Talk:Some Favored Comedians

Where's the video? --BreadGod 20:34, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

It will be available soon. It's still processing [1] --Anonymax 20:36, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

I see. I wonder if he'll bore us like with the last video. --BreadGod 20:36, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

Oh god, I'm only a minute in and he's back to ranting about the Cleavland Show.--MoarLurk 20:47, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

He's got to be the only fan of that show. I watched it before and I thought it was painfully unfunny. --BreadGod 21:06, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

Same here, BreadGod. In many ways, "The Cleveland Show" is a lot like Sonichu. They're both unfunny, unoriginal, and were bad ideas to begin with. --SpaceScreaminJohn 17:34, 20 May 2010

I bet when Fox cancels the Cleveland Show (and they will, everyone i know hates that garbage), I totally expect CWC to rage about it and blame the leaving of that voice actress for the cancellation --This post brought to you by ShotgunJones 03:35, 21 May 2010 (UTC). Thanks for reading!

Is it bad that I misread the title as "Semen Flavored Condoms"? --Espanolic 21:00, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

No. Pfargtl9000 21:58, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

Transcription

I'm going to make a start on it from the beginning, if anyone elsewants to start from like 5min in or something. --Anonymax 21:00, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

Everything past the 5 minute mark is my BITCH. A BITCH I must TRANSRIBE.--Beat 21:03, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

Ahaha his new stock insult is that WE are the autistics what the fuck. Somebody dig up some reaction photos of these comedians. Hopefully ones that are a mixture of confused, afraid and furious.--Beat 21:20, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

Ah shit, I gotta go and not be glued in front of my computer like an autistic for a few hours. I transcribed up to 8:07. Someone pick up my slack.--Beat 21:35, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

I've finished it. Since I didn't know most of the things Chris was quoting in badly performed impressions, I tried to look them up. I've left 2 gaps where I just had no idea what he was saying - I could pick out words but it would look better if someone who knew the quotes could fill them in. I linked most names to Wikipedia, to help those people out there who have never heard of the names Chris spouts out. --Anonymax 01:04, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

I got up to the point where he complains about the voice be whiney and hi-pitched... Couldn't take the irony --SargentPickles 17:22, 20 May 2010 (EST)

Cameos

Wall of originals, marge poster sailor moon poster, and guitar of fail cameos, also, no medal and he is still going bald 1:53, also, is it me or the angle of the camera makes Chris look like a Charger from LFD2? .Basgon 21:30, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

It certainly looks like Chris has been using his right hand a lot more than his left. Sakanz 22:28, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

The Shirt

Can we call this one "The Redneck"? It's the same getup that he had in his hookcafe pic so it deserves some recognition. --Caboose -1 21:32, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

• I prefer "Cool guy" because it's Chris's pathetic attempt to seem cool. Oh, I added a thing at the beginning mentioning some topics Chris brings up--WarOfTheBees 21:38, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
  • How about "The Poser"? --Sack Thaddic 21:40, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
  • maybe "The Homo" or "Flabby Arms" or "The rebel"Basgon 21:43, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

• Actually, how about "Trucker Man". It fit Chris so well in the video when he failed at impersonating Larry the Cable Guy --Caboose -1 22:03, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

• "The Trucker" sounds about right. --Anonymax 23:22, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

• Voting for "The Trucker".--Beat 02:19, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
• The Trucker Look is what he described it to Sydney as, so I'm voting for 'The Trucker'. That and I must automatically agree with anything Beat says because he is awesome. --Ronichu 04:55, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

• I also vote for "The Trucker."--SpaceScreaminJohn 20:18 20 May 2010 (PST)

• "The Trucker" has my vote as well. RobGoblin 06:03, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

• Has he stopped wearing his muscle bra? Those titties are out in full force.

...

Fucktard. He wants Jerry Seinfeld to make a video response to this. He thinks that A) He's worth Jerry's time. B) Jerry wastes his time on YouTube, as opposed to spending his time being rich (an enjoyable activity, or so I've heard). C) Jerry watches Chris' videos. D) Jerry would respond positively to this manchild. Fuck him. I've read pretty much every article on this wiki, and I've watched the vast majority of his videos. For some reason, this idea makes me more irritated with him than anything else he's done combined, maybe just because it's in the present, but also because it compounds the whole issue with this kid. I hate the fucker. Thelieisacake 22:33, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

• And the kicker? Even if all of the above were true, Chris probably wouldn't watch it. Or, if a troll forced him too, he'd just say 'it's okay'. Awesome. --Ronichu 23:52, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

He misses the internet

He misses the internet. He misses us. How long can it be before he's back cursing trolls and zapping to the extreme? Baxter 23:18, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

I'll give him until August. That's usually when he comes back to the internet in full force. --BreadGod 23:54, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

I have the weird feeling that someone (Rocky) gave him strict rules for the content of his YouTube videos. Things like talking only about non-personal subjects like reflections on current news and shows. The first minute is quite reveleating; he WANTS to talk to the trolls. He's almost begging for it.. When his "Internet Probation" will be lifted, We will be treated with a couple of 'Tard-Rage videos. Griffintown 02:57, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

Rocky can't watch over Chris forever. One of these days, she'll think that Chris has finally changed his ways and turn a blind eye. When that happens, Chris will return. --BreadGod 03:53, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

In fact, Rocky's influence is already slipping. Chris added in the video comments about Jews, his family's health status and special pleading for his autism. This is the same tactic he used in the video "It's Okay To Be Gay"; tell everything they want you to say but slip from time to time. Oh yes, he's coming back. Griffintown 04:03, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

Can anyone do a good Seinfeld impression?

We should have audio of Seinfeld performing Christian's material, except, you know, worded like actual sentences. If no one else can do one, I guess I'll just try and do it. Graduon4eva 02:58, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

• You don't need to do a good impersonation to trick Chris. Inkmonkey 12:00, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

THERE IS NO DIFFERENCE!

Maybe it's just me, but am I the only one who doesn't notice any difference between the two voice actresses on "The Cleveland Show." Maybe it's the horrible audio quality on Chris's PSEye, but I can't hear any difference. --SpaceScreaminJohn 03:23, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

Seemed slightly higher-pitched to me, but seeing as how her character is supposed to be a teenage girl, it's not a big deal. Also, he's not recording with the PSeye. You can see it on top of the TV in the background.--T K 19 05:10, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

As someone that watches the show... Yes, there is an immediately noticeable difference between the two voice actresses, and yes, the new one is... Grating. That said, it's not the sort of thing that deserves the amount of attention Chris has given it. RobGoblin 06:06, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, I know, not a forum, but.

Has anyone noticed how he referred to himself in the third-person (through Seinfeld) as a teenager? Isn't that a bit odd? I know it's old news he's mentally stuck as a teenager, but still. He said it himself. Edit: Ffff. Didn't re-read the article. For some reasn when I originally wanted to post this, the whole thing error'd on me. So yeah, ignore my observation.

• Sign your post please. Also, it may be that he was speculating that he'd be confused for a teenager--he seems convinced that he hasn't changed at all physically since high school.--MoarLurk 06:59, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
  • My impression was that he was just talking about some random autistic teenager. Granted, the only person Chris cares about is Chris, so you had better belive that this random teenager would basically be Chris in every way shape and form.--Beat 07:01, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
• As I have read earlier, I think he's using the third person because he want to talk about himself while somebody (Rocky) forbids him to do so. Griffintown 12:45, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

Derp, my bad. DonnieDarko 15:43, 26 May 2010 (UTC)Donnie Darko

Chris and Comedy

Anyone think that this could be a good basis for a 'Chris and Comedy' page? This isn't really Random Access Humor, it is just unfunny. Chris thinks that his weird, rambling stand-up thing about autism, that contains no actual jokes, is funny. Any thoughts? Hazard 09:04, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

The Random-Access-Humor page really IS Chris and comedy for all intents and purposes. Let's focus on rewriting it before we make another "Chris And..." page. A good place to start that would be the Regina E-mails, as they contain both examples of Random Acess Humor, and Chris's bizarre attempts at justifying it.--Beat 13:46, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

How about we merge random access humour into Minor CWCisms and we make a 'humour' page about Chris's relation to comedy in general. All the non randomness related stuff from the RAH page can go there, as well as anything we can get out of this. Thoughts? --Edward 18:36, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

The "Chris and..." Pages are some of my favorites, so I'm all for creating a "Chris and Comedy/Humor/Whatever" page, assuming there's sufficient material/analysis to justify it. RobGoblin 03:37, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

The Chris And... pages are the ones that should be held to the highest standards, so if you're going to do Chris and Comedy, I suggest you spend some time drafting it first.--Beat 16:03, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

• As Beat said, the Random-Access Humor is for all extensive purposes "Chris and humor." The thing with "Chris and..." page is that this can be done with any page on the CWCki. The Sonichu comic could easily become "Chris and his comic." Bob Chandler could easily become "Chris and his father." I think I might have made the first "Chris and..." pages mostly in the same vein of Wikipedia pages where topics that were too long or too distracting to be discussed on a main page would get their own page for a more in depth look (for instance, the Wikipedia page on "Abraham Lincoln's sexuality" would by too long and too distracting in tone and content for the main article on Abraham Lincoln). However I'm not a fan of them because mostly they've become essays which are fun to read but mostly speculative and mostly a way for people to justify their e-psychiatry or whatever personal views of Chris. So yeah, you could easily do "Chris and humor" in Random-Access Humor. I don't think there's really enough incidents of non-random access humor that would warrant its own page. --Champthom 13:23, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Thats why I suggested a 'Humour' page rather than a 'Chris and Humour' page. I feel that we should make a page just about 'Humour'. One word. Just like 'Parody' or 'Homos'. The Humour page would then talk about Christian's relationship to humour, both random and this sort of shit. Most of the stuff from the current RAH page would go there. Then RAH is turned into a redirect to a small section in Minor CWCisms about the term 'Random Acess Humour' itself, and what exactly it means. Thoughts? --Edward 15:07, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

I concur. Sounds like a plan, but what you're talking about would absolutely be a Chris and... page. --DStecks 02:53, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Chris types a phrase, Latches onto it, Never lets go.

I just realized the end of his Jerry Sienfeld thing (Which I am a less funny person for having transcribed) is just a repeat of his response to Vivian when she sent him the Toucher and Rich Segment. While I doubt this will become the next "Flies on a Garbage Dump" it always strikes me as interesting when Chris starts recycling a line.--Beat 15:54, 23 May 2010 (UTC)