Difference between revisions of "Talk:CWCipedia"

From CWCki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(22 intermediate revisions by 15 users not shown)
Line 94: Line 94:
:::You'll probably find the comic here at the cwckiut since Chris can't actually post any comic at any site, the update should be on hold up until chris finds another site, and the CWCipedia tracker should change name, considering Chris gave up the CWCipedia.--[[User:Basgon|Basgon]] 05:24, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
:::You'll probably find the comic here at the cwckiut since Chris can't actually post any comic at any site, the update should be on hold up until chris finds another site, and the CWCipedia tracker should change name, considering Chris gave up the CWCipedia.--[[User:Basgon|Basgon]] 05:24, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
:::Bill, I think there's a link to the pre-vandalism CWCipedia on the article itself.--[[User:Blazer|Blazer]] 06:09, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
:::Bill, I think there's a link to the pre-vandalism CWCipedia on the article itself.--[[User:Blazer|Blazer]] 06:09, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
{{Not_A_Forum}}
Haw, I like the "circle 9" they're using as the website's icon. Baka baka baka baka baka. --[[User:Pedonymous|Pedonymous]]


== Rewrite ideas ==
== Rewrite ideas ==
Line 99: Line 101:
Now that this episode of Chris's history is over, it'd probably a good idea to rewrite this article more than a little bit, because currently it's a bit like a big ball of mud. It would probably make sense if we had some sort of overview section (what the CWCipedia was, how Chris used it, what kind of articles were there, and what kind of failures were inevitably met) and then explain the history of the site in detail. The various trolling episodes, like the Jack's famed advertising efforts, should probably go into another article ("Jack's CWCipedia ads" or whatever). Thoughts? --''[[User:Wwwwolf|wwwwolf]]'' <span style="font-size:smaller;">([[User talk:Wwwwolf|wake me when you need me]])</span> 21:38, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
Now that this episode of Chris's history is over, it'd probably a good idea to rewrite this article more than a little bit, because currently it's a bit like a big ball of mud. It would probably make sense if we had some sort of overview section (what the CWCipedia was, how Chris used it, what kind of articles were there, and what kind of failures were inevitably met) and then explain the history of the site in detail. The various trolling episodes, like the Jack's famed advertising efforts, should probably go into another article ("Jack's CWCipedia ads" or whatever). Thoughts? --''[[User:Wwwwolf|wwwwolf]]'' <span style="font-size:smaller;">([[User talk:Wwwwolf|wake me when you need me]])</span> 21:38, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
*I support. CWCipedia was a whole saga in itself. --[[User:Edward|Edward]] 22:04, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
*I support. CWCipedia was a whole saga in itself. --[[User:Edward|Edward]] 22:04, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
== CWCipedia spits out the dust ==
...he got it back. [[User:Pfargtl9000|Pfargtl9000 Spam and Eggs]] 05:15, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
:* Nah he didn't. Look closer. --[[User:Ronichu|Ronichu]] 07:48, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
::* Yup, so anyone think the new section should be rewritten or left as it is? [[User:Nechita|Nechita]] 10:20, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
:::*Rewrite it and the entire article in itself. [[User:Pfargtl9000|Pfargtl9000 Spam and Eggs]] 15:04, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
== CWCipedia Suspended? ==
Anyone have any idea what this is for? [[User:Straw|Straw]] 16:43, 26 June 2010
I don't know, but considering the ORANGE IMPOSTER is in control of Asperpedia at the moment, it might have carried over to CWCipedia. Or the powers that be are planning something. [[User:Bill Lumburg|Bill Lumburg]] 18:53, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
*Or maybe Vivian realised that her attempt at a troll scheme was a failure and just decided to shut down the site, for great justice. Incidentally, I want to know what the legal status of Sonichu is if it was work for hire to the CWCipedia and and CWCipedia is now dead. --[[User:Edward|Edward]] 19:53, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
**It's still, if it really is considered work-for-hire, copyrighted to the owners of the CWCipedia, I believe -- whomever they may be.  If Chris agreed to assign his copyright rights to the owners of the CWCipedia, then that means they are under copyright protection for up to 35 years.  The owners of the CWCipedia are the ones who may choose to negotiate the termination of the copyright.  It's all [http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap2.html#204 here] in black and white.  I might be misreading it, but there is a certificate of transfer (in the form of the WFH form signed by both parties), and that serves as the major evidence that the transfer took place.  --[[User:Grey|Grey]] 8:59, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
***Due to complaints about the old vandalized cwcipedia apparently, it was still up. [[User:Clydec|Clydec]] 21:17, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
****Can some lawfag translate for me? I know he didn't give a "note or memorandum of the transfer... in writing and signed by the owner of the rights conveyed" because it wasn't signed and isn't in writing, only typing which doesn't count in court of law. Furthermore, as it isn't being lawfully seized, it isn't an "operation of law". Did he then give an "instrument of conveyance" by stating he was abandoning the site? If not, than we fail the first hurdle in saying that the copyright isn't his because the transfer of copyright isn't legally valid by this law. [[User:Thelieisacake|Thelieisacake]] 21:39, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
== How did it all begin? ==
The "early days" history is fairly ambiguous. All we know was that it was hosted on [[User:Cogsdev|Cogs's]] server. We don't know why Chris requested it, or why Cogs offered the space... --[[User:SeventhBase|Seventh]][[User Talk:SeventhBase|Base]] 14:15, 2 September 2010 (PDT)
== tmi? ==
I don't want to step on any toes due to my newfaggotry but one of the most recent edits (in the parenthetical bit in the first line) has me wondering if it really should be there. The CWCipedia drama has always left mrs horse & I puzzled until we saw that, after which we both fell over from the incredible impact of lulz. i know Chris reads the CWCiki, so I ask if this is too much info at this time. [[User:Horsehorsehorse|Horsehorsehorse]] 16:35, 29 September 2010 (PDT)
:That's a good question. Truthfully, seeing as the CWCipedia is gone, there's no need to reduce to TMI - it's over, it's served its purpose and now we look at the archives and we chronicle how it got that way. As well, the TMI also serves as a deterrent against Chris: he hates having to read long things. When he does, he gets stressed and leaves.
== Dead link ==
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
* http://gayrights.change.org/
** In [[CWCipedia]] on 2011-09-20 22:30:40, Error: ''
** In [[CWCipedia]] on 2011-09-28 08:01:57, Error: ''
--[[User:Anonymax|Anonymax]] 01:01, 28 September 2011 (PDT)
==File Not Found==
Where is the archived CWCipedia? All links are broken. Is it gone forever? What's up here? [[User:Asperhes|asperhes]], 4/2/15
==Broken CWCipedia==
Hi guys, I think I may be able to explain why the CWCipedia is down. The server is using PHP 7.2.10, but I think the MediaWiki software that powers the archive have not been updated, according to [https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Topic:Tazthc8drqv4sexr this help thread]. I think that the CWCipedia will work again when the software is updated to something like MediaWiki 1.32. --[[User:Little Owl|Little Owl]] ([[User talk:Little Owl|talk]]) 16:23, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 11:23, 24 May 2019

Man I wish Chris would stop

Thank god he's already half-way there! Ahahahahah. Clydec 03:02, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Redirected

Is it possible that the CWCipedia was redirected due to Chris's comments in his last video? --BreadGod 15:36, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

  • Well, his last video reached the ED message board. This means "Open Season" on Chris's racist arse. Griffintown 16:25, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
  • We'll know if it is replaced by either a message from the NAACP or if several ads involving giant black cocks suddenly show up. Still, the EDF pestering him seems to annoy Chris the most and this will set them off.--MoarLurk 17:42, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Mao is awesome

The impossible has been done people. Mao has defeated the CWCipedia Royal Navy and comandeered their vessle. This is a golden age for the pirates, and we shall rule the high seas forever! --Edward 21:51, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

I think shit might be getting real here folks.--Beat 22:40, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
I was talking about how that would be the best way to troll Chris today. Taking his property is the best way to piss him off, and about the only way at them moment. It'll blow Tito out of the water though... --YawningSquirtleRedux 23:22, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
Vandalism galore. BTW, I uploaded all the images they used to vandalize the place. Pfargtl9000 03:57, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
Chris never learns from the trolling, taking his CWCipedia wasn't probably a good thing for the CWCki, because the CWCipedia gave a lot of insight info about Chris. Probably Chris will crash into slumber once more and be inactive for a while.Basgon 14:17, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
We'll have to see. If the damage is too great then probably. Chris is not one for hard work, and there is quite alot to repair. I didn't think that this would happen on quite such a grand scale... --YawningSquirtleRedux 16:05, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
The damage IS too great. There's no way the CWCipedia can be restored without it becoming a clean slate, or it could be moved to this server. Anyway, the vandalism can be found here. Pfargtl9000 18:33, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
The CWCipedia became useless sometime around January when he gave up on mailbags, comic pages, character bio pages and was content on just sitting on his ass playing the PS3. In fact, when the vandalizing first started he was playing God of War III. Now he's playing Heavy Rain. So yeah. also archive: archive.cogsdev.org Clydec 19:24, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
Fair point. He's probably not too bothered then --YawningSquirtleRedux 19:25, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
Indeed, he'll probably just start up a new website with his monthly tugboat, and I guarantee that the new site will be hacked within days of its creation. The CWCipedia was the only place where Chris could safely post stuff that we could all laugh at. --BreadGod 20:12, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
Odds on his return to cogs at some point? --YawningSquirtleRedux 20:23, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
Maybe he'll try a site like deviantart once more, like cheezyart or something that is free and it's not hard to use, but in that case, he would get banned shortly.Basgon 20:31, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
If that is the case, then maybe it is in our best intrests to help restore CWCipedia? Thoughts? --Edward 21:41, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
I'm assuming (hoping) the the PVCC kept an archival copy of the CWCipedia before they invited us to go open season so us dedicated Christorians can reference all the insane crap he wrote. If not, well there's always the page histories. Lol, I'm dumb. Clyde put the archive up earlier on this very page. So now the intellegent thing to do would be to change the templates and cites that link to the CWCipedia to link to the archive instead.--Beat 21:44, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
And what of the future? Most of all our new info comes from CWCipedia. If thats gone and Chris has no place to put his homophobic rants, then where will our info come from? That Mailbag is a goldmine, and if not for trolls, we would still have a chance of him ansewing it. If Chris makes his own new site, I can promise you that there would not be a mailbag. --Edward 22:09, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
No worries, if it gets that bad, they'll just put the original CWCipedia back up. Chris is daft enough to brush it off as some sort of hacker anyway. He can't last on his own site, it would be hacked too quickly. --YawningSquirtleRedux 22:13, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
He can last well on his own site if the ones who HACK IT DON'T DO IT. (WINK). The thing is the mailbags would be lost but fuck it, chris doesn't want to do SHIT anymore. He can easily set up a blog, upload some comic pages on his own. if you want your questions answered ask him yourself. Clydec 15:54, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
  • It's RIP CWCipedia then I guess... The tracker can be redone though, for wherever he chooses to go next, so that's not a great loss, at any rate. --18:00, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Some time ago, Chris came back to the CWCipedia and attempted to revert all of the vandalism that was done to it. As of now, he seems to have stopped. Maybe he's in the process of making a video where he rages about the fact that his wiki has been vandalized to hell. --BreadGod 18:47, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

  • Nope, he made a video about how he's leaving the internet. --DStecks 00:17, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

It seems that the WikiSysop took back control of the site, according to this. --BreadGod 02:17, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

It could be as well a trap to lure chris, let's wait to see what happens.Basgon 04:19, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
I'm betting Chris will be back soon. --Edward 17:20, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

CWCipedia as our official "Uncyclopedia"?

I know that a lot of you probably thinks that Uncyclopedia is unfunny, but I am thinking more of the concept behind Uncyclopedia. A sort of place for the more intelligent vandalism and other things, that, while funny, would never fly on the CWCki, and it has already sort of become that, with the massive vandalism lately.--Blachman 20:01, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

  • Well, forget about that, because the damn Sysop reverted it to its pre-Mao state. Now Chris is gonna be back within a week. --Marco 03:38, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

It's Dead, Baby, It's Dead...

  • I think that the whole CWCipedia is dead, I clicked on the link and it directed me to an error page. Should we make a mention about it? --UJ1A1985 06:08, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
  • Nothing is unusual, it's just 110mb being shit.-- 06:28, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
  • Given Chris's already faulty understanding of religion and the fact it came back on Easter might this inflate Chris's ego even more?

Shawths

  • He'll probably proclaim the return of the CWCipedia as a miracle and then proceed to rub it in the faces of those DANG, DIRTY TROLLS in a YouTube video. --BreadGod 22:55, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
  • I think that the CWCipedia may have crashed into slumber for awhile, error or not. Keep in mind that Chris wasn't doing ANYTHING on there even before it was hijacked by Mao. Chris hasn't uploaded any new comic pages and hasn't answered any of the mailbag questions for quite at least a month now. This isn't to say Chris won't go back to it (he can't stay off the internet) but he may not use the website until he gets bored and/or forgets about the trolls. --Caboose -1 23:10, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Ressurection

Disregard that its back. Just had to fucking come back on my birthday of all the days >:(. although its still unlikely Chris will get of his lazy ass and update it though Dkd 15:17, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

happy belated birthday? --Jellystapler 06:44, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Song placed on it

So theres a song currently on the Cwcipedia and I was wondering first what is its name, and secondly did chris chose it or did Alec/Mao? --Shawths

  • I'm guessing it was either the latter or Jack Thaddeus. N. Onymous 21:33, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

Asperchu advertisement

So now there's a gigantic Asperchu ad on top of every article, depicting a page from Asperchu where Christian Weston Chandler Ian Brandon Anderson gets shot in the calves (just desserts considering what he did to Liquid in Sonichu Special 4). How much do you want to bet Chris will completely lose his shit over this and make a vaguely threatening YouTube video about it? N. Onymous 21:33, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

  • CWCki is not a forum. There's plenty of other places to talk about this and this isn't one of those places. This talk page should be reserved for improving the article on the CWCipedia and not CWCipedia related commentary. --Champthom 21:43, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

Fan Mail

So apparently it's like the mailbags, only with more asskissing. I guess I'm getting what I wished for, but I'm not exactly thrilled at the prospect of having to kiss Chris's ass.--Beat 14:58, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

The Great Rampage 2.0

  • Added some info about CWCipedia getting gang raped again, feel free to add stuff on it! --UJ1A1985 07:09, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

CWCipedia bites the dust

Well, it seems all the stress has finally become to much for chris, and he's just decided to quit and fail, just like every other thing he does in life... Perhaps now that he's relinquished control, maybe Alec could take over the Sonichu franchise? --SargentPickles 12:57, 27 May 2010 (EST)

  • Chris stated in his recent video that everything on the internet about him is false, which includes the videos he put up claiming to be the true and honest owner of Sonichu. Alec has ground to stand on if this plan works, and nothing will get Chris back faster than the thought that someone has taken Sonichu.--MoarLurk 18:29, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
That sounds perfect. We should get the sysop to lock up the CWCipedia, clean it up, and give control and copyright of Sonichu over to Alec. --BreadGod 18:51, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
And Alec has the copyright because Chris failed to update the comic for three months straight. That might work, but again it's all up to PVCC.--MoarLurk 19:57, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

And so it has been! Take a look over at the new CWCipedia, look who's in charge :) --SargentPickles 17:33, 27 May 2010 (EST)

Maybe now we should start an e-mail campaign where we praise Chris for his vast improvement in his skills when he created Sonichu Season 2. --BreadGod 18:10, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

Oh fucking hell, what happened? I go up north for the weekend and suddenly, BLAM. The fuck? --Pedonymous 13:58, 31 May 2010 (EST)

On the FAQ page, it states that Alec now has legal ownership of sonichu. all it should take is a fake store selling merchandise and an outpouring of praise for the new comic and he'll come roaring back... Chris has always been very defensive about asserting his property rights, this should push him over the edge --SargentPickles 14:28, 31 May 2010 (EST)
Oh god we have to make retarded Sonichu shirts and put them on one of those t-shirt websites. We just have to. --Pedonymous

I only used to go to CWCipedia to do first-hand research on the comic. Where am I supposed to read it now? Does Alec actually control the first season or is he just saying that to piss Chris off? Bill Lumburg 19:26, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

Chris made a promise to update his comic on a daily basis, and he has failed to update for three months straight. Also, when Chris uploaded his comics to the CWCipedia, he surrendered the copyright of Sonichu over to the CWCipedia, and since Alec and Vivian now own the CWCipedia, the copyright of Sonichu now belongs to them. --BreadGod 20:10, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
I already know all that. What I'm saying is where else can I read the comic? I'm doing research for my own troll fic and I need specific insight of the past comics. Bill Lumburg 04:57, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
You'll probably find the comic here at the cwckiut since Chris can't actually post any comic at any site, the update should be on hold up until chris finds another site, and the CWCipedia tracker should change name, considering Chris gave up the CWCipedia.--Basgon 05:24, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
Bill, I think there's a link to the pre-vandalism CWCipedia on the article itself.--Blazer 06:09, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Haw, I like the "circle 9" they're using as the website's icon. Baka baka baka baka baka. --Pedonymous

Rewrite ideas

Now that this episode of Chris's history is over, it'd probably a good idea to rewrite this article more than a little bit, because currently it's a bit like a big ball of mud. It would probably make sense if we had some sort of overview section (what the CWCipedia was, how Chris used it, what kind of articles were there, and what kind of failures were inevitably met) and then explain the history of the site in detail. The various trolling episodes, like the Jack's famed advertising efforts, should probably go into another article ("Jack's CWCipedia ads" or whatever). Thoughts? --wwwwolf (wake me when you need me) 21:38, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

  • I support. CWCipedia was a whole saga in itself. --Edward 22:04, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

CWCipedia spits out the dust

...he got it back. Pfargtl9000 Spam and Eggs 05:15, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

  • Nah he didn't. Look closer. --Ronichu 07:48, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
  • Yup, so anyone think the new section should be rewritten or left as it is? Nechita 10:20, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

CWCipedia Suspended?

Anyone have any idea what this is for? Straw 16:43, 26 June 2010

I don't know, but considering the ORANGE IMPOSTER is in control of Asperpedia at the moment, it might have carried over to CWCipedia. Or the powers that be are planning something. Bill Lumburg 18:53, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

  • Or maybe Vivian realised that her attempt at a troll scheme was a failure and just decided to shut down the site, for great justice. Incidentally, I want to know what the legal status of Sonichu is if it was work for hire to the CWCipedia and and CWCipedia is now dead. --Edward 19:53, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
    • It's still, if it really is considered work-for-hire, copyrighted to the owners of the CWCipedia, I believe -- whomever they may be. If Chris agreed to assign his copyright rights to the owners of the CWCipedia, then that means they are under copyright protection for up to 35 years. The owners of the CWCipedia are the ones who may choose to negotiate the termination of the copyright. It's all here in black and white. I might be misreading it, but there is a certificate of transfer (in the form of the WFH form signed by both parties), and that serves as the major evidence that the transfer took place. --Grey 8:59, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
      • Due to complaints about the old vandalized cwcipedia apparently, it was still up. Clydec 21:17, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
        • Can some lawfag translate for me? I know he didn't give a "note or memorandum of the transfer... in writing and signed by the owner of the rights conveyed" because it wasn't signed and isn't in writing, only typing which doesn't count in court of law. Furthermore, as it isn't being lawfully seized, it isn't an "operation of law". Did he then give an "instrument of conveyance" by stating he was abandoning the site? If not, than we fail the first hurdle in saying that the copyright isn't his because the transfer of copyright isn't legally valid by this law. Thelieisacake 21:39, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

How did it all begin?

The "early days" history is fairly ambiguous. All we know was that it was hosted on Cogs's server. We don't know why Chris requested it, or why Cogs offered the space... --SeventhBase 14:15, 2 September 2010 (PDT)

tmi?

I don't want to step on any toes due to my newfaggotry but one of the most recent edits (in the parenthetical bit in the first line) has me wondering if it really should be there. The CWCipedia drama has always left mrs horse & I puzzled until we saw that, after which we both fell over from the incredible impact of lulz. i know Chris reads the CWCiki, so I ask if this is too much info at this time. Horsehorsehorse 16:35, 29 September 2010 (PDT)

That's a good question. Truthfully, seeing as the CWCipedia is gone, there's no need to reduce to TMI - it's over, it's served its purpose and now we look at the archives and we chronicle how it got that way. As well, the TMI also serves as a deterrent against Chris: he hates having to read long things. When he does, he gets stressed and leaves.

Dead link

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--Anonymax 01:01, 28 September 2011 (PDT)

File Not Found

Where is the archived CWCipedia? All links are broken. Is it gone forever? What's up here? asperhes, 4/2/15

Broken CWCipedia

Hi guys, I think I may be able to explain why the CWCipedia is down. The server is using PHP 7.2.10, but I think the MediaWiki software that powers the archive have not been updated, according to this help thread. I think that the CWCipedia will work again when the software is updated to something like MediaWiki 1.32. --Little Owl (talk) 16:23, 24 May 2019 (UTC)