Talk:Saga

Add the sagas that we have from the List of Videos page and describe the overarching storylines in each. --Champthom 14:09, 19 October 2009 (CEST)

• i think a visual representation of the sagas would greatly improve the article. a vertical, multi-part image would work quite well, i think, but all ideas are welcome. thoughts? --cogsdev/vedsgoc 17:09, 19 October 2009 (CEST)

• A visual representation would be awesome, I'm just not an artsy kind of guy to do that :3. --Champthom 17:53, 19 October 2009 (CEST)

• Oh, maybe Cogs was thinking like a timeline with shadded parts to indicate sagas and show the overlaps. Very good idea, even I could do that. --Champthom 16:17, 20 October 2009 (CEST)

• I'll start compiling images for each section. I'll try my best anyway. --Fuckingstupid 22:49, 23 October 2009 (CEST)

Changes

So basically what I tried to do so far is sum up every saga in 3 images. Is this at all helpful? I can upload colour versions instead if we prefer, but I thought this looked kind of good. I can also put all of them together to make a MEGASAGA sort of image that we can add to as more sagas become apparent. What do we want? Or delete them if you think they are gay. If they are not gay, then I will finish the rest tomorrow. ALSO: I can make a vertically oriented timeline (like from a history book) showing how they progress and overlap. Or horizontally, whatever we want really. Just tell me. For now, I need to sleep. --Fuckingstupid 01:25, 24 October 2009 (CEST)

• I actually really like these. Anaconda 03:38, 24 October 2009 (CEST)

• I like them. Though I think that like, the subject of the saga should be in the center. Like, the Miyamoto saga, Reggie is in the middle when it really should be Miyamoto. If I may recommend one for Liquid, if there was a way to make it look like they're staring down each other, that'd be cool. Otherwise, nice work, I like the general idea. --Champthom 03:47, 24 October 2009 (CEST)

• Your wish is my command. It is done. I think I got what you wanted for the Liquid saga too... Now what exactly? I can get started on a timeline. I guess I will work on making each subsection more introductory in the text too... --Fuckingstupid 20:49, 24 October 2009 (CEST)
• So I have added some detail to give a bit more advanced insight on the sagas for this page. I hope it is helpful. Are there any other sagas that should be here? I assume not. What do we need to add to make this... complete... --Fuckingstupid 01:23, 25 October 2009 (CEST)

Timeline

So the timeline you see running here is one I made for this article. Problem, When I run it down the right side of the article it looks funny. At least I think it does. Try it. Should we put it there... or what? I will just work on the actual text of this article until we decide what to do about the imagery. --Fuckingstupid 22:33, 24 October 2009 (CEST)

• I haven't heard any opinions on this and they claimed to like it in IRC so I have it running down the right. Revert it if you like. --Fuckingstupid 22:41, 25 October 2009 (CET)

• I like it a lot too. Having it up and down isn't orthodox but it's well suited for the media. Very nice job. --Champthom 19:55, 30 October 2009 (CET)

• I think it looks great, but I think the information is a bit wrong... the Megan Saga went on through the beginning of 2008 and into the ED and Adam Stackhouse affairs. Hell, there wouldn't be a Stackhouse Saga without Megan. Otherwise, it looks good.

---

Kwippleton 06:51, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Gregg Mays saga

Not sure if we should consider it part of Clyde Cash saga but we should consider a Gregg Mays saga to include all this Gregg Mays stuff. --Champthom 19:55, 30 October 2009 (CET)

Jack Thaddeus Saga, anyone?

Or does anyone think it's too early? --CWCAttack 03:42, 2 January 2010 (CET)

• I was about to suggest the same thing. With the recent videos aimed at him, the three phone calls and the CWCipedia ad shenanigans, not to mention previous antics, there seems to be enough material to warrant a new saga. --Lime 05:17, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
  • Don't forget about Asperchu in the future. Seeing how dedicated Alec is with it so far (and Jack just started advertising his wiki in CWCipedia), a Saga for that is inevitable! --CWCAttack 05:32, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    • And I think it has begun! --Blazer 02:02, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
      • Asperchu Asperchu Saga. You like? --Jewlay 02:05, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
        • Very nice! Now how about Jack, anyone? --CWCAttack 02:08, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
        • Awesome job on the icon! --Lime 02:09, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

Actually...

Looking at recent edits, someone was adding a "Homosexual ad saga" to this page but it was reverted. While not a proper saga, I'd say it's a sort of mini saga and it's part of the Chris narrative, as it leads into Asperchu saga. Thoughts? --Champthom 21:49, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

I'm not sure I'd call the homosexual ads a saga by itself, but part of a CWCipedia saga? I'm certainly not part of the inner circle, but I imagine more hi-jinks involving the CWCipedia are in store. Chris fangs 21:54, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

• I reverted it. It wasn't a proper saga, no. Even if it could be considered one, the information wasn't presented well enough. I first reverted the changes made to the timeline PNG[1], which also wasn't up to par. There could be a lead-in to the Asperchu Saga, sure, but I would vote no on calling it a saga. --Jewlay 22:02, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
• I re-reverted because you're a huge faggot have a nice day Nitrocore

• Actually, I changed my mind. If someone could make a better, more convincing presentation of it, go ahead. --Jewlay 22:16, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

• I agree that the presentation on the timeline sucks, and the name "Homosexual ad saga" does as well. I think Chris fangs is onto something about it being called "CWCipedia saga" since in a way, the Mailbag is a way of trolling Chris and CWCipedia in general sorta inadvertently trolls Chris. Thoughts? --Champthom 22:20, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

• Well, it seems I've angered someone. Not my intentions, to be sure. Anyway, CWCipedia Saga has a nice ring to it and it's relevant, since the Mailbag is certainly a repository of ongoing trolling. --Jewlay 22:28, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
• Champthom, I'll leave it to you to revert the timeline image/Saga page or not. I don't wish to get into a revert war over Chris Chan. --Jewlay 22:34, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

• I'm not saying you're wrong, I'm just saying that you're right but so is Nitrocore. The concept of a saga invoking CWCipedia, perhaps call it CWCipedia saga, is good or maybe Jack Thaddeus saga (though I'm aiming at the former) but you are correct in that the write up and the name at the time did kinda suck, and we still need to work on the timeline. For starters, we need to get in touch with the original creator of the timeline or maybe start from scratch. --Champthom 22:58, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

• Ha i win sucker, I actually like "Cwc saga" as well i was just adding stuff(unlike you) if you can combine it and possibly make it better with external links then I'm not bothered Nitrocore

• I went with the CWCipedia idea. It's a rough draft, but you get the idea. Nitro, if there is a next time, try not to act like a child. Also, sign your discussion edits with the timestamp. --Jewlay 00:37, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

The CWCki Saga, anyone?

I was going to start this, but decided otherwise unless objects to it, but what we got here is the start of a third saga - CWCki Saga. Chris knows about the CWCki and now he wants to take control of it. You think we should start gathering information on this?--Blazer 05:19, 11 March 2010 (UTC)