Difference between revisions of "Talk:Joe Biden"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Cottonmather (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
Chris wasn't silent about her and he is now very pro Kamala. It's just that he doesn't tweet about politics nowadays. He never once brought up Trump after returning to the internet. | Chris wasn't silent about her and he is now very pro Kamala. It's just that he doesn't tweet about politics nowadays. He never once brought up Trump after returning to the internet. | ||
:Agreed. Did some rewriting, and made it a subsection. I cut the Clinton comparison out, not sure that's really needed. [[User:Hurtful Truth Level|Hurtful Truth Level]] ([[User talk:Hurtful Truth Level|talk]]) 23:56, 10 September 2024 (EDT) | :Agreed. Did some rewriting, and made it a subsection. I cut the Clinton comparison out, not sure that's really needed. [[User:Hurtful Truth Level|Hurtful Truth Level]] ([[User talk:Hurtful Truth Level|talk]]) 23:56, 10 September 2024 (EDT) | ||
== Is a separate page for Kamala Harris warranted at this point? == | |||
Chris has spent basically all of the past 2 months posting about and retweeting her. He's been infinitely more vocal about her than he was about Biden. [[User:Cottonmather|Cottonmather]] ([[User talk:Cottonmather|talk]]) 01:01, 3 November 2024 (EST) |
Revision as of 01:01, 3 November 2024
Relevant?
Biden doesn't seem to be very relevant to Chris, he's only mentioned him a couple times, and most of this article is about Trump. Maybe this would be better as a redirect to Pmurt? Hurtful Truth Level (talk) 23:53, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
- The Election itself warrants its own article, especially if Chris confirms that he did vote for Lisa Simpson (see User:Anaxis/CWC Questions Depository).
- I am leaning on keeping Joe Biden for now, because Chris will inevitably mention him (whether or not he asserts that Lisa is the president in C-197): however, it is going to need a rewrite to reduce duplication. --Little Owl (talk) 07:35, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
- I second this. We have articles on every president since George W. Bush, so there's no reason to end that tradition. Superspongebobbros (talk) 08:43, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
- The tradition should only be maintained if there's enough relevance. Bush, Obama and Trump have been mentioned by Chris enough times and in humorous enough ways to warrant articles. Which isn't the case with Biden so far. I just think we should avoid going too off-topic with the political stuff since Chris himself barely cares about it. Lisa Simpson would probably be a better article for the CWCki's scope; Biden/the 2020 election can be mentioned in it. Hurtful Truth Level (talk) 09:56, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
- It depends on whether the Dimensional Merge is completed before noon today in DC (see Discord Q&A 5, "Operation of CWCville's Government" section). So far, Chris has not yet proclaimed the "completion of it", and it is possible that he may have to backtrack on it like the previous attempt. That is why I am waiting for further developments before making a final decision on it. --Little Owl (talk) 11:06, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
- Update: according to January 2021 social media posts#Congrats, Joe Biden, the US now appears to have co-presidents in the Sonichu universe. --Little Owl (talk) 23:43, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
Rewrite of Harris part.
Chris wasn't silent about her and he is now very pro Kamala. It's just that he doesn't tweet about politics nowadays. He never once brought up Trump after returning to the internet.
- Agreed. Did some rewriting, and made it a subsection. I cut the Clinton comparison out, not sure that's really needed. Hurtful Truth Level (talk) 23:56, 10 September 2024 (EDT)
Is a separate page for Kamala Harris warranted at this point?
Chris has spent basically all of the past 2 months posting about and retweeting her. He's been infinitely more vocal about her than he was about Biden. Cottonmather (talk) 01:01, 3 November 2024 (EST)