Difference between revisions of "User talk:Larry the Larryhog"
Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
That disambiguation page has no reason to exist. ―[[User:KUG.SIG17|KUG.SIG17]] ([[User talk:KUG.SIG17|talk]]) 22:07, 18 July 2022 (UTC) | That disambiguation page has no reason to exist. ―[[User:KUG.SIG17|KUG.SIG17]] ([[User talk:KUG.SIG17|talk]]) 22:07, 18 July 2022 (UTC) | ||
::There is a [[Surfshack Tito (video)|video]] that Chris uploaded that has the exact same name as the troll. -[[User:Larry the Larryhog|Larry the Larryhog]] ([[User talk:Larry the Larryhog|talk]]) 04:50, 19 July 2022 (UTC) | ::There is a [[Surfshack Tito (video)|video]] that Chris uploaded that has the exact same name as the troll. -[[User:Larry the Larryhog|Larry the Larryhog]] ([[User talk:Larry the Larryhog|talk]]) 04:50, 19 July 2022 (UTC) | ||
:::Yes, [[Surfshack Tito (video)]] stays the same and the content of [[Surfshack Tito (troll)]] is moved to the current disambiguation page. The two pages are very different in importance, and I assume everyone who searches or links to ‘Surfshack Tito’ is thinking of the troll, not the video. Here’s {{w|WP:PRIMARYTOPIC|Wikipedia’s policy}}: ‘A topic is primary for a term with respect to usage if it is highly likely—much more likely than any other single topic, and more likely than all the other topics combined—to be the topic sought when a reader searches for that term.’ --[[User:KUG.SIG17|KUG.SIG17]] ([[User talk:KUG.SIG17|talk]]) 11:03, 19 July 2022 (UTC) |
Revision as of 06:03, 19 July 2022
PROTIP:
Please do not warn me about the spambots. I can easily know what and where they are.
|
Sonichu: The Animated Series Discussion
Dude the one before is way much better, why change to this simple and mediocre one?
- The article I changed into is captured from the Wayback Machine from 2015, before it was deleted. I initially created the page to recreate how the article was. Also, I thought the current article is a bit too cluttered and full of unnecessary info and lacks videos. And one more thing Mokele95, SIGN YOUR POST. This can be done by pressing "~" four times. -Larry the Larryhog (talk) 20:39, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
- I agree that maybe the article needs video links, but I don't see how it's cluttered with unnecessary info.Y0h 513nn R3n (talk) 18:31, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
- To me, the article talks a little too much about Spazkid and some of the minor characters in the series. There are also too much speculations in Chris' thoughts subsection. -Larry the Larryhog (talk) 19:48, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
- I agree that maybe the article needs video links, but I don't see how it's cluttered with unnecessary info.Y0h 513nn R3n (talk) 18:31, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
- The article I changed into is captured from the Wayback Machine from 2015, before it was deleted. I initially created the page to recreate how the article was. Also, I thought the current article is a bit too cluttered and full of unnecessary info and lacks videos. And one more thing Mokele95, SIGN YOUR POST. This can be done by pressing "~" four times. -Larry the Larryhog (talk) 20:39, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
My Interaction with Sean Miller
Please delete thatstupid page about me
- No problem, just don’t self promote yourself on your user page and sign yout post by pressing ~ 4 times. -Larry the Larryhog (talk) 12:27, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
Stfu I didnt make it. Just delete the damn thing
Financhu Wordle
In Financhu Wordle.png, I noticed that the word “flub” seems to be the most used word. I know of the The Brothers Flub video, but as a person freshly interested in the Sonichu saga, are there any other videos where he said “flub”?
I ask this because I probably have to explain why “flub” appears to be the most used word in the wordle (in the Financhu Crisis article). --Little Owl (talk) 23:12, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
- A quick google search tells me that to "flub" is a blunder or to make a blunder. He probably used it in a way that the mistakes he made prior caused the crisis. -Larry the Larryhog (talk) 00:14, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
- I understand the definition of “flub”: the question is whether the Facebook posts or The Brothers Flub video was the main factor in the size, in order to clear things up for readers of the Financhu Crisis article. It is worth noting that I do not use (and have never used) Facebook due to the numerous problems with the site, and the fact that Facebook is just a waste of time for me. Thanks in advance anyway, --Little Owl (talk) 13:54, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
- It has nothing to do with the cartoon series. "Flub" is a slang term used in North America, something Chris would be familiar with. I agree with you on how word was mostly used in Facebook. -Larry the Larryhog (talk) 14:50, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
- I understand the definition of “flub”: the question is whether the Facebook posts or The Brothers Flub video was the main factor in the size, in order to clear things up for readers of the Financhu Crisis article. It is worth noting that I do not use (and have never used) Facebook due to the numerous problems with the site, and the fact that Facebook is just a waste of time for me. Thanks in advance anyway, --Little Owl (talk) 13:54, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
- A quick google search tells me that to "flub" is a blunder or to make a blunder. He probably used it in a way that the mistakes he made prior caused the crisis. -Larry the Larryhog (talk) 00:14, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
It's all good, thanks: after all, I am from the other side of the Atlantic. --Little Owl (talk) 19:29, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
New Spambots
LizzieUpchurch, GWULinwood and JoseKeisler0 are spamming stuff about San Francisco and Penis enlargement pills. Homsar (talk) 04:42, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
- Done. -Larry the Larryhog (talk) 06:15, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
More Spambots
There are more spambots attacking the wiki. I've added in the deletion template on all of them. Can you do something about this? If so, thank you! The amazing owen (talk) 19:18, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
- Done -Larry the Larryhog (talk) 21:09, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
Reducing the impact of spambots
I’ve asked Canine to see if they can add a few extensions to reduce the impact of the spambots. I suggested UserMerge, which would allow you to merge the spambots into one blocked account. I also suggested activating the Renameuser extension to deal with the spam accounts whose user names are spam itself, but I think we would end up using the former more than the latter.
Sorry for sounding too technical, but as I said to Hurtful Truth Level, I have experience in running MediaWiki sites. Best regards, --Little Owl (talk) 23:13, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
Dated Template
Hey, I've noticed that my edits to the Dated template have been reverted. I just feel like we need the template updated seeing how Bob is already dead, and the image that Chris just took of his mother just seemed a bit more fitting, as she does look to be on the verge of her deathbed as well. PsychoNerd054 (talk) 04:17, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
- I don't know, I just don't like the new pic of Barb being used for the template. And it's not just because of its angle. Maybe we should upload a cropped version to fit it better? -Larry the Larryhog (talk) 04:21, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
- Maybe instead of using a person, we could use an object that suggests the passage of time. Like File:Frozen sperm (720p).mp400001.png or File:ChrisC64Tapes.jpg. Hurtful Truth Level (talk) 04:18, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
- Good Point, if we use Barb, who is probably going to die soon, it have the same problems as having Bob in the template.PsychoNerd054 (talk) 04:21, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
transcriptions
Is there an official page on how trancriptions are supposed to look. For example in the Jack Thaddeus calls the entire sentences are couloured, whereas in the other trabscriptions only the names are coloured. Which one do I follow?- Klop (talk) 16:51, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
- The official transcription protocol from what I know calls for only the names to be colored. Because of that, I suggest you follow the latter. Look here for more info.-Larry the Larryhog (talk) 18:58, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
Got it, should I edit that page and add that only the names must be coloured. Also completed Jack call 1. I'll do the others when I want something mind numbingly boring to do.Klop (talk) 02:42, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
- It's up to you now. -Larry the Larryhog (talk) 15:47, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Discord
Hey, you joined the discord today right? Just realised that I should have confirmed before giving mod. - klop (talk)
- That was me, thanks for the confirmation. -Larry the Larryhog (talk) 17:49, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
Operation Snowball article
Hey, just wondering about the article "Operation Snowball" that you created. Where did you find that/is there a source we can attribute? Holdek (talk) 17:58, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Can you please rename Surfshack Tito (troll) to just Surfshack Tito?
That disambiguation page has no reason to exist. ―KUG.SIG17 (talk) 22:07, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
- There is a video that Chris uploaded that has the exact same name as the troll. -Larry the Larryhog (talk) 04:50, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, Surfshack Tito (video) stays the same and the content of Surfshack Tito (troll) is moved to the current disambiguation page. The two pages are very different in importance, and I assume everyone who searches or links to ‘Surfshack Tito’ is thinking of the troll, not the video. Here’s Wikipedia’s policy: ‘A topic is primary for a term with respect to usage if it is highly likely—much more likely than any other single topic, and more likely than all the other topics combined—to be the topic sought when a reader searches for that term.’ --KUG.SIG17 (talk) 11:03, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
- There is a video that Chris uploaded that has the exact same name as the troll. -Larry the Larryhog (talk) 04:50, 19 July 2022 (UTC)