Difference between revisions of "User talk:Eamoo"
(→Please,: new section) |
m (→Please,) |
||
Line 92: | Line 92: | ||
== Please, == | == Please, == | ||
The plural of Pony is Ponies, please stop editing 'Ponys' into articles. | The plural of Pony is Ponies, please stop editing 'Ponys' into articles.[[User:EddySteel|EddySteel]] 08:50, 6 November 2012 (PST) |
Revision as of 11:50, 6 November 2012
Welcome to the CWCki!-trombonista 04:58, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
- Great work on the Christory template! RachmaninovDESU 14:33, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
Tempest quote
Where was it, and what is the actual Shakespeare quote for comparison? --SeventhBase 22:41, 14 August 2010 (PDT)
I've added it to the page. Eamoo 05:24, 15 August 2010 (PDT)
Are you the writer of CWCville 1984?
Because if you're not, I don't think the original author would appreciate the corrections, even if they are legitimate grammar/usage fixes. --SeventhBase 14:54, 16 August 2010 (PDT)
Wtf is this?
Release date for Pokémon Black and White in Japan. Irrelevant shit shouldn't be in the Cwchronology. RachmaninovDESU
You deserve an award
For your diligent wikification and editing. Now who gives out these things? --SeventhBase 06:46, 16 September 2010 (PDT)
TRUE and HONEST
Why are you unilaterally de-capitalizing all instances of this? It's already an established convention. --SeventhBase 20:47, 6 October 2010 (PDT)
Your grammar-nazi-ing is going a bit too far, I say. You're starting to edit written quotes, when the policy is that they remain as Chris wrote them, spelling/grammar errors and all! --SeventhBase 12:57, 7 October 2010 (PDT)
- Indeeed. Keep this up and I'm afraid I'll have to ban you for fucking up quotes and established conventions.--Champthom 13:54, 7 October 2010 (PDT)
- That is, I'm afraid I'll have to ban you, Eamoo, not SeventhBase.--Champthom 13:54, 7 October 2010 (PDT)
- I'd like to see TRUE and HONEST restored to their former glory. --Anonymax 14:25, 7 October 2010 (PDT)
IT IS UNDONE Eamoo 19:21, 10 October 2010 (PDT)
</choose><choose><option weight=95></option><option weight=5>XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
</option>
I'm Snuffleupagus!
[walks into Eamoo's bedroom and slobbers on him while flailing trunk about and making gargling noises] AAARRRGGGHHH! AAARRRGGGHHH! AAARRRGGGHHH! AAARRRGGGHHH! --Snuffleupagus 06:39, 3 February 2011 (PST)
- Oh look, it's this shit again. Freecell 06:41, 3 February 2011 (PST)
That's right, Freecell! I will squeeze your life out of you with my snuffle! --Snuffleupagus 06:52, 3 February 2011 (PST)
Just a message to say
Thanks for the suggestion, but in future send page title suggestions to Champ, not me. I wrote the page, but he's still the boss around here.
Also Snuffleupagus is a faggot. I know it's obvious, but seeing his message on your page, I thought it beared repeating. --Old meme 07:11, 27 May 2011 (PDT)
Abuse of {{rename}} (Usage)
So, standard convention is to name video articles after the true and honest video name Chris gave it on YouTube. Exceptions to this are when several videos can be grouped up in to one article (like with Calling Out) or when two videos have the exact same name (rarely happens with numbered video titles, as they're sequential). It would be appreciated if you could stop adding the rename tag to so many video articles. --Anonymax 04:32, 8 August 2011 (PDT)
But lots of video article are renames - Cleveland Show Voice Rant, Greene County Conspiracy, Cwcsicle, War Paint Video. just think descriptive names are better. Eamoo 08:21, 8 August 2011 (PDT)
- Like I said, we have exceptions - but the policy is to name the articles as per Chris's video name. Usual exceptions include instances of grouping - as per my example above & Cwcsicle, when a video has a long name (Cleveland Show Voice Rant), or when videos have names that are the same or very similar (War Paint Video). Greene County Conspiracy actually breaks policy for some reason - but I am not one to judge the actual significance of that video - so it may fall under that reason. --Anonymax 09:15, 8 August 2011 (PDT)
Fair enough. Maybe the greene county page should be changed back, and I think 51 50 should go under that title. Eamoo 10:32, 8 August 2011 (PDT)
Barbara Chandler and Snorlax pix
Did Chris really do the Snorlax pic you added to the Barbara Chandler page? If so, I'll change the categorisation of the image file and the caption on that page should probably be changed as well. – BrianBash (talk|cont) 12:13, 26 August 2011 (PDT)
Yes, it's in issue 4. Eamoo 12:15, 26 August 2011 (PDT)
sb
<choose><option weight=1>xxxxxx</option><option weight=1>yyyyyy </option><option weight=1>zzzzz</option><option weight=1>qqqqqqqq</option></choose>
<choose><option weight=1>xxxxxx</option><option weight=1>yyyyyy </option><option weight=1>zzzzz</option><option weight=1>qqqqqqqq</option></choose>
<choose><option weight=1>xxxxxx</option><option weight=1>yyyyyy </option><option weight=1>zzzzz</option><option weight=1>qqqqqqqq</option></choose>
<choose><option weight=1>xxxxxx</option><option weight=1>yyyyyy </option><option weight=1>zzzzz</option><option weight=1>qqqqqqqq</option></choose>
You're killing me, man
Dude, seriously, I saw what you did to the Captain's Log template. Stardates, seriously? Most people are going to be confused as hell seeing that sort of thing and I've never seen a template that is not helpful at all. Maybe you were trying to make it more concise but in the process you only made it more confusing to you. I've dabbled in Star Trek and it still took me a few seconds to figure out what the hell was going on. Anyways, I reverted your edits for that reason. In the future, remember that usability comes before cleverness or making a joke. --Champthom 05:28, 27 October 2011 (PDT)
2012 month articles
Dude, I've noticed you've made articles up to April of this year and if Chris was producing more content, I'd think this would reasonable. However, I really think that for 2012, assuming nothing major happens or Chris makes a miraculous return to the Internet, that perhaps we could do the months on a quarterly basis (like, January - March would be one article, April- June, etc.) because we're gonna have month articles that'll only have one or two things for a given month. I'll leave it as it is now, but just something to keep in mind before you make new articles --Champthom 06:11, 16 January 2012 (PST)
jh
11.9.08 Christian's Update 11 September 2008 13.9.08 Christian's Update 13 September 2008 13.10.08 Chris Chan Update 13 October 2008 15.10.08 The OFFICIAL Sonichu & Rosechu Blog 16.10.08 IRC (16 October 2008) 21.10.08 Chris Chan Update 21 October 2008 24.10.08 IRC (24 October 2008) 27.10.08 Chris Chan Q&A 27 October 2008 28.12.08 IRC (28 December 2008) 2.1.09 Takashi Tezuka 4.2.09 Mumble 2 6.9.09 Sign Destruction Video 17.12.09 Chris chan (CWCipedia)
Please,
The plural of Pony is Ponies, please stop editing 'Ponys' into articles.EddySteel 08:50, 6 November 2012 (PST)