Hieghts503 5:05 20 January 2010 (CET)

Chris's resume

Would you please be so kind as to move this to Chris's résumé for the sake of more accurate spelling, and to satisfy the grammar nazi in me? If you don't know how to make the fancy és, just copy and paste mine. Apostrophe 04:22, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

• Also, please to be deleting Chris and fame. Broken redirect. Apostrophe 20:15, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

A new Mailbag bombing

Well, our dear Christian has now started giving a copy paste reply as his new method of rejection. And hes done it to Mike Jackson's widow. We had a quick discussion about that in the talk page, and we thought it'd be an idea for another mailbag thats just filled entirely with letters about this one subject. Like how we had a whole mailbag asking about Asperchu and stuff like that? I thought we could have another of those; Only this time have an entire mailbag of people calling him out for being such a prick and for still not properly ansewing letters. What do you think Champ? --Edward 18:59, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

• To amend that idea, I suggest having Sysop inform him of another pending legal issue that can only be averted if he gives full replies to each email--he can't use the "Inputed" response or delete the whole thing and replace it with a general response or else the site goes down again or something.--MoarLurk 19:32, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

• Agreed. We need some sort of cover from him rejecting it in any way. --Edward 20:56, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Politics

Please to be deleting. Broken redirect. Apostrophe 01:11, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Sandy Rosechu

Any idea why Sandy Rosechu is showing up in Category:Templates? Apostrophe 22:17, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

• Fixed it. The Squote template didn't have noinclude wrapped around its category. --T K 19 22:21, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
  • That was my fault. --Mikhail Faulken 22:24, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

halp

Yo Champers, could you derete this page here: http://www.cogsdev.org/cwcki/Template:Christory/March_07 ? It will be confus if it doesn't turn up as a red link. Sorry for mistake. RachmaninovDESU 15:00, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

YO!

Champ old boy, do you have sauce on this here sniplet? It must have slipped right past me, and now I want to know what it is! RachmaninovDESU 02:09, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

Jerkops Anonymous

Hey, Champthom. I've been in the mood to move a page or two recently, but my jerkop privileges were abolished with the move to CWCki 2.0. Would you mind reinstating them? Llort 03:14, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Cole Smithey

Don't you think an edit like this seems too intentional to be an impostor? Never mind 30+ edits to the Cole Smithey article? Apostrophe 18:13, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Re: Pic of Wallflower

Is this ok? It was shopped and It looks less like a man

-Psycatalyst 04:02, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Posse

Champ, I don't know if you still need monitors, but I have no life and lurk on the CWCki pretty much all day. Hit me up if you need me. --YawningSquirtleRedux 04:06, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

• NO U. Srsly, contact me on AIM or IRC tonight. --Champthom 04:07, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Summaries

Ok, so I will check. I've started trying to sort and format the summaries for each of the Mumbles, and it's March Mumble Madness, but I seem to have contradicted instructions (as I discovered having worked on ALL of them), by listing rather than writing a narrative. What is it you want exactly, so I can get on it ASAP. --YawningSquirtleRedux 04:11, 18 March 2010 (UTC)22:40, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Article of the Now

You wanted some sort of template to denote former articles of the now? How's this? --YawningSquirtleRedux 19:58, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

• Clyde already made something, just need to incorporate it. --Champthom 20:06, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
• Late to the party again. Never mind --YawningSquirtleRedux 20:23, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

List of Chris' lies

Okay, I trust your judgment on this. Wasn't sure if cleanup or deletion was the better solution and it looks like I chose wrong. Apostrophe 20:36, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Quality Control jerkops

Hey, I saw your comment re "Quality Control" jerkops, of which none seem to be active at this point. I think I could handle that. Apostrophe 21:12, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Champ old boy

People want to update Fan:Sonichu: The Animated Series, could you unlock it for a while? RachmaninovDESU 09:12, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Userboxes

Is it cool for users to make new rewards\userboxes, like the Grammar Nazi and Assburgers ones, for instance? Some wikis I've edited on don't like for you to make new ones due to space or whatnot, and others let you go crazy with it. Just want to check beforehand. BubblegumPinkButler 03:22, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

• Yeah, it's alright, just don't go too crazy by making a kajillion of them. Some of the useboxes, like the Jerkop, Admin, etc. are obviously protected and it's poor taste to award yourself awards like the Order of the Pickle, etc. --Champthom 04:44, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

April Fool's Day

Since its going to be april fools day when the ultimatum expires why dont we just shut down for 1 day and let chris think he's won. I mean worst that can happpen is he forgets about us, or the best is that he actually makes a "victory over cwcki" vid.

and then bring it back on the 2nd with a big fuck you chris

user: DKD 15.13 GMT 31.3.10

• No. That's stupid. Chris will make a "HA HA I GOT U TROLLS" video and quit paying attention to us because he thinks we are gone. If we stay up, we will have our own FUCK YOU CHRIS simply because we're not down. This will make Chris angry, and angry Chris is funny.--MoarLurk 14:18, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

• Never compromise, even in the face of Armageddon April Fool's Day. Also, in the future, make a sub heading (it's two equal signs, then your text, followed by two equal signs). --Champthom 17:32, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

This makes me worry now. What if Chris is pulling a long, convoluted April Fools prank, possibly the idea of a white knight? --Zehnfragezeichen 16:18, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

• Don't be silly. The only White Knight who he listens to is Rocky, and even then, only just barely. And whats the chances that a church counsellor is going to come troll us? I think we're safe. Its almost certain that his plan consists of 'blank pages' and 'try to find and stab the webmaster' --Edward 16:32, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

How bout we say that both bob and snorlax are dead, and put 14 Branchland Court up for sale? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dan Dash (talk • contribs)

• Please, for the love of God, sign your comments. It's four tildas (~) in a row. I'm tempted to start banning people (albeit temporarily) for those who can't learn how to sign their fucking posts. --Champthom 22:28, 31 March 2010 (UTC)